If that is the case why wasn't Ishy completely bound, allowing him to be free at key points?
Japhy Send a noteboard - 18/08/2010 02:58:58 AM
better? or should I try again.
quote id="139539">Sorry, but you have it slightly wrong. It hasn't been fully explained that I'm aware of, but Ishmael didn't break free before the others, he was never completely bound in the first place somehow. He pops in and out of history in various places which makes me think he wasn't completely free and/or wasn't free the entire time somehow.
quote id="139539">Sorry, but you have it slightly wrong. It hasn't been fully explained that I'm aware of, but Ishmael didn't break free before the others, he was never completely bound in the first place somehow. He pops in and out of history in various places which makes me think he wasn't completely free and/or wasn't free the entire time somehow.
my first demandred suspect! (also a general forsaken question)
- 18/08/2010 12:46:11 AM
809 Views
In response...
- 18/08/2010 12:59:25 AM
555 Views
If that is the case why was Ishy far enough away to have been free long before anybody else? *NM*
- 18/08/2010 01:37:39 AM
173 Views
Re: If that is the case why was Ishy far enough away to have been free long before anybody else?
- 18/08/2010 02:35:24 AM
350 Views
If that is the case why wasn't Ishy completely bound, allowing him to be free at key points?
- 18/08/2010 02:58:58 AM
391 Views
balthamel perhaps, but aginor was at least better than asmodean *NM*
- 19/08/2010 06:06:51 PM
133 Views
From what I recall from the BWB...
- 19/08/2010 06:27:15 PM
312 Views
had to check the BWB myself
- 19/08/2010 07:18:49 PM
322 Views
No. We've been told that we haven't seen him onscreen as of KoD *NM*
- 18/08/2010 01:19:21 PM
144 Views