Active Users:1196 Time:23/11/2024 02:53:39 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right Lord Haart Send a noteboard - 27/07/2010 01:56:32 PM
Plot-wise I don't see any sensible reason why RJ would rather literally want a physical link between Moridin and SH (and later also Rand), instead of simply having Mordin & SH work together very closely, because they follow the same philosophy.


It makes sense to me. Moridin is Rand's counterpart - whereas the Creator gives Rand free choice to fight the battle, the DO is an "uber-control freak" (author's words) and it seems weird to me that he would have two different agents (SH and Moridin) when power is always more potent when coming from one person.

Even if SH IS a different entity, I would be surprised if Moridin wasn't in some way infested with the DO's presence. It would be completely out of character for the DO to not have a form of direct control over him.
Reply to message
Moridin & Shadar Haran saidarisnowtainted - 22/07/2010 08:14:27 PM 1547 Views
No... Etzel - 22/07/2010 08:22:52 PM 935 Views
Re: No... saidarisnowtainted - 22/07/2010 09:31:35 PM 848 Views
Don't let her talk you out of it so easily. Give us the reasons behind your theory! Narg - 23/07/2010 03:41:00 AM 811 Views
Re: Don't let her talk you out of it so easily. Give us the reasons behind your theory! saidarisnowtainted - 27/07/2010 04:00:26 PM 647 Views
Re: No...(en garde, Etzellius Maximus!) Mik - 23/07/2010 08:38:26 AM 863 Views
I haven't seen those answers either so I'm interested. I don't think they're the same Deadsy - 23/07/2010 08:49:11 AM 753 Views
Well, I already talked more about it below Etzel - 23/07/2010 09:17:10 AM 958 Views
Re: Well, I already talked more about it below Mik - 23/07/2010 11:29:08 AM 802 Views
Yup, I think they are one and the same. Mik - 23/07/2010 08:21:20 AM 1099 Views
This idea is hardly vindicable Etzel - 23/07/2010 09:12:14 AM 852 Views
Au contraire. Mik - 23/07/2010 11:23:09 AM 949 Views
But why... Etzel - 23/07/2010 11:32:25 AM 809 Views
Re: But why... Lord Haart - 23/07/2010 12:01:00 PM 841 Views
Again. RJ fooled you. Mik - 23/07/2010 12:15:26 PM 852 Views
I think it would have to work this way: Lord Haart - 23/07/2010 03:10:59 PM 795 Views
Your reasoning falls apart right at the start, even though there is some truth to the rest, I think. Mik - 23/07/2010 04:22:22 PM 895 Views
Um not quite Ryan - 25/07/2010 05:47:22 AM 755 Views
Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. Ishamael - 25/07/2010 08:29:18 AM 988 Views
Re: Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. Ishamael - 25/07/2010 08:32:10 AM 1020 Views
I think your evidence is pretty weak... Etzel - 26/07/2010 10:14:01 AM 713 Views
Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? Mik - 26/07/2010 11:58:02 AM 819 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? Etzel - 26/07/2010 12:18:51 PM 812 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 12:43:53 PM 765 Views
Frankly, I don't see any similarity... Etzel - 26/07/2010 01:57:56 PM 835 Views
Re: Frankly, I don't see any similarity... Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 04:09:52 PM 684 Views
The problem is... Etzel - 26/07/2010 04:27:50 PM 640 Views
No problem at all, but your unwillingness to accept the possibilty after all these years. Mik - 27/07/2010 11:38:10 AM 753 Views
I already answered all this... Etzel - 27/07/2010 11:46:36 AM 767 Views
Yeah. And as proven earlier your answers are flat-out wrong. Mik - 27/07/2010 01:17:36 PM 872 Views
I think we have to agree to disagree Etzel - 27/07/2010 01:34:34 PM 708 Views
Agreed then. Mik - 27/07/2010 02:03:52 PM 857 Views
Thanks for those answers. Here's how wrong they actually are: Mik - 26/07/2010 01:54:44 PM 793 Views
No problem Etzel - 26/07/2010 02:30:45 PM 841 Views
Why does that scene matter? Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 04:16:33 PM 729 Views
Dunno, you have to ask Mik about this. *NM* Etzel - 26/07/2010 04:23:19 PM 402 Views
Why the half answer? Here's my full answer and the questions you missed..again.. Mik - 26/07/2010 05:14:00 PM 920 Views
Just to understand you correctly... Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:33:46 PM 760 Views
Sure..I'll answer your questions again.. "quid pro quo"? Mik - 27/07/2010 12:43:21 PM 837 Views
Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right Etzel - 27/07/2010 01:27:05 PM 801 Views
Re: Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right Lord Haart - 27/07/2010 01:56:32 PM 693 Views
The DO has control over Moridin... Etzel - 27/07/2010 02:04:50 PM 648 Views
Uhh. Thanks ..I guess. Mik - 27/07/2010 01:57:38 PM 861 Views
I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: Gher - 26/07/2010 03:53:04 PM 728 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 04:18:40 PM 636 Views
True, but if they're ordering other people to do it anyway... Gher - 26/07/2010 04:51:18 PM 672 Views
One should also remember... Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:06:36 PM 669 Views
Eh? Mik - 26/07/2010 05:30:20 PM 692 Views
But that the killing stopped, doesn't mean at all that Moridin and SH are one creature. *NM* Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:35:02 PM 744 Views
Give me a better reason? Why did RJ make the timing fit and hid it so far apart? Mik - 26/07/2010 05:36:28 PM 777 Views
I think... Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:48:21 PM 594 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: Mik - 26/07/2010 05:22:46 PM 838 Views
Re: This idea is hardly vindicable saidarisnowtainted - 27/07/2010 04:07:53 PM 711 Views
= - Oh and has anyone given thought to Hopper = Bela? Lohikaarme - 27/07/2010 09:17:18 PM 644 Views
Thanks! *bows and tips wide-brimmed hat* Mik - 28/07/2010 07:54:05 AM 871 Views
Not the same individual DomA - 24/07/2010 02:16:01 PM 717 Views
Re: Not the same individual Lord Haart - 24/07/2010 06:07:10 PM 609 Views
Aww Dom. I really hoped you were on the same page.. Mik - 25/07/2010 09:38:35 AM 907 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes