Active Users:1149 Time:23/11/2024 03:21:32 AM
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? Etzel Send a noteboard - 26/07/2010 12:18:51 PM
1: Why did the killing of Carridins family stop for 2 months right after Ishamael died, while SHv0.5 made that promise and it was SHv0.5 that was carrying it out up untill that point? Note that this promise wasn't forgotten at all and that -in the end- Moridin ordered Carridin had to be killed according to SHv0.5's promise.


As far as we know, SH 0.5. was at some point disposed of. Later, apparently when Ishy wasn't already transmigrated, the DO managed to get it right.

2: Explain to me how the Watcher could be Moridin when The Watcher "ghosted soundlesly through the trees", following two very experienced channelers holding the Source (thus having heightened senses) in a leafless forest at noon, littered with brown leaves where those two channelers stumble around to just to keep their balance. (ACoS - Patterns within Patterns)


Moridin is wearing fancloth as the watcher, and it is pointed out that the watcher is sneaking. SH wouldn't need that, he can lurk in the shadows. SH also doesn't have eyebrows and eyes, contrary to the watcher, as it is explicitely mentioned.

3: Explain to me if the Watcher is Moridin how he noticed that(apparently from some distance) Sammy had let the link between himself and Granny dissolve? Note that the Watcher also knew that both Sammy and Granny still held on to the Source.


Moridin can sense saidin and see it glow around Sammael. The typical "prickling" tells him about saidar, as it is explicitely mentioned.

4: How could the Watcher tell Sammy held the Source in the first place, given the Watcher was following the deadly duo by Grandaels easy-to-follow shiny red dress (indicating a fairly big distance).


The watcher obviously wasn't that far away.

If you compare the watcher's PoV with others from Moridin, it's absolutely clear that Moridin is the watcher. It can't be SH, because SH doesn't have eyes & eyebrows, doesn't need fancloth and isn't that aware of the OP.
Reply to message
Moridin & Shadar Haran - 22/07/2010 08:14:27 PM 1548 Views
No... - 22/07/2010 08:22:52 PM 935 Views
Re: No... - 22/07/2010 09:31:35 PM 849 Views
Re: No...(en garde, Etzellius Maximus!) - 23/07/2010 08:38:26 AM 864 Views
Well, I already talked more about it below - 23/07/2010 09:17:10 AM 960 Views
Re: Well, I already talked more about it below - 23/07/2010 11:29:08 AM 803 Views
Yup, I think they are one and the same. - 23/07/2010 08:21:20 AM 1100 Views
This idea is hardly vindicable - 23/07/2010 09:12:14 AM 852 Views
Au contraire. - 23/07/2010 11:23:09 AM 951 Views
But why... - 23/07/2010 11:32:25 AM 810 Views
Re: But why... - 23/07/2010 12:01:00 PM 842 Views
Again. RJ fooled you. - 23/07/2010 12:15:26 PM 854 Views
I think it would have to work this way: - 23/07/2010 03:10:59 PM 795 Views
Your reasoning falls apart right at the start, even though there is some truth to the rest, I think. - 23/07/2010 04:22:22 PM 895 Views
Um not quite - 25/07/2010 05:47:22 AM 755 Views
Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. - 25/07/2010 08:29:18 AM 988 Views
Re: Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. - 25/07/2010 08:32:10 AM 1020 Views
I think your evidence is pretty weak... - 26/07/2010 10:14:01 AM 713 Views
Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? - 26/07/2010 11:58:02 AM 819 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? - 26/07/2010 12:18:51 PM 813 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? - 26/07/2010 12:43:53 PM 766 Views
Frankly, I don't see any similarity... - 26/07/2010 01:57:56 PM 836 Views
Re: Frankly, I don't see any similarity... - 26/07/2010 04:09:52 PM 685 Views
The problem is... - 26/07/2010 04:27:50 PM 642 Views
No problem at all, but your unwillingness to accept the possibilty after all these years. - 27/07/2010 11:38:10 AM 754 Views
I already answered all this... - 27/07/2010 11:46:36 AM 768 Views
Yeah. And as proven earlier your answers are flat-out wrong. - 27/07/2010 01:17:36 PM 873 Views
I think we have to agree to disagree - 27/07/2010 01:34:34 PM 709 Views
Agreed then. - 27/07/2010 02:03:52 PM 858 Views
Thanks for those answers. Here's how wrong they actually are: - 26/07/2010 01:54:44 PM 795 Views
No problem - 26/07/2010 02:30:45 PM 842 Views
Why does that scene matter? - 26/07/2010 04:16:33 PM 730 Views
Dunno, you have to ask Mik about this. *NM* - 26/07/2010 04:23:19 PM 402 Views
Why the half answer? Here's my full answer and the questions you missed..again.. - 26/07/2010 05:14:00 PM 920 Views
Just to understand you correctly... - 26/07/2010 05:33:46 PM 760 Views
Sure..I'll answer your questions again.. "quid pro quo"? - 27/07/2010 12:43:21 PM 838 Views
Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right - 27/07/2010 01:27:05 PM 803 Views
Re: Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right - 27/07/2010 01:56:32 PM 694 Views
The DO has control over Moridin... - 27/07/2010 02:04:50 PM 650 Views
Uhh. Thanks ..I guess. - 27/07/2010 01:57:38 PM 863 Views
I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: - 26/07/2010 03:53:04 PM 729 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: - 26/07/2010 04:18:40 PM 637 Views
True, but if they're ordering other people to do it anyway... - 26/07/2010 04:51:18 PM 674 Views
One should also remember... - 26/07/2010 05:06:36 PM 670 Views
Eh? - 26/07/2010 05:30:20 PM 694 Views
But that the killing stopped, doesn't mean at all that Moridin and SH are one creature. *NM* - 26/07/2010 05:35:02 PM 745 Views
Give me a better reason? Why did RJ make the timing fit and hid it so far apart? - 26/07/2010 05:36:28 PM 779 Views
I think... - 26/07/2010 05:48:21 PM 595 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: - 26/07/2010 05:22:46 PM 838 Views
Re: This idea is hardly vindicable - 27/07/2010 04:07:53 PM 712 Views
= - Oh and has anyone given thought to Hopper = Bela? - 27/07/2010 09:17:18 PM 644 Views
Thanks! *bows and tips wide-brimmed hat* - 28/07/2010 07:54:05 AM 872 Views
Not the same individual - 24/07/2010 02:16:01 PM 719 Views
Re: Not the same individual - 24/07/2010 06:07:10 PM 610 Views
Aww Dom. I really hoped you were on the same page.. - 25/07/2010 09:38:35 AM 908 Views

Reply to Message