Active Users:409 Time:04/04/2025 12:55:33 PM
Ockham's Razor Kieran Send a noteboard - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM
Ok let's look at this again,

Name of possible source: Artur Paendrag Tanreall

Name of character he is a type and shadow of: Arthur Pendragon

Arthur means: Long Bear.
Pendragon means: Head of the dragon.

Arthur's father Uther Pendraon's banner: Golden Dragon

Of course we know that Rand AL'THOR also draws symbolism from Mr sword in the stone. Does that mean that only he can have a dragon banner? No, of course not, several of the characters in the WoT world draw from the same sources. If fact even from Arthurian legends there were several people who have a dragon on their banner. Since a particular animal generally is put on a banner to claim a certain characteristic for it's owner, it seems inevitable that the dragon will come up multiple times.

So anyway...maybe thats why he would have a sword with the symbol of the person he symbolizes.
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1259 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 734 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 766 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 681 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 677 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 735 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 726 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 683 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 658 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 709 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 811 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 685 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 652 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 618 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 697 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 619 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 583 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 672 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 809 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 744 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 671 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 665 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 681 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 633 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 615 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1123 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 699 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 650 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 602 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 649 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 615 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 719 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 690 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 656 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 635 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 641 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 606 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 680 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 735 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 719 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 648 Views

Reply to Message