Active Users:554 Time:05/04/2025 12:32:17 PM
There is no indication that Graendal & Aran'gar did anything, except for exchanging infos! Etzel Send a noteboard - 15/07/2010 09:01:58 AM
Therefore, also the idea that Aran'gar and Delana would suddenly live in Graendal's palace is completely unsupported and unlikely (IMO, even absurd) speculation.

BS can answer plot points in other ways than bringing a character back in such a scene before the death. That would at least fit with the way the series is written.
Reply to message
Chat with Brandon posted on Dragonmount - 12/07/2010 04:23:24 PM 2029 Views
This... - 12/07/2010 04:54:28 PM 1174 Views
how do you get there from this? - 12/07/2010 05:47:42 PM 1024 Views
Right. There could easily be a scene like this: - 12/07/2010 06:22:45 PM 955 Views
Because... - 12/07/2010 10:40:29 PM 984 Views
You're brilliant, Etzel, but Brandon is NOT robert jordan - 13/07/2010 01:18:44 AM 930 Views
He said it won't be 100% flashback like book 10 - 13/07/2010 05:30:18 AM 831 Views
But obviously not for the timelines, which are up to date. - 13/07/2010 08:41:37 AM 953 Views
the only reason you say this is because you think it makes Slayer - 14/07/2010 02:39:52 AM 935 Views
No... - 14/07/2010 08:10:12 AM 825 Views
so it's not possible for anything that has never been done in the series to happen... ok - 14/07/2010 02:38:08 PM 799 Views
Again, there is no sensible reason for a scene where Graendal is shown again before her death. *NM* - 14/07/2010 04:47:21 PM 764 Views
sure there is ... to tell us she killed Asmo - 14/07/2010 04:56:09 PM 964 Views
Again... - 15/07/2010 08:57:34 AM 727 Views
or it could as easily be a scene from Aran'gar's POV that includes Graendal - 15/07/2010 01:36:21 PM 891 Views
The point is... - 15/07/2010 01:55:43 PM 815 Views
that is 100% your interpretation - 15/07/2010 02:51:49 PM 847 Views
Noal was involved with Ishy; a connection to Graendal is pure speculation. - 15/07/2010 03:19:38 PM 755 Views
I'm pointing out that she had more than just Rands plot line - 15/07/2010 03:59:36 PM 754 Views
As far as we know... - 15/07/2010 04:06:56 PM 807 Views
she also knows what Cyndane and Moghedien are up to and may be involved - 16/07/2010 01:58:36 PM 968 Views
There is nothing to support your view, that Graendal was directly involved in any other plotlines... - 16/07/2010 02:31:01 PM 731 Views
She doesn't have to be in order to make an appearance in them - 16/07/2010 03:26:44 PM 864 Views
We will see... *NM* - 16/07/2010 03:36:21 PM 1057 Views
Indeed - 13/07/2010 08:49:43 AM 781 Views
The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet... - 13/07/2010 09:14:04 AM 967 Views
Re: The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet... - 13/07/2010 10:03:14 AM 894 Views
It's completely unlikely and unnecessary - 13/07/2010 10:25:36 AM 960 Views
you keep trotting this point out like it matters - 14/07/2010 09:07:36 PM 850 Views
a very irritating habit indeed!! - 15/07/2010 05:29:19 AM 953 Views
There is no indication that Graendal & Aran'gar did anything, except for exchanging infos! - 15/07/2010 09:01:58 AM 776 Views
where do you get this stuff from? - 15/07/2010 01:41:07 PM 987 Views
Eh, no - 15/07/2010 02:08:56 PM 843 Views
I disagree - 15/07/2010 02:56:02 PM 807 Views
Graendal actually tells that she learned interesting things from Aran'gar - 15/07/2010 03:14:54 PM 926 Views
pure interpretation - 15/07/2010 04:00:31 PM 865 Views
Well, it fits RJ's theme that the bad guys actually aren't that competent. *NM* - 15/07/2010 04:12:19 PM 930 Views
No really since it would make Aran'gar look pretty competent *NM* - 16/07/2010 03:27:40 PM 375 Views
Aran'gar just had the luck that Rand wasn't after her - 16/07/2010 03:34:53 PM 663 Views
Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 15/07/2010 06:54:17 PM 785 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 15/07/2010 10:08:44 PM 834 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 16/07/2010 05:30:25 AM 789 Views
IMO... - 16/07/2010 08:46:03 AM 733 Views
And... - 16/07/2010 11:35:44 AM 856 Views
you continue to ignore that Graendal died about 2 months after she - 16/07/2010 02:06:48 PM 875 Views
Usually the Forsaken meet in neutral TAR... - 16/07/2010 02:22:34 PM 923 Views
not really - 16/07/2010 03:58:57 PM 998 Views
Good, then we agree, if you consider it unlikely as well. *NM* - 16/07/2010 05:56:50 PM 974 Views
Trust me, Graendal won't be seen; only her name will be mentioned a few times (as BS said). *NM* - 15/07/2010 09:03:33 AM 851 Views
You should really just write it for BS since you clearly know exactly what's going to happen - 15/07/2010 02:57:59 PM 856 Views
Ok... - 15/07/2010 03:17:02 PM 771 Views
When did I say there would be a Graendal POV? - 15/07/2010 04:03:54 PM 841 Views
I also just said that... - 15/07/2010 04:10:32 PM 741 Views
Re: It's completely unlikely and unnecessary - 14/07/2010 10:10:48 PM 790 Views
But we never... - 15/07/2010 09:17:30 AM 840 Views
Re: But we never... - 15/07/2010 10:52:24 PM 808 Views
I think - 16/07/2010 09:30:46 AM 906 Views
Re: I think - 16/07/2010 04:37:20 PM 902 Views
Because some people can't read... - 14/07/2010 01:05:08 PM 928 Views
Re: Because some people can't read... - 14/07/2010 09:14:27 PM 723 Views
Re: Because some people can't read... - 15/07/2010 05:31:22 AM 738 Views
I wonder if their big role means Rand and Eg will get more chapters than first thought. *NM* - 12/07/2010 05:27:44 PM 882 Views
Yeah, seems so. *NM* - 13/07/2010 12:19:53 PM 843 Views
Brandon's "Mostly" answer makes it less likely we see the Land of Madmen as Demandred's base - 12/07/2010 07:36:49 PM 999 Views
hrmm, not necessarily - 12/07/2010 09:28:00 PM 796 Views
I agree. *NM* - 13/07/2010 12:24:21 PM 410 Views
Uh... - 12/07/2010 10:10:08 PM 921 Views
or "can't" because ... - 12/07/2010 10:34:14 PM 785 Views
Re: or "can't" because ... - 13/07/2010 01:00:45 AM 804 Views
I think he isn't allowed to... - 13/07/2010 12:23:55 PM 927 Views
Perrin catch-up? - 13/07/2010 02:55:22 AM 716 Views
We will get it on screen - 13/07/2010 03:30:33 AM 803 Views
On Mat's "death" - 13/07/2010 12:34:35 PM 1027 Views
Re: On Mat's "death" - 13/07/2010 02:23:19 PM 739 Views
This report was probably a misinterpretation - 14/07/2010 08:23:24 AM 855 Views
Re: This report was probably a misinterpretation - 14/07/2010 10:03:36 PM 889 Views
I emailed BS and he sent me copies of both the books he mentioned in the Q&A! - 14/07/2010 08:32:58 PM 803 Views

Reply to Message