You suggest that Moridin and SH are one creature, fused together like Luc and Isam are, but actually also Ishy and SH 0.5. were already one creature. Your evidence is that the Trollocs named Ishy Ba'alzamon, and consequently he must have a physical link to a Myrddraal. The other evidence is that the Nae'blis is just half a step below the DO, and consequently the DO would fuse himself together with his Nae'blis. Finally, Carrdin was visited by SH 0.5. but after Ishy's death, Carridin was left alone for some reason, which is obviously that Ishy and SH 0.5. were one creature.
Irrespective if this evidence is in any way convincing, or if it couldn't be explained in more reasonable ways (namely that Moridin and SH are simply closely working together and not physically linked), you have to note that if we read Moridin's or SH's PoV neither indicates at all that both are one being (if we read Isam's/Luc's it's immediately made clear that they are fused together). In the same way, the authors always distinguish between SH and Moridin in their statements. Why do you think, they would fool us that way, just for a lame twist?
Irrespective if this evidence is in any way convincing, or if it couldn't be explained in more reasonable ways (namely that Moridin and SH are simply closely working together and not physically linked), you have to note that if we read Moridin's or SH's PoV neither indicates at all that both are one being (if we read Isam's/Luc's it's immediately made clear that they are fused together). In the same way, the authors always distinguish between SH and Moridin in their statements. Why do you think, they would fool us that way, just for a lame twist?
Moridin & Shadar Haran
22/07/2010 08:14:27 PM
- 1546 Views
No...
22/07/2010 08:22:52 PM
- 935 Views
Re: No...
22/07/2010 09:31:35 PM
- 848 Views
Don't let her talk you out of it so easily. Give us the reasons behind your theory!
23/07/2010 03:41:00 AM
- 811 Views
Re: Don't let her talk you out of it so easily. Give us the reasons behind your theory!
27/07/2010 04:00:26 PM
- 647 Views
Re: No...(en garde, Etzellius Maximus!)
23/07/2010 08:38:26 AM
- 862 Views
I haven't seen those answers either so I'm interested. I don't think they're the same
23/07/2010 08:49:11 AM
- 753 Views
Yup, I think they are one and the same.
23/07/2010 08:21:20 AM
- 1099 Views
This idea is hardly vindicable
23/07/2010 09:12:14 AM
- 852 Views
Au contraire.
23/07/2010 11:23:09 AM
- 949 Views
But why...
23/07/2010 11:32:25 AM
- 808 Views
Again. RJ fooled you.
23/07/2010 12:15:26 PM
- 852 Views
I think it would have to work this way:
23/07/2010 03:10:59 PM
- 795 Views
Your reasoning falls apart right at the start, even though there is some truth to the rest, I think.
23/07/2010 04:22:22 PM
- 894 Views
Um not quite
25/07/2010 05:47:22 AM
- 755 Views
I think your evidence is pretty weak...
26/07/2010 10:14:01 AM
- 712 Views
Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..?
26/07/2010 11:58:02 AM
- 819 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..?
26/07/2010 12:18:51 PM
- 811 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..?
26/07/2010 12:43:53 PM
- 765 Views
Frankly, I don't see any similarity...
26/07/2010 01:57:56 PM
- 834 Views
Re: Frankly, I don't see any similarity...
26/07/2010 04:09:52 PM
- 684 Views
The problem is...
26/07/2010 04:27:50 PM
- 640 Views
No problem at all, but your unwillingness to accept the possibilty after all these years.
27/07/2010 11:38:10 AM
- 753 Views
I already answered all this...
27/07/2010 11:46:36 AM
- 767 Views
Yeah. And as proven earlier your answers are flat-out wrong.
27/07/2010 01:17:36 PM
- 872 Views
Thanks for those answers. Here's how wrong they actually are:
26/07/2010 01:54:44 PM
- 793 Views
No problem
26/07/2010 02:30:45 PM
- 841 Views
Why the half answer? Here's my full answer and the questions you missed..again..
26/07/2010 05:14:00 PM
- 920 Views
Just to understand you correctly...
26/07/2010 05:33:46 PM
- 760 Views
Sure..I'll answer your questions again.. "quid pro quo"?
27/07/2010 12:43:21 PM
- 836 Views
Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right
27/07/2010 01:27:05 PM
- 801 Views
I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing:
26/07/2010 03:53:04 PM
- 728 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing:
26/07/2010 04:18:40 PM
- 636 Views
One should also remember...
26/07/2010 05:06:36 PM
- 669 Views
Eh?
26/07/2010 05:30:20 PM
- 692 Views
But that the killing stopped, doesn't mean at all that Moridin and SH are one creature. *NM*
26/07/2010 05:35:02 PM
- 744 Views
Give me a better reason? Why did RJ make the timing fit and hid it so far apart?
26/07/2010 05:36:28 PM
- 777 Views