Active Users:1284 Time:23/11/2024 06:44:35 AM
Rand himself muses in TGS about his lost hand Etzel Send a noteboard - 14/06/2010 01:09:11 PM
"Two hands. One to destroy, the other to save. Which had he lost?"

In the end of the book, one could say he "lost" the hand to destroy, namely the male Choedan Kal.

Besides that, one could also say that Taim was Rand's "hand" at the BT. It's clear that he will lose him alongside Taim's ca. 100 cronies.

Finally, Rand might also lose parts of his empire to the Shadow or the Seanchan.

Of course, the reason for the hand losing was to make Rand more like the Norse God Tyr.
Reply to message
The Dragon is one with the land, and the land is one with the Dragon - 13/06/2010 04:37:09 AM 1433 Views
The hand - 13/06/2010 05:02:51 AM 653 Views
Could have something to do with Mat or Perrin - 13/06/2010 05:12:19 AM 658 Views
Re: Could have something to do with Mat or Perrin - 13/06/2010 09:24:51 AM 585 Views
Maybe the wounds indicate that they all need to work together. *NM* - 15/06/2010 02:28:25 AM 397 Views
My own "maybe" - 13/06/2010 06:37:43 AM 648 Views
Re: The Dragon is one with the land, and the land is one with the Dragon - 13/06/2010 07:53:00 AM 691 Views
You're no fun - 13/06/2010 08:39:10 AM 690 Views
hrmm - 14/06/2010 03:01:33 AM 563 Views
Re: You're no fun - 14/06/2010 07:11:53 PM 604 Views
wound not related to Taim or Masema - 14/06/2010 08:42:16 PM 614 Views
Re: wound not related to Taim or Masema - 14/06/2010 10:52:09 PM 784 Views
Re: wound not related to Taim or Masema - 15/06/2010 12:19:20 AM 568 Views
I agree. - 14/06/2010 10:24:04 PM 501 Views
'half the light of the world to save the world" *NM* - 14/06/2010 04:05:43 AM 1151 Views
Rand himself muses in TGS about his lost hand - 14/06/2010 01:09:11 PM 667 Views
Re: Rand himself muses in TGS about his lost hand - 14/06/2010 07:40:04 PM 664 Views
According to Crossroads of Twilight... - 14/06/2010 11:40:07 PM 508 Views
Not really an answer to your post... - 14/06/2010 11:48:06 PM 569 Views
But I completely agree. - 15/06/2010 01:40:45 AM 589 Views

Reply to Message