Active Users:387 Time:17/09/2025 09:09:06 PM
If that is the case why wasn't Ishy completely bound, allowing him to be free at key points? Japhy Send a noteboard - 18/08/2010 02:58:58 AM
better? or should I try again.
quote id="139539">Sorry, but you have it slightly wrong. It hasn't been fully explained that I'm aware of, but Ishmael didn't break free before the others, he was never completely bound in the first place somehow. He pops in and out of history in various places which makes me think he wasn't completely free and/or wasn't free the entire time somehow.
Reply to message
my first demandred suspect! (also a general forsaken question) - 18/08/2010 12:46:11 AM 900 Views
In response... - 18/08/2010 12:59:25 AM 643 Views
If that is the case why was Ishy far enough away to have been free long before anybody else? *NM* - 18/08/2010 01:37:39 AM 214 Views
Re: If that is the case why was Ishy far enough away to have been free long before anybody else? - 18/08/2010 02:35:24 AM 429 Views
If that is the case why wasn't Ishy completely bound, allowing him to be free at key points? - 18/08/2010 02:58:58 AM 473 Views
Sorry, like I said, I've never seen it explained... - 18/08/2010 05:22:20 AM 441 Views
Ishy was cyclically bound. - 18/08/2010 07:54:55 PM 397 Views
balthamel perhaps, but aginor was at least better than asmodean *NM* - 19/08/2010 06:06:51 PM 164 Views
From what I recall from the BWB... - 19/08/2010 06:27:15 PM 390 Views
had to check the BWB myself - 19/08/2010 07:18:49 PM 400 Views
My faulty memory there... - 20/08/2010 12:27:30 AM 472 Views
bah! prepare to agree - 20/08/2010 01:29:31 AM 2660 Views
No. We've been told that we haven't seen him onscreen as of KoD *NM* - 18/08/2010 01:19:21 PM 178 Views
ah of course, that'll refine my accusations at least *NM* - 19/08/2010 06:07:18 PM 185 Views

Reply to Message