Active Users:1192 Time:23/11/2024 03:54:08 AM
Re: It's a huge honor to be a sul'dam, and they test for that on the same day Mats imaginary friend Send a noteboard - 02/06/2010 05:53:14 AM
I wonder if it possible for a sparker to first test positive for a sul'dam and then afterwards for the collar itself. I guess it must be given that the testing is done. That would still mean fear and doubt even after you became a sul'dam. More so perhaps since at that point you would actually have seen firsthand what would happen to you. Heck, if you tested positive for channeling as a sul'dam, one would think the chance that you might also have the spark would be significant so a lot of sul'dam eventually end up as damane afterall.


That is an interesting thought. I don't know if it has even been stated if someone with the spark can be tought to use the power before it starts to manifest naturally. I would think this would have been mentioned beforehand if it was possible, as it probably would have led the Seanchan to realize that Sul'dam can channel. It is clearly stated (not including the possibility that the some of the Seanchan high elite might know) that this was a very new and startling revelation to those who learned this. I really don't think this is going to happen, or we probably would have seen evidence of it before now.

Hmm. Do we know the statistics involved? I mean there seem to be a lot of damane around. Makes me wonder actually how they could possibly compete with the channeling capacity of the AS and the Asha'man who both also accept/train learners. Should they not already be outnumbered? How many people are in Seanchan total? I am not entirely sure what the percentages or channelers to population are, nor how many people the foodproduction in a medieval society like Seanchan could support. Help?


As for the Seanchan being outnumbered just because they don't accept learners I think there are a few factors to offset this disadvantage. First, Seanchan is as large as, if not larger than Randland, the Aiel Waste, and Shara combined, and if the strength of the army that they brought to Randland (which was really just an over sized reconnaissance mission) is any indication, then they have the massive population to match the scale of their empire. To give you an idea of a potential population, at it's height I believe the Roman Empire had a population of around 50 million people and only had an army of 600,000 or so soldiers. IIRC the Seanchan have easily surpassed this number just considering the soldiers brought over to Randland (which can hardly be anywhere near their full army if they have any intention of retaining their current holdings in Seanchan.) Also, the fact that Seanchan (outside of occasional rebellions and new conquests on the fringes of their empire) would have been relatively stable for many centuries, should have allowed for their population to expand while in Randland it has been in near constant decline, as is shown in the numerous countries that have dissapeared due to depopulation and continuous war.

I can only speculate about the food production levels of the Seanchan Empire, but given what seems to be a much higher level of organization and the greater stability that they enjoy, I would think that they could easily have been near the thresh-hold that any society would reach prior to
the industrial revolution. The Ming Empire in the mid 17th century had an estimated population of 150 million and that was pre-industrial revolution, so Seanchan could potentially be comparable in size.

Also, the Seanchan's considerable organization would very likely allow for a much more comprehensive collection of channelers when compared to the Aes Sedai's and Ashaman's haphazard recruitment strategies. Even if Seanchan didn't have a massively larger population than Randland this would still probably go a long way towards equalizing out the gap created by not recruiting learners. Finding a few random farmers or innkeepers while stopping by a village is worlds away from systematically testing every single person in your realm for the ability to channel.

Anyway, you might be right about the "someone else" thing. Especially if actual sparkers are rare enough that someone being caught happens very rarely. Out of sight, out of mind and all that. It also just occurred to me to wonder if the average Seanchan citizen knows how involuntary becoming a channeler is. I mean one would expect this would be obvious since no one wants to be a channeler there, but the Seanchan are brainwashed in other ways too. Maybe they are conditioned from childhood to think that all those who are caught were evil people who chose to become channelers, rather than the innocent victims with bad luck that they are in truth. And naturally this would mean that a "good girl" would not need to fear becoming a damane since they would never "choose" to channel.


