Active Users:490 Time:28/09/2024 04:50:00 AM
Nope. 6 Aes Sedai couldn't take Raolain Darksbane or Yurian Stonebow...Semirhage = 3 Aes Sedai Shannow Send a noteboard - 15/06/2010 08:26:21 PM
Lanfear alone was able to shield Rand, except that he sliced her weaves. There's no way 3xSemirhage=Lanfear.

Its closer to Semirhage almost=Lanfear. Thus, Semi alone should have a decent chance of Shielding Rand, and linked to a weak Aes Sedai, she definitely will be able to.


Loial states quite clearly that 6 Aes Sedai were unable to take Raolain Darksbane or Yurian Stonebow. And that was more than 1000 years ago. We know Aes Sedai have been growing progressively weaker as time went by, so those Aes Sedai would have been stronger than Aes Sedai of today.

From what we know so far it seems likely that Semirhage is approximately the equivalent of 3 average modern Aes Sedai.

Which would mean that 2 Semirhage's would equal approximately 6 Aes Sedai in strength. MODERN AES SEDAI, mind you, not the equivalent of the Aes Sedai in Darksbane or Stonebow's times.

So if 6 ancient Aes Sedai were not strong enough to take those two false Dragons, then 2 Semirhage's won't be strong enough to take Rand either. Not when he is at his full potential.

So you would in fact need 3 Semirhage's do the job.

In fact, Rand might well be stronger than Darksbane and Stonebow, meaning that 7 Aes Sedai would not be able to take him either. In fact, you may need 8 or 9 Aes Sedai to take him.

