Active Users:331 Time:19/04/2025 01:57:10 PM
"Troublesome," yes. Competent, no. Cannoli Send a noteboard - 25/08/2010 05:05:00 PM
Just because his actions had these effects does not make him competent. One would assume that quality denotes a certainly ability to achieve INTENDED effects. Whatever the case may be for his competence, a list of the unintended side effects of his actions is not a legitimate argument one way or another. I would hold that he isn't all that far down the charts of competence, but I would not list these as his "achievements." This is like giving Egwene credit for unifying the Tower.
Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
Reply to message
who killed barthanes? - 24/08/2010 12:39:38 AM 1590 Views
shaidar haran wasn't even created back then - 24/08/2010 01:17:11 AM 788 Views
he threatens jaichim carridin at the beginning of tDR - 24/08/2010 05:54:33 PM 700 Views
that wasn't SH - 24/08/2010 06:41:35 PM 729 Views
well that then - 25/08/2010 12:23:13 AM 662 Views
??? - 25/08/2010 12:42:10 AM 621 Views
well that (what you described) then *NM* - 25/08/2010 01:02:17 AM 288 Views
Re: who killed barthanes? - 24/08/2010 01:19:56 AM 973 Views
Re: who killed barthanes? - 24/08/2010 08:28:10 AM 864 Views
I don't recall if there was a consensus on this one.... - 24/08/2010 04:34:19 AM 715 Views
Gholam, Lanfear, or Slayer *NM* - 24/08/2010 05:26:17 AM 341 Views
Couldn't it have just been a Myrdraall? *NM* - 24/08/2010 07:55:51 AM 289 Views
By deduction.... - 24/08/2010 05:00:41 PM 829 Views
Interesting take on Fel - 25/08/2010 12:52:48 AM 688 Views
If this is true - 25/08/2010 10:18:12 AM 683 Views
Only one point to dispute here - 25/08/2010 02:20:39 PM 672 Views
"Troublesome," yes. Competent, no. - 25/08/2010 05:05:00 PM 697 Views
I used to think this was obvious - 25/08/2010 09:25:05 PM 691 Views

Reply to Message