Active Users:930 Time:15/11/2024 09:05:04 AM
Well the point of the original poster NaClH2O Send a noteboard - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM
Technically, the narrator isn't omniscient in each individual scene - while throughout the book, we can see into everyone's thoughts, each scene is written in third-person limited. I see why you'd have a problem with the writing, though and I agree that it'd be a case of bad writing, but only in the sense that it confuses the reader. I can't believe that this wouldn't be from Rand's POV; I can't imagine any competent writer would use that kind of commentary unless it's specifically in the style of the novel to do so, and BS is definitely more competent than that.

Unfortunately that was the original point. Basically scalius is trying to say that the sword is Turak's ... ok, it fits a lot of the criteria, but why the "And not, oddly, from Lews Therin’s memories—but Rand’s own." There is no way LTT would recognise Turak's sword. Scalius's point was that maybe the "oddly" was from the narrator. ie. the narrator himself thought it odd, not Rand. Therefor NOT from Rand's POV but the narrator's. That's what I'm objecting to.

NaCl(3rd person ltd should stay that way)H2O +<img class=' />
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1169 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 652 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 669 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 588 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 590 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 648 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 644 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 598 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 568 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 619 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 718 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 598 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 557 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 528 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 637 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 529 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 505 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 587 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 723 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 651 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 589 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 577 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 588 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 541 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 529 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1029 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 614 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 568 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 518 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 569 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 531 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 620 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 604 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 569 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 548 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 556 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 522 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 597 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 646 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 630 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 565 Views

Reply to Message