Meaning that Lews Therin was perfectly correct when he said it would take 3 Semirhage's and Mesaana's to shield him from the Source if he was already holding the Power.
Reply to message
No three women could block him from the Source... - 15/06/2010 06:52:17 PM 1930 Views
I think that is total BS, since the books have proved otherwise more than once... - 15/06/2010 07:22:16 PM 1007 Views
I think he means that it would take three such women to smother him - 15/06/2010 07:45:03 PM 1069 Views
Ahhh... I can kind of agree with that... - 15/06/2010 08:05:46 PM 1137 Views
Yes, that is what he meant. Another interesting twist... - 16/06/2010 01:34:18 AM 1117 Views
Agreed. Good analysis. - 16/06/2010 07:48:36 AM 1092 Views
Re: I think that is total BS, since the books have proved otherwise more than once... - 15/06/2010 08:17:47 PM 1025 Views
Huh? - 15/06/2010 08:19:21 PM 1130 Views
Re: Huh? - 15/06/2010 08:31:17 PM 952 Views
- 15/06/2010 08:43:12 PM 1031 Views
Re: - 15/06/2010 08:47:05 PM 861 Views
No, this is before. - 15/06/2010 08:49:13 PM 939 Views
Well that's a different quote from the one you used before, and this one shows Lanfear not succeedin - 15/06/2010 08:52:00 PM 936 Views
I never used a quote before. And there's no quote where Lanfear's shield is not succeeding. - 15/06/2010 08:52:28 PM 813 Views
Simple answer to settle it: - 15/06/2010 09:00:22 PM 831 Views
So Talaan is God? - 15/06/2010 09:04:44 PM 991 Views
It Rand had half Lews Therin's skill at the time, she would stand no chance..SKILL was her advantage - 15/06/2010 09:08:41 PM 944 Views
Skill has nothing to do with how strong a person is. - 15/06/2010 09:11:13 PM 916 Views
So? - 15/06/2010 09:15:01 PM 897 Views
Nope, YOU said he was talking about smothering him, whatever that's supposed to mean... - 15/06/2010 09:26:53 PM 861 Views
Oh My God! That's such utter tripe... EDIT... - 15/06/2010 09:30:29 PM 959 Views
That's exactly how I understood you. - 15/06/2010 09:30:42 PM 802 Views
Nope. 6 Aes Sedai couldn't take Raolain Darksbane or Yurian Stonebow...Semirhage = 3 Aes Sedai - 15/06/2010 08:26:21 PM 873 Views
Lanfear can do it alone - 15/06/2010 08:45:09 PM 876 Views
She ATTEMPTS to cut him off, when he is not at full strength or full training yet... - 15/06/2010 08:55:39 PM 845 Views
Bah! - 15/06/2010 08:58:26 PM 875 Views
I repeat: You cannot shield someone unless you are significantly stronger than they are... - 15/06/2010 09:02:55 PM 828 Views
Explain Talaan shielding Nynaeve then. Or the two BA shielding her. - 15/06/2010 09:05:21 PM 1815 Views
It becomes a battle of skill then... - 15/06/2010 09:09:42 PM 987 Views
BUT... - 15/06/2010 09:12:47 PM 906 Views
Re: "he would have had no need to cut her weaves" - 15/06/2010 09:03:39 PM 836 Views
No. There's a difference. - 15/06/2010 09:07:09 PM 1005 Views
Oh come on... - 15/06/2010 08:48:56 PM 1041 Views
I know you are not that ignorant... - 15/06/2010 09:07:02 PM 810 Views
But that isn't true... - 15/06/2010 09:10:37 PM 853 Views
Let me spell it out for you... - 15/06/2010 09:18:04 PM 871 Views
Re: Let me spell it out for you... - 15/06/2010 09:21:02 PM 850 Views
Don't put words in my, or Lews Therin's, mouth... - 15/06/2010 09:33:50 PM 1011 Views
??? - 15/06/2010 10:43:28 PM 1006 Views
+1. It ridiculous comparison. Rand even didn't know how to shield a woman. - 15/06/2010 09:22:22 PM 896 Views
Now that's a ridiculous comparison - 15/06/2010 09:24:45 PM 979 Views
Exactly! - 15/06/2010 09:28:20 PM 999 Views
Touchy point, heh? - 15/06/2010 09:28:47 PM 935 Views
Then how come Lanfear never died? We know she made attempts to capture him. - 15/06/2010 09:31:20 PM 911 Views
Whom? LTT? Can you elaborate? - 15/06/2010 09:33:25 PM 967 Views
If you wish... - 15/06/2010 09:34:38 PM 720 Views
Re: If you wish... - 15/06/2010 09:36:30 PM 729 Views
Whyever not? - 15/06/2010 09:39:22 PM 807 Views
Re: Whyever not? - 15/06/2010 09:41:22 PM 686 Views
Even in that situation - 15/06/2010 09:43:04 PM 944 Views
Re: Even in that situation - 15/06/2010 09:47:36 PM 961 Views
Okay... - 15/06/2010 09:59:36 PM 893 Views
Re: Okay... - 15/06/2010 10:39:01 PM 889 Views
So, if it doesn't agree with your view, its fuzzy, even when that is what the books say? *NM* - 15/06/2010 10:42:48 PM 529 Views
What? - 15/06/2010 10:45:16 PM 814 Views
If we use your interpretation of the statements. *NM* - 15/06/2010 10:49:21 PM 437 Views
Re: If we use your interpretation of the statements. - 15/06/2010 10:54:48 PM 748 Views
Okay, here's what I think you're saying... - 15/06/2010 11:00:19 PM 914 Views
Re: Okay, here's what I think you're saying... - 15/06/2010 11:10:57 PM 862 Views
Sorry for the mixup... BUT... - 16/06/2010 12:28:31 AM 941 Views
I cannot believe you're so obtuse... or then again, I can. - 15/06/2010 09:26:04 PM 971 Views
About how strong you have to be to shield someone... - 15/06/2010 09:14:31 PM 682 Views
Re: No three women could block him from the Source... - 16/06/2010 04:00:00 PM 811 Views
+1 - 16/06/2010 05:54:51 PM 884 Views
- 16/06/2010 08:48:39 PM 1062 Views
Re: - 16/06/2010 08:56:31 PM 745 Views
indeed you have - 16/06/2010 09:34:22 PM 979 Views
Bad analogy... - 17/06/2010 04:23:31 AM 775 Views
Uh... - 17/06/2010 09:08:01 AM 856 Views
I disagree. - 16/06/2010 04:03:52 PM 960 Views
That's wrong. Rand said 2 AS + Moghedien could threaten him - 16/06/2010 05:17:33 PM 938 Views
Huh. I forgot about that. - 17/06/2010 04:29:38 PM 1004 Views
go back a few posts... - 17/06/2010 03:41:42 AM 864 Views
yet Nynaeve and Talaan can shield one another - 17/06/2010 05:57:09 AM 874 Views
I'd like to think Egwene, Elayne and Aviendha could - 17/06/2010 04:19:22 PM 804 Views
Agreed - 17/06/2010 05:59:39 PM 699 Views
I don't think there's any theme - 17/06/2010 08:25:52 PM 991 Views
I don't think they are meant to controll him in someway - 17/06/2010 10:21:09 PM 871 Views
They have a separate trinity. - 18/06/2010 06:51:27 PM 882 Views
They might be able to, but then they are not 3 women of <b>average AS</b> strength - 17/06/2010 07:10:14 PM 836 Views
They would be far more than 3 average AS - 17/06/2010 08:07:30 PM 851 Views
No, that's not right either. - 18/06/2010 12:37:37 AM 910 Views
I disagree - 18/06/2010 06:07:10 AM 989 Views
Another related quote - 18/06/2010 07:49:33 PM 853 Views
well, in the same book about 5 minutes after Lanfear almost kicks Rands ass - 18/06/2010 08:11:49 PM 904 Views

Reply to Message