With the sul'dam forcing them they cannot help but to channel. The oath would make it impossible to form any weaves. I think the resulting conflict might lead to the death of the AS.
Two conflicting oaths would eventually lead to death, we've seen that they suffocate if they must lie and not lie at the same time. What would the reaction be between an Oath and the a'dam link?
I fear you are incorrect. If what you say was the case, then AS damane that the sul'dam tried to use as weapons would have died from the conflict. We know this is not the case. The AS are unharmed, but they simply cannot be used for that purpose. The a'dam works primarily through pain and torture breaking the victim. The oath rod however somehow implants the command directly to the mind through somekind of super-compulsion, making it far stronger.
The oath rods is more powerfull than the a'dam basically. It cannot be broken by the sul'dam. Even after the damane has been utterly broken by the torture, the oaths still stand.
About the oath "I won't give in to the Seanchan". The Oath doesn't give them any added quality to resist the Seanchan, does it? So if they're thinking of giving in they break the oath and..something.
I think a better oath would be to make an oath about not channeling at all while collared. Or perhaps an oath not to aid the Seanchan in any way, period. That way it would not matter if the Seanchan broke you, the oaths would still stand and the moment the AS tried to do anything, whether channel or reveal some secret information, the oaths would kick in and stop her.
This would ofcourse mean that the Seanchan would quickly abandon all efforts to capture AS, and just start killing them outright. But it would mean that any weaves discovered by the AS would remain secret, and that the Seanchan could not replenish their damane numbers with AS prisoners.
The White Tower has all the tools to defeat the Senahcan...
03/08/2010 10:32:03 PM
- 1484 Views
Re: The White Tower has all the tools to defeat the Senahcan...
03/08/2010 10:53:38 PM
- 932 Views
Why not take an oath...
04/08/2010 12:09:46 AM
- 803 Views
or just adapt the one power as a weapon oath to include a sister's freedom as well as her life *NM*
04/08/2010 01:45:43 AM
- 330 Views
Perhaps they would die?
04/08/2010 09:10:42 AM
- 943 Views
Re: Perhaps they would die?
04/08/2010 01:43:02 PM
- 777 Views
Re: Perhaps they would die?
04/08/2010 07:14:24 PM
- 666 Views
Re: Perhaps they would die?
04/08/2010 07:44:10 PM
- 691 Views
Re: Perhaps they would die?
05/08/2010 08:33:18 AM
- 642 Views
Re: Perhaps they would die?
05/08/2010 01:15:47 PM
- 674 Views
Re: Perhaps they would die?
05/08/2010 04:33:25 PM
- 724 Views
Re: Perhaps they would die?
06/08/2010 12:02:16 AM
- 703 Views
they can't
04/08/2010 12:54:46 AM
- 803 Views
Re: they can't
04/08/2010 02:27:45 AM
- 798 Views
Re: they can't
04/08/2010 07:09:45 AM
- 766 Views
Re: they can't
04/08/2010 02:44:10 PM
- 712 Views
read the oaths again
04/08/2010 08:15:24 PM
- 738 Views
I don't think #1 is as simple as you say.
04/08/2010 02:22:25 AM
- 707 Views
For the most part, they can only defend themselves...
04/08/2010 10:59:23 AM
- 868 Views
Re: For the most part, they can only defend themselves...
05/08/2010 01:17:44 AM
- 734 Views
I think the BT would wipe the floor with the damane on their home turf
05/08/2010 08:19:38 PM
- 655 Views
Re: I think the BT would wipe the floor with the damane on their home turf
05/08/2010 11:57:43 PM
- 690 Views
Whoa whoa whoa!
06/08/2010 03:07:34 AM
- 695 Views
I actually think the opposite: the damane would wipe the floor with the BT
13/08/2010 11:27:21 PM
- 703 Views
My thoughts on the damane...
05/08/2010 04:11:35 AM
- 651 Views
How exactly would Egwene learn where the Damane are kept?
05/08/2010 07:57:55 PM
- 894 Views
Interrogate the Damane.
05/08/2010 10:32:17 PM
- 598 Views