My third re-read of ACoS was like that; I couldn't stand it until then.
Joel Send a noteboard - 12/09/2009 10:24:20 AM
I think in my memory it was tainted by proximity to the later ones, especially APoD (the worst book, IMHO; nothing happens except Elaynes horse is killed shortly after they FINALLY use the Bowl, and Rand spends many bloody chapters fighting the Seanchan to a savage draw that leaves things as they were at the start of the book, minus a lot more semi-major characters--plus it's the only book from which Mat is wholly absent. )
Still, the whole point of a re-read is to refresh details that may have become murky or even forgotten; just a little while ago I was embarrassed to learn that failure to re-read KoD before posting a theory caused me to think Elaida knew of the plan for Reds to Bond Asha'man when she clearly doesn't. I don't expect you to forget the Cleansing or even Aginors (second and likely final) death there, but who was present and did what would likely benefit from a re-read. I'd like to re-read the whole series as well, as I did before KoD (in fact the day it was released I went and bought my reserved copy, then stared at it out of the corner of my eye for the day it took me to re-read all of CoT myself) I just don't have the time.
If you're like me, however, ACoS is the last book that will improve on re-read, with the possible exception of KoD. The first seven books were good, and 4-6 truly great, IMHO, but after ACoS it's always felt to me like Jordan was trying to pad things out to an artificially and symbolically selected number of twelve or thirteen books (which has gone out the window since Sanderson has decided against both Jordans insisted plan to make AMoL one final volume AND Tors insisted plans to make it two. ) It's not even a case of there being very little action (though there isn't, with a few frenetic exceptions) the plot itself doesn't advance very much apart from the Cleansing and the Bowl. Hence the lines in Isams parodies of the later books about "at all costs we must avoid doing anything. "
There's an object lesson in that; as a direct result KoD feels more rushed than I feared it would, and since it spends about two thirds of its length resolving Failes kidnapping (a plotline introduced, IIRC, in the Epilogue to APoD and that nearly ruins the later books, IMHO) I expected AMoL to be even MORE rushed as Jordan hurried to wrap up the whole series in a single massive volume. That Sanderson has chosen to split the final volume into THREE books likely weighing in at over three quarters of a million words indicates he agrees.
Still, the whole point of a re-read is to refresh details that may have become murky or even forgotten; just a little while ago I was embarrassed to learn that failure to re-read KoD before posting a theory caused me to think Elaida knew of the plan for Reds to Bond Asha'man when she clearly doesn't. I don't expect you to forget the Cleansing or even Aginors (second and likely final) death there, but who was present and did what would likely benefit from a re-read. I'd like to re-read the whole series as well, as I did before KoD (in fact the day it was released I went and bought my reserved copy, then stared at it out of the corner of my eye for the day it took me to re-read all of CoT myself) I just don't have the time.
If you're like me, however, ACoS is the last book that will improve on re-read, with the possible exception of KoD. The first seven books were good, and 4-6 truly great, IMHO, but after ACoS it's always felt to me like Jordan was trying to pad things out to an artificially and symbolically selected number of twelve or thirteen books (which has gone out the window since Sanderson has decided against both Jordans insisted plan to make AMoL one final volume AND Tors insisted plans to make it two. ) It's not even a case of there being very little action (though there isn't, with a few frenetic exceptions) the plot itself doesn't advance very much apart from the Cleansing and the Bowl. Hence the lines in Isams parodies of the later books about "at all costs we must avoid doing anything. "
There's an object lesson in that; as a direct result KoD feels more rushed than I feared it would, and since it spends about two thirds of its length resolving Failes kidnapping (a plotline introduced, IIRC, in the Epilogue to APoD and that nearly ruins the later books, IMHO) I expected AMoL to be even MORE rushed as Jordan hurried to wrap up the whole series in a single massive volume. That Sanderson has chosen to split the final volume into THREE books likely weighing in at over three quarters of a million words indicates he agrees.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Should I skip CoT?
11/09/2009 08:16:41 PM
- 1003 Views
If you've read that far, you owe it to yourself to read all the books, so no *NM*
11/09/2009 10:08:26 PM
- 286 Views
I'm on tFoH and I plan on reading the whole series through and through.
12/09/2009 03:10:01 AM
- 645 Views
If you liked CoS much better the second time around whos to say the same thing won't happen with CoT
12/09/2009 04:19:04 AM
- 586 Views
Give it a try. If you're bored, skip it. You already know what happens. *NM*
12/09/2009 04:31:11 AM
- 489 Views
This is what I do with my rereads
12/09/2009 04:47:53 AM
- 697 Views
ACoS, PoD, WH and CoT are much better understood when read in succcession.
12/09/2009 03:16:23 PM
- 583 Views
My third re-read of ACoS was like that; I couldn't stand it until then.
12/09/2009 10:24:20 AM
- 764 Views
Let me put it this way, since CoT came out I've stopped doing rereads
12/09/2009 04:54:56 PM
- 584 Views