be careful ... your stretching far enough you might hurt yourself
darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 29/05/2010 01:12:29 PM
"Intuitively obvious" like his old math teacher did, namely that it is obvious, if you know which clues are important and have to be combined. Thus, it's certainly meant in a funny, faked presumptuous way to imitate the way a teacher would speak to his pupils, who try to figure some problem out. But it's not a randmon joke meaning that the killer isn't obvious at all, or that there isn't a line of reasoning, which makes the suspect more obvious that all the other suspects.
As said, the reasoning for Graendal isn't really more obvious than the reasoning for Sammael or other Forsaken before LoC. Therefore - and for all the other reasons I often pointed out - it's very unlikely that Graendal is the solution.
On the other hand, especially for the author (the "math teacher" in the analogy), who of course exactly knows what Slayer is, can do and did before, and who is aware that there are important clues to figure this out in the first 5 books (plus additional indirect clues in the next books), it's obvious that the Shadow's assassin killed yet another betrayer.
And regarding the opportunity-factor, compare it to Fain's attack on Rand in the end of ACoS. Fain always wanted to kill Rand, but in this scene he suddenly saw a good opportunity to finish Rand, and almost succeeded. One can compare this to Asmo's end, IMO.
Personally, if it turns out to be Slayer, I think one can't disagree with RJ that it was in a way obvious, following my line of reasoning. But we will RAFO!
As said, the reasoning for Graendal isn't really more obvious than the reasoning for Sammael or other Forsaken before LoC. Therefore - and for all the other reasons I often pointed out - it's very unlikely that Graendal is the solution.
On the other hand, especially for the author (the "math teacher" in the analogy), who of course exactly knows what Slayer is, can do and did before, and who is aware that there are important clues to figure this out in the first 5 books (plus additional indirect clues in the next books), it's obvious that the Shadow's assassin killed yet another betrayer.
And regarding the opportunity-factor, compare it to Fain's attack on Rand in the end of ACoS. Fain always wanted to kill Rand, but in this scene he suddenly saw a good opportunity to finish Rand, and almost succeeded. One can compare this to Asmo's end, IMO.
Personally, if it turns out to be Slayer, I think one can't disagree with RJ that it was in a way obvious, following my line of reasoning. But we will RAFO!
He made the comment in a tongue-in-cheek manner (as others have pointed out)
From a 1998 Book signing
Who killed Asmodean?
o It should be "intuitively obvious".
o There ARE clues in later books. They may not be necessary, but they are there. I am not sure if he said "later" or "latest", though.
o He does indeed mean "intuitively obvious" in the sense that his math teachers would use when describing a proof, as speculated on rasfwr-j. "I always hated that."
This is a very telling quote to me.
1. RJ is getting a laugh out of this debate because he thought he'd made something obvious, when in fact he clearly did not.
2. The clues to the killer, where he thought he'd made it clear who the kill was, are mostly in TFoH, but he's woven a few new ones into LoC, ACoS and possibly PoD (that's the book he was touring for when this comment was made).
Given that Slayer is completely absent from any of these books I don't see how RJ could even begin to think the reader would be able to piece together Slayer as the killer from the text in TFoH or the subsequent books, when his only appearances on screen are anonymous!
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
An analysis of Asmodean's last seconds
27/05/2010 12:12:50 PM
- 2510 Views
I hate to say it, as I love this mystery....
27/05/2010 03:01:08 PM
- 1249 Views
I have a theory on the killer that doesn't involve Slayer...
28/05/2010 03:41:23 AM
- 1059 Views
In addition to Etzel's comments
28/05/2010 09:08:45 PM
- 902 Views
I'm pretty sure the Myrdraal that killed Caradin's family was a Proto-version of SH *NM*
28/05/2010 09:56:58 PM
- 623 Views
Smacking & ordering Carridin, yes - but no evidence it killed his kin *NM*
29/05/2010 04:40:15 PM
- 577 Views
Re: Smacking & ordering Carridin, yes - but no evidence it killed his kin
29/05/2010 09:16:01 PM
- 1047 Views
Far-fetched, IMO
27/05/2010 04:01:05 PM
- 1360 Views
I don't want Slayer to be the killer
27/05/2010 04:33:06 PM
- 1041 Views
The way you twist things, it certainly seems so!
