I've been in contact with enough fans to notice that some fans' notes are more detailed than others, and some of them are outright wrong. They aren't necessarily transcripts, so there is a lot of room for error and it seems to me that quite a few details that are significant to readers really wasn't much concern to RJ, so some fans place emphasis on answers that were really tongue-in-cheek responses.
There are some inconsistencies and errors in the reports. Therefore a direct post or official interview by the authors is naturally the most trustworthy source (though RJ & BS also made a few mistakes). However, if I have no special reason to doubt it, I would usually believe in what other fans report.
Again some little infos by BS
30/07/2010 09:02:39 AM
- 1389 Views
Re: Again some little infos by BS
30/07/2010 12:42:04 PM
- 821 Views
Did he?
30/07/2010 01:16:43 PM
- 700 Views
I've noticed that notes from these Q&As aren't consistent.
30/07/2010 03:29:16 PM
- 524 Views
That's right of course
30/07/2010 04:04:29 PM
- 611 Views