Active Users:546 Time:05/07/2025 06:49:58 PM
If that is the case why wasn't Ishy completely bound, allowing him to be free at key points? Japhy Send a noteboard - 18/08/2010 02:58:58 AM
better? or should I try again.
quote id="139539">Sorry, but you have it slightly wrong. It hasn't been fully explained that I'm aware of, but Ishmael didn't break free before the others, he was never completely bound in the first place somehow. He pops in and out of history in various places which makes me think he wasn't completely free and/or wasn't free the entire time somehow.
Reply to message
my first demandred suspect! (also a general forsaken question) - 18/08/2010 12:46:11 AM 877 Views
In response... - 18/08/2010 12:59:25 AM 615 Views
If that is the case why was Ishy far enough away to have been free long before anybody else? *NM* - 18/08/2010 01:37:39 AM 194 Views
Re: If that is the case why was Ishy far enough away to have been free long before anybody else? - 18/08/2010 02:35:24 AM 403 Views
If that is the case why wasn't Ishy completely bound, allowing him to be free at key points? - 18/08/2010 02:58:58 AM 447 Views
Sorry, like I said, I've never seen it explained... - 18/08/2010 05:22:20 AM 412 Views
Ishy was cyclically bound. - 18/08/2010 07:54:55 PM 372 Views
balthamel perhaps, but aginor was at least better than asmodean *NM* - 19/08/2010 06:06:51 PM 153 Views
From what I recall from the BWB... - 19/08/2010 06:27:15 PM 367 Views
had to check the BWB myself - 19/08/2010 07:18:49 PM 374 Views
My faulty memory there... - 20/08/2010 12:27:30 AM 447 Views
bah! prepare to agree - 20/08/2010 01:29:31 AM 2634 Views
No. We've been told that we haven't seen him onscreen as of KoD *NM* - 18/08/2010 01:19:21 PM 165 Views
ah of course, that'll refine my accusations at least *NM* - 19/08/2010 06:07:18 PM 171 Views

Reply to Message