27/05/2010 05:07:22 PM
- 1129 Views
Bah, hogwash!
27/05/2010 05:17:37 PM
- 1005 Views
Re: Bah, hogwash!
27/05/2010 08:14:16 PM
- 1073 Views
The point is...
28/05/2010 08:38:49 AM
- 1070 Views
Yes, but Fain is a far cry from your average non-channeler
28/05/2010 12:01:44 PM
- 1122 Views
As is Slayer
28/05/2010 12:25:07 PM
- 995 Views
There is no evidence of this at all
28/05/2010 12:32:37 PM
- 976 Views
Yeah, the evil guys don't manage to harm the good guys
28/05/2010 12:38:57 PM
- 940 Views
You always twist the quotes to make them say what Jordan didn't intend to say....
28/05/2010 02:20:09 PM
- 1029 Views
None of this explains how Slayer had opportunity that others didn't
27/05/2010 05:12:48 PM
- 1165 Views
We often see...
27/05/2010 05:33:19 PM
- 1035 Views
I just keep coming back to Slayer needs wild explanations while Graendal is more obvious
27/05/2010 05:52:13 PM
- 1123 Views
Indeed
28/05/2010 08:39:14 AM
- 972 Views
Well...
28/05/2010 10:19:46 AM
- 1023 Views
Re: Well...
28/05/2010 12:20:15 PM
- 1028 Views
I adressed the points regarding the Fain-comparsion above
28/05/2010 12:35:08 PM
- 973 Views
your Slayer theory is ridiculously complex!
28/05/2010 12:37:08 PM
- 1012 Views
It just requires to combine some clues from the first 5 books & some common sense
28/05/2010 12:44:10 PM
- 964 Views
Re: Well...
28/05/2010 02:27:40 PM
- 1140 Views
No...
28/05/2010 03:04:41 PM
- 1060 Views
let's try this another way
28/05/2010 03:14:07 PM
- 1051 Views
The main problem with Graendal is...
28/05/2010 05:31:09 PM
- 977 Views
Re: The main problem with Graendal is...
28/05/2010 09:20:27 PM
- 1114 Views
my first thought was it was Sammael or Graendal. Come LoC it was clear to me that it was Graendal.
28/05/2010 09:44:38 PM
- 1146 Views
RJ used the expression...
29/05/2010 08:17:08 AM
- 955 Views
be careful ... your stretching far enough you might hurt yourself
29/05/2010 01:12:29 PM
- 1064 Views
Re: I don't want Slayer to be the killer
27/05/2010 07:47:40 PM
- 994 Views
Couple of questions
27/05/2010 09:53:05 PM
- 1020 Views
Be'lal managed to get out NO!
27/05/2010 10:08:33 PM
- 885 Views
Hmmm
27/05/2010 10:27:55 PM
- 1004 Views
I don't think you can actually cut BF weaves
27/05/2010 10:45:34 PM
- 906 Views
Hmmm I wonder about that.
27/05/2010 10:58:46 PM
- 986 Views
I think it would be impossible for someone to react that quickly
27/05/2010 11:13:01 PM
- 1067 Views
Of course you do. Trying to deny it is just silly. Everyone knows your bias. *NM*
27/05/2010 08:43:18 PM
- 530 Views
No, seriously, if actually Graendal did it, it's ok to me, too
27/05/2010 09:08:48 PM
- 1025 Views
Re: No, seriously, if actually Graendal did it, it's ok to me, too
28/05/2010 08:25:46 AM
- 998 Views
But look...
28/05/2010 09:01:12 AM
- 1033 Views
if there are clues in TFoH I find it hard to believe that Slayer is involved
28/05/2010 12:29:40 PM
- 941 Views
The scene of Asmo's murder contains clues, of course
28/05/2010 12:32:13 PM
- 988 Views
Re: The scene of Asmo's murder contains clues, of course
28/05/2010 12:35:22 PM
- 1003 Views
RJ said the main clues are in the books before LoC. *NM*
28/05/2010 12:40:23 PM
- 1060 Views
Re: RJ said the main clues are in the books before LoC. *NM*
28/05/2010 12:52:30 PM
- 917 Views
Yeah, I know. *NM*
28/05/2010 02:51:32 PM
- 982 Views
Yet Slayer is no where to be seen between his vanishing after TSR and the start of WH
28/05/2010 03:09:44 PM
- 1003 Views
???
