Active Users:462 Time:04/04/2025 10:44:33 PM
I don't know if Semirhage was sacrificed or not. Either way the Semirhage quote set up tGS 6 books RabidWombat Send a noteboard - 26/07/2010 02:29:59 AM
It makes no real sense that the Moridin first wanted Semirhage to capture Rand with the DB in KoD (as stated in TGS, prologue). Then SH actually frees Semirhage to try it again. Exactly in the moment, when she succeeds, when Rand is breaking, since he is killing Min, the DO would prevent this by saving Min and killing Semirhage due to giving Rand access to the TP.

It makes more sense that Rand managed to take the TP through the link to Moridin and that the Shadow couldn't foresee this. If Rand wouldn't have done this, the Shadow had likely won, because Rand would be a prisoner at SG, tortured by Semirhage, and Min dead.


I don't know if Semirhage was sacrificed or not. Either way the Semirhage quote set up tGS 6 books later. I think that is pretty impressive. Maybe RJ wanted to mislead us by that quote or maybe he wanted it to be a hint about the DOs true involvement. Semirhage believed that the DO betrayed her and the end result of the exchange seems to me to be in the DOs favor even if he didn't plan it that way. I agree also with what you are saying as well, though.

To me there is not enough evidence to figure out what the DOs involvement is. Hopefully, we will get a Moridin PoV or some other evidence to answer this question.

Reply to message
foreshadowing of Semirhage's death - 25/07/2010 07:13:48 AM 1651 Views
I don't think that Semirhage was sacrificed - 25/07/2010 08:36:47 AM 858 Views
No, too tired to give reasons... *NM* - 25/07/2010 09:30:46 AM 270 Views
Re: No, too tired to give reasons... *NM* - 26/07/2010 01:19:26 AM 273 Views
I disagree about the TP aspect - 25/07/2010 03:30:37 PM 767 Views
Re: I disagree about the TP aspect - 25/07/2010 04:03:45 PM 754 Views
It's an interesting theory in either direction - 25/07/2010 04:54:31 PM 693 Views
Re: It's an interesting theory in either direction - 26/07/2010 02:17:35 AM 557 Views
You can't expect BS to give away things with 2 books to go. - 26/07/2010 01:48:37 AM 630 Views
Re: You can't expect BS to give away things with 2 books to go. - 26/07/2010 02:24:29 AM 587 Views
Re: I disagree about the TP aspect - 26/07/2010 01:22:30 AM 590 Views
Re: I disagree about the TP aspect - 26/07/2010 02:30:11 AM 560 Views
^^^what Datakim said^^^ - 26/07/2010 06:58:02 PM 584 Views
I don't know if Semirhage was sacrificed or not. Either way the Semirhage quote set up tGS 6 books - 26/07/2010 02:29:59 AM 663 Views
You were right the first time - 26/07/2010 03:02:22 AM 685 Views
I think the question is... - 26/07/2010 08:27:17 AM 606 Views
Re: I think the question is... - 27/07/2010 12:43:44 AM 598 Views
Re: I think the question is... - 27/07/2010 01:15:29 AM 611 Views
Re: I think the question is... - 27/07/2010 02:10:41 AM 583 Views
Re: I think the question is... - 27/07/2010 03:17:01 AM 648 Views
Re: I think the question is... - 27/07/2010 05:08:59 AM 659 Views
Re: I think the question is... - 27/07/2010 05:59:37 PM 609 Views
I'd say that there was a pre-meditated plan or backup plan to sacrifice Semirhage - 26/07/2010 09:02:44 AM 646 Views
I think SH simply didn't care about the CK access key - 26/07/2010 09:17:11 AM 570 Views
Re: I think SH simply didn't care about the CK access key - 26/07/2010 12:10:43 PM 574 Views
Re: I think SH simply didn't care about the CK access key - 26/07/2010 12:27:11 PM 652 Views
But if this was the plan... - 26/07/2010 12:30:37 PM 567 Views
Moridin and SH knew that the CK could never defeat the dark one so they were happy to leave it - 26/07/2010 05:56:56 PM 638 Views
Unlikely, and stupid if true - 26/07/2010 06:12:30 PM 584 Views
That wasn't the Choedan Kal, that was Shadar Logoth. - 27/07/2010 12:11:46 AM 534 Views
Re: That wasn't the Choedan Kal, that was Shadar Logoth. - 27/07/2010 01:29:29 AM 553 Views
I fail to see the relevance. *NM* - 27/07/2010 02:06:27 AM 254 Views
the relevance is that it was impossible without the CK - 27/07/2010 05:25:45 AM 505 Views
Are you certain? - 27/07/2010 05:37:28 AM 555 Views
Re: Are you certain? - 27/07/2010 03:00:51 PM 595 Views
Re: Are you certain? - 27/07/2010 06:17:59 PM 549 Views
key word is "necessary" *NM* - 27/07/2010 05:14:19 AM 231 Views
Re: Unlikely, and stupid if true - 27/07/2010 01:36:53 AM 528 Views
Re: Unlikely, and stupid if true - 27/07/2010 02:19:22 AM 559 Views
Re: Unlikely, and stupid if true - 27/07/2010 02:43:39 AM 575 Views
Re: Unlikely, and stupid if true - 27/07/2010 03:17:49 AM 590 Views
Re: Unlikely, and stupid if true - 27/07/2010 03:39:07 AM 566 Views
Re: Unlikely, and stupid if true - 27/07/2010 04:26:31 AM 581 Views
Something still doesn't make sense in that theory though - 27/07/2010 07:15:22 AM 653 Views
Re: Unlikely, and stupid if true - 27/07/2010 01:44:19 AM 604 Views
Re: Unlikely, and stupid if true - 27/07/2010 05:31:03 AM 531 Views
Re: Unlikely, and stupid if true - 27/07/2010 03:53:20 PM 569 Views
??? The CK in the hands of a madman is exactly what the Dark One needs to destroy the pattern - 27/07/2010 07:01:13 AM 579 Views
So why not give it to Moridin then? - 27/07/2010 10:54:47 AM 580 Views
Re: I think SH simply didn't care about the CK access key - 27/07/2010 12:10:01 AM 533 Views
This has been seen and commented before, by myself and others. - 26/07/2010 03:36:51 PM 548 Views
Sorry I missed them. I would have been happy enough to comment there. - 27/07/2010 03:43:46 AM 562 Views
Considering there are years and years worth of comments... - 27/07/2010 02:49:42 PM 527 Views
Hands up if you don't believe in foreshadowing in this series - 26/07/2010 04:27:14 PM 574 Views
Re: Hands up if you don't believe in foreshadowing in this series - 26/07/2010 10:34:18 PM 521 Views
Prophesying, but not foreshadowing. - 27/07/2010 12:06:06 AM 495 Views
You confuse foreshadowing and predictability - 27/07/2010 02:57:15 AM 854 Views
I agree with DomA *NM* *NM* - 27/07/2010 03:44:51 AM 252 Views
I don't believe in foreshadowing that you can figure out from the actual plot. - 27/07/2010 08:42:11 PM 537 Views

Reply to Message