Active Users:414 Time:28/09/2024 09:59:26 AM
The problem is that by saying a soul can be damaged or corrupted like that, it isn't immortal RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 29/07/2010 05:47:04 PM
RJ specifically said that souls of Trollocs are so twisted and corrupted that they might as well not be souls anymore, which amounts to the same thing. This is keeping in mind that RJ has already said that physical characteristics don't necessarily carry over into another life, so Rand looks different from Lews Therin in many respects, while special mention is made of the souls belonging to the Heroes even though their physical attributes have changed between Turnings.

My money is on the idea that RJ meant to indicate that constructs such as Trollocs have animal souls that have been twisted and damaged, which may be inherently different from human souls. The Nym, seeming to be plant constructs with consciousness, seem to be the result of a different process from Trollocs. Perhaps he meant that whatever you could call a "soul" that exists in a conscious being isn't really present in a Trolloc, even though they have certain characteristics of creatures that would possess a spirit. I just think this is inconsistent.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
Some musings on constructs and souls - 28/07/2010 12:07:06 PM 574 Views
I think RJ is inconsistent on the nature of souls and constructs - 28/07/2010 03:00:19 PM 373 Views
Hmm... - 29/07/2010 12:58:57 PM 309 Views
The problem is that by saying a soul can be damaged or corrupted like that, it isn't immortal - 29/07/2010 05:47:04 PM 296 Views
A point... - 01/08/2010 12:43:04 PM 324 Views

Reply to Message