Active Users:591 Time:18/04/2025 11:29:03 PM
This is an excellent question. Nameless Ashaman Send a noteboard - 02/09/2010 10:05:17 PM
Sadly, I don't have the answer.

It is peculiar though, since their doesn't seem to be any environmental or sociological reason for humanity not to have grown in numbers and expanded back into the empty lands. All indications in the series are that conditions were very favourable for societal growth in the centuries preceding Rand's birth.

I wonder if RJ had an explanation for this or if it's just something he didn't think through.
Reply to message
Why is humanity receding? - 02/09/2010 07:10:11 PM 1462 Views
This is an excellent question. - 02/09/2010 10:05:17 PM 1039 Views
Thanks. - 02/09/2010 10:30:53 PM 962 Views
I think there is mass ennuis and exhaustion - 02/09/2010 10:30:32 PM 820 Views
Maybe... - 03/09/2010 12:20:08 AM 782 Views
Re: Maybe... - 03/09/2010 03:00:25 PM 730 Views
Re: Why is humanity receding? - 03/09/2010 12:10:30 AM 850 Views
I'm not sure. - 03/09/2010 12:23:00 AM 695 Views
Sometimes populations just declined - 03/09/2010 12:30:33 AM 839 Views
I hadn't thought of that. - 03/09/2010 12:52:01 AM 765 Views
Life conditions have been deteriorating gradually - 03/09/2010 02:06:03 AM 984 Views
As a peasant, I am offended, but as fan of WoT, I like your analysis =P - 03/09/2010 05:34:55 PM 702 Views
Well - 03/09/2010 09:45:40 PM 760 Views
very nice analysis! I think you summed it up almost perfectly - 05/09/2010 04:56:11 PM 724 Views
Cities of old - 23/09/2010 10:43:35 AM 648 Views
The Taint - 03/09/2010 05:41:21 AM 658 Views
Re: Why is humanity receding? - 03/09/2010 08:56:42 AM 820 Views
True. *NM* - 03/09/2010 06:57:25 PM 326 Views

Reply to Message