28/05/2010 02:19:17 PM
- 970 Views
Of course RJ implied that. You should read his quotes about Asmo! *NM*
28/05/2010 02:52:32 PM
- 986 Views
Here is what RJ said EDIT
28/05/2010 03:29:19 PM
- 774 Views
Indeed
28/05/2010 05:18:35 PM
- 935 Views
Re: Indeed
28/05/2010 05:26:38 PM
- 887 Views
But he was already introduced to us before the murder, and that is all that matters. *NM*
28/05/2010 05:33:02 PM
- 943 Views
Re: But he was already introduced to us before the murder, and that is all that matters. *NM*
28/05/2010 07:05:27 PM
- 899 Views
Re: Far-fetched, IMO
02/06/2010 07:34:58 PM
- 1105 Views
Sent by whom? And how on earth would he be expected to interrupt a Forsaken plot? *NM*
02/06/2010 11:13:04 PM
- 649 Views
Re: Sent by whom? And how on earth would he be expected to interrupt a Forsaken plot?
19/06/2010 12:59:54 AM
- 807 Views
Slayer takes orders from the Forsaken
19/06/2010 03:30:37 AM
- 1016 Views
Re: Slayer takes orders from the Forsaken
24/06/2010 09:03:18 AM
- 1212 Views
The orders to not kill Rand didn't happen until the next book
26/06/2010 02:32:26 PM
- 715 Views
Re: The orders to not kill Rand didn't happen until the next book
01/07/2010 10:13:53 PM
- 1157 Views
Lanfear killed Asmo.....
28/05/2010 05:05:55 AM
- 914 Views
Doesn't make sense
28/05/2010 11:09:14 AM
- 947 Views
Sorry, Lanfear did it.....
29/05/2010 03:47:44 AM
- 888 Views
Considering that RJ didn't even necessarily want to reveal it, it was pretty random, yeah. *NM*
29/05/2010 08:25:54 AM
- 594 Views
Death is Moridin "when death took him"; need I say more *NM*
28/05/2010 10:07:14 AM
- 646 Views
There is a quote that refutes this...
28/05/2010 10:22:12 AM
- 1000 Views
He could have recognized Moridan.....due to the True Power in his eyes.
29/05/2010 03:49:49 AM
- 938 Views
No other Forsaken immediately recognizes Moridin as Ishy because of the saa. *NM*
29/05/2010 08:26:44 AM
- 599 Views
RJ failed, Etzel's analysis is sharp, and I'm gonna abandon the Asmo question forever
28/05/2010 08:55:01 PM
- 1019 Views
Re: RJ failed, Etzel's analysis is sharp, and I'm gonna abandon the Asmo question forever *NM*
28/05/2010 09:24:41 PM
- 692 Views
I think I found an RJ quote that kills the Slayer theory
29/05/2010 01:57:20 PM
- 910 Views
If Slayer is actually the killer...
29/05/2010 02:20:32 PM
- 974 Views
Please, RJ would do as he always had and immediately RAFOd a question like that
29/05/2010 02:26:10 PM
- 933 Views
Well, I don't think so.
29/05/2010 02:43:28 PM
- 948 Views
RJ pretty much said it wasn't Slayer.
06/06/2010 05:44:05 AM
- 836 Views
If Slayer never met Asmo in the books he could not have killed him
06/06/2010 12:46:40 PM
- 838 Views
But Slayer could have met Asmo, when he was killed.. *NM*
06/06/2010 01:06:01 PM
- 880 Views
Directly contradicts what RJ said "they did not meet in the books"
06/06/2010 02:51:50 PM
- 849 Views
Not "before" the murder. *NM*
06/06/2010 06:03:34 PM
- 921 Views
Re: Not "before" the murder. *NM*
06/06/2010 10:25:16 PM
- 834 Views
He answers the question, if they met "before" the murder. *NM*
07/06/2010 07:18:50 AM
- 642 Views
not if it didn't happen in the books
07/06/2010 12:08:34 PM
- 772 Views
I think Asmo's killer was as surprised as he.