Can't comment too much on this. I could see it going either way, though the Seanchan's tendency towards superstition makes me think that they might think this way.
This message last edited by Mats imaginary friend on 02/06/2010 at 06:00:58 AM
Reply to message
Seanchan girls. Do they live in terror until 25? - 02/06/2010 12:32:14 AM 1408 Views
It's a huge honor to be a sul'dam, and they test for that on the same day - 02/06/2010 01:06:32 AM 798 Views
Re: It's a huge honor to be a sul'dam, and they test for that on the same day - 02/06/2010 01:50:49 AM 798 Views
Re: It's a huge honor to be a sul'dam, and they test for that on the same day - 02/06/2010 05:53:14 AM 784 Views
A few details to consider - 02/06/2010 01:11:12 AM 796 Views
Re: A few details to consider - 02/06/2010 02:31:08 AM 805 Views
Wasn't talking about breeding damane - 03/06/2010 03:32:44 AM 801 Views
Re: Wasn't talking about breeding damane - 04/06/2010 07:30:55 PM 662 Views
Well, it took centuries for most people to understand breeding/genetics - 02/06/2010 08:57:43 PM 626 Views
Nobody knows about Sul'dam because it takes them extra long to learn. - 03/06/2010 07:58:41 AM 926 Views
Re: A few details to consider - 04/06/2010 07:33:39 AM 657 Views
I think it's seen as something that happens to other people. - 02/06/2010 02:20:09 AM 666 Views
I think they retest only the sul'dam - 02/06/2010 04:13:55 AM 836 Views
Re: I think they retest only the sul'dam - 04/06/2010 07:55:56 PM 632 Views
Point on the testing - 08/06/2010 02:15:26 AM 603 Views
Re: Point on the testing - 08/06/2010 02:46:06 PM 672 Views
Remember, Seancean have no idea channeling can be "learned" - 02/06/2010 07:04:11 AM 727 Views
This is how Damane and Sul'Dam are determined, straight from tGH - 03/06/2010 08:14:03 AM 1029 Views
That doesn't make sense. Are you sure they don't put the BRACELET on the girls, not the collar? - 04/06/2010 01:35:08 AM 622 Views
I am absolutely sure. Quote from book. - 04/06/2010 03:09:08 AM 689 Views
Re: I am absolutely sure. Quote from book. - 04/06/2010 11:54:25 AM 569 Views
Thanks Darius *NM* - 08/06/2010 01:48:28 AM 345 Views
Toun, though too young can be collared - 06/06/2010 03:29:29 AM 556 Views
I don't think Tuon will ever Channel - 06/06/2010 03:39:16 AM 662 Views
Everything points to a change in policy - 06/06/2010 04:04:33 AM 574 Views
Re: Everything points to a change in policy - 06/06/2010 04:18:21 AM 467 Views
Re: I don't think Tuon will ever Channel - 06/06/2010 05:07:40 AM 579 Views
Not at all - 02/06/2010 03:52:31 PM 551 Views
Re: Are the new damane actually tortured? - 02/06/2010 06:56:10 PM 697 Views
I think "tortured" is relative... - 03/06/2010 08:22:37 AM 640 Views
As with most things in Jordan's universe, I don't think it was thought through very seriously. - 03/06/2010 08:05:04 PM 579 Views
Huh? - 03/06/2010 08:44:35 PM 673 Views
Sure - 03/06/2010 09:00:40 PM 676 Views
Bah... - 03/06/2010 09:51:09 PM 640 Views
Jordan definitely made mistakes with the Ajahs. In particular, the Black Ajah ones who fled. - 03/06/2010 10:56:39 PM 630 Views
oh come now - 04/06/2010 12:58:44 AM 555 Views
Re: Sure - 04/06/2010 04:55:23 AM 716 Views
I don't know if that's totally true - 04/06/2010 12:09:29 PM 557 Views
Maybe you don't read that much serious literature? I just don't see why you are arguing this. - 04/06/2010 03:47:50 PM 583 Views
I actually don't read much fiction at all to be honest - 04/06/2010 04:00:03 PM 607 Views
You're right about the fact that I have mostly contempt for Jordan. - 04/06/2010 05:42:49 PM 585 Views
meh. I prefer non-fiction most of the time - 06/06/2010 03:44:38 AM 623 Views
I have read lots of fiction - 06/06/2010 03:57:07 AM 614 Views
Meh - 04/06/2010 05:03:41 PM 599 Views
LOL ... I hear ya on that - 06/06/2010 03:49:48 AM 618 Views
We've seen so little of the old tongue how can you tell? - 06/06/2010 03:33:46 AM 480 Views
This raises another question - 06/06/2010 04:13:25 AM 539 Views
Re: This raises another question - 06/06/2010 04:53:42 AM 597 Views

Reply to Message