Active Users:967 Time:15/11/2024 08:33:51 AM
Ockham's Razor Kieran Send a noteboard - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM
Ok let's look at this again,

Name of possible source: Artur Paendrag Tanreall

Name of character he is a type and shadow of: Arthur Pendragon

Arthur means: Long Bear.
Pendragon means: Head of the dragon.

Arthur's father Uther Pendraon's banner: Golden Dragon

Of course we know that Rand AL'THOR also draws symbolism from Mr sword in the stone. Does that mean that only he can have a dragon banner? No, of course not, several of the characters in the WoT world draw from the same sources. If fact even from Arthurian legends there were several people who have a dragon on their banner. Since a particular animal generally is put on a banner to claim a certain characteristic for it's owner, it seems inevitable that the dragon will come up multiple times.

So anyway...maybe thats why he would have a sword with the symbol of the person he symbolizes.
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1169 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 652 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 669 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 588 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 590 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 648 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 644 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 598 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 568 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 619 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 718 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 597 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 557 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 527 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 636 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 529 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 505 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 587 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 723 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 651 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 588 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 577 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 588 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 541 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 529 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1029 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 614 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 568 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 518 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 569 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 531 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 620 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 603 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 569 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 546 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 556 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 522 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 597 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 646 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 629 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 565 Views

Reply to Message