29/05/2010 09:26:03 PM
- 957 Views
That's what I've always thought as well.
29/05/2010 10:06:56 PM
- 871 Views
You know, there's no direct proof suggesting that Asmo's killer was "surprised".....
01/06/2010 04:04:56 AM
- 886 Views
except the Author said it was a murder of opportunity
01/06/2010 11:13:14 PM
- 913 Views
That is simply false.
02/06/2010 10:00:27 AM
- 952 Views
RJ stated it was a murder of opportunity ... I never said "only"
02/06/2010 11:49:23 AM
- 1020 Views
Of course, it is false
02/06/2010 12:13:11 PM
- 940 Views
Here are the quotes
02/06/2010 12:39:29 PM
- 877 Views
As said, those quotes simply don't support that the murder was basically just an unplanned accident. *NM*
02/06/2010 02:14:29 PM
- 646 Views
I disagree. It's pretty much black and white that the opportunity/timing is the key factor to
02/06/2010 02:39:03 PM
- 800 Views
Actually I like it because it fits Slayer better than Graendal, as pointed out. *NM*
02/06/2010 02:51:24 PM
- 486 Views
that makes no sense at all *NM*
02/06/2010 02:53:28 PM
- 697 Views
RJ pretty much said it wasn't Slayer.
06/06/2010 05:47:13 AM
- 974 Views
Well...
06/06/2010 10:46:13 AM
- 964 Views
Logic
06/06/2010 02:53:27 PM
- 913 Views
You're falling into Etzelian logic there...
06/06/2010 03:25:30 PM
- 917 Views
I'm just being a smartass *NM*
06/06/2010 03:36:00 PM
- 660 Views
That's not anyone's logic, this argument is simply utter nonsense. *NM*
07/06/2010 12:08:05 PM
- 952 Views
just like thinking Slayer was the killer is
07/06/2010 12:09:34 PM
- 896 Views
Yeah...
07/06/2010 12:21:31 PM
- 965 Views
thinking the top assassin killed someone when it's been stated over and over
07/06/2010 12:56:48 PM
- 952 Views
Those quotes pretty much show that Graendal is careful... *NM*
07/06/2010 01:03:26 PM
- 880 Views
No they show that she is deliberate!
07/06/2010 01:12:29 PM
- 980 Views
That are just semantics
07/06/2010 01:36:12 PM
- 1047 Views
and you think it's obvious that Slayer was the premier Shadow assassin prior to WH?
07/06/2010 02:06:47 PM
- 933 Views
As I explained you several times, I can see why RJ thought it is obvious, yes...
07/06/2010 02:17:01 PM
- 903 Views
Why wouldn't Graendal head to Caemlyn at that point?
07/06/2010 02:36:24 PM
- 987 Views
And where was she then, when Rand attacked Rahvin?
07/06/2010 02:54:33 PM
- 1023 Views
Re: And where was she then, when Rand attacked Rahvin?
07/06/2010 03:01:14 PM
- 988 Views
You should re-read the scene where Moghedien tells Nynaeve about it...
07/06/2010 03:12:55 PM
- 956 Views
That's a different thing than Moghedien saying the plan was canceled
07/06/2010 03:15:32 PM
- 1051 Views
That is essentially what Moghedien said.
07/06/2010 03:33:35 PM
- 824 Views
um no it's not
07/06/2010 04:17:04 PM
- 904 Views
It's told after that...
07/06/2010 04:46:31 PM
- 873 Views
No it doesn't. It tells us that Rahvin, just like all the others had a side plan in place
07/06/2010 04:55:43 PM
- 1055 Views
Yeah...
07/06/2010 05:17:59 PM
- 953 Views
Funny I feel the same way you do ...
07/06/2010 05:25:48 PM
- 943 Views
Ah, whatever...
07/06/2010 05:35:22 PM
- 844 Views
We are on the exact same page
07/06/2010 05:42:48 PM
- 924 Views