The way you twist things, it certainly seems so!
fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 27/05/2010 05:07:22 PM
But I certainly think he fits the clues from the books and what RJ said best.
The question here is not who, but how. Be it Slayer or Graendal or Lanfear, the killer did not follow Asmodean, nor did the killer plan this location for Asmo's death. That is abundantly clear.
It was reported that RJ said Asmo is "roadkill". In slang that simply means - and I cite the free dictionary, but there are similar definitions elsewhere, too - : "One that has failed or been defeated and is no longer worthy of consideration." It's certainly not meant in its literal meaning, namely that Asmo is "an animal killed by being struck by a motor vehicle", since that wouldn't make much sense. Meriam Webster even defines roadkill as "one that falls victim to intense competition <political roadkill>", which would support the idea of a fellow Forsaken sending a killer to assassinate the rival Asmo.
"Roadkill" most likely means here that Asmo wasn't needed anymore in the story and thus the author let him die in some way, but not that the murder wasn't planned at all by the killer, and that it was basically a complete accident.
"Roadkill" most likely means here that Asmo wasn't needed anymore in the story and thus the author let him die in some way, but not that the murder wasn't planned at all by the killer, and that it was basically a complete accident.
OMG! The lengths you go to...
Roadkill, in general usage, means a death that wasn't intended but was the direct result of someone's actions. Say there's a shootout, and someone walking by gets caught in the crossfire, it is legitimate to call them roadkill. That's what RJ meant, that Asmo was never the intended target of the killer (the killer may not have had a target at all). He died because he crossed her/him at the wrong place at the wrong time.
RJ also said that "timing is what you should focus on" and it's reported "he emphasized OPPORTUNITY as the key to knowing Asmodean's killer, even over motive (which got a mention)". This makes clear that someone saw an opportunity to kill Asmo, and managed it to get to the right place in time. This is further supported by RJ's statement that "Padan Fain didn't [kill Asmo] because he wasn't in the right place at the right time. He would have if he had been in the right place at the right time, but he wasn't."
That is total nonsense. If opportunity trumps motive, then that means that said person could not have been hanging around waiting to kill Asmo (even if they might have had a motive to kill him). The moment you make it that the killer was following Asmo around waiting to kill him, then you have to make it that motive trumps opportunity, which is directly against what RJ said.
This makes clear that the killer managed to use the opportunity to kill Asmo in time, likely because the killer figured where Asmo would go 8and if Asmo hadn't opened the small door, the killer had simply waited for another good opportunity).
No. It means that the killer was in the pantry, and when he saw Asmo defenseless and unprepared, she/he took the opportunity to strike. If Asmo hadn't opened the door, nothing would have happened.
Plus, that even Fain would have succeeded to kill Asmo, shows that certainly Slayer could manage it as well.
And you say you're not obsessed with wanting the killer to be Slayer?
An analysis of Asmodean's last seconds
27/05/2010 12:12:50 PM
- 2512 Views
I hate to say it, as I love this mystery....
27/05/2010 03:01:08 PM
- 1249 Views
I have a theory on the killer that doesn't involve Slayer...
28/05/2010 03:41:23 AM
- 1060 Views
In addition to Etzel's comments
28/05/2010 09:08:45 PM
- 903 Views
I'm pretty sure the Myrdraal that killed Caradin's family was a Proto-version of SH *NM*
28/05/2010 09:56:58 PM
- 623 Views
Smacking & ordering Carridin, yes - but no evidence it killed his kin *NM*
29/05/2010 04:40:15 PM
- 577 Views
Re: Smacking & ordering Carridin, yes - but no evidence it killed his kin
29/05/2010 09:16:01 PM
- 1047 Views
Far-fetched, IMO
27/05/2010 04:01:05 PM
- 1361 Views
I don't want Slayer to be the killer
27/05/2010 04:33:06 PM
- 1042 Views
The way you twist things, it certainly seems so!
27/05/2010 05:07:22 PM
- 1131 Views
Bah, hogwash!
27/05/2010 05:17:37 PM
- 1007 Views
Re: Bah, hogwash!
27/05/2010 08:14:16 PM
- 1075 Views
The point is...
28/05/2010 08:38:49 AM
- 1071 Views
Yes, but Fain is a far cry from your average non-channeler
28/05/2010 12:01:44 PM
- 1122 Views
As is Slayer
28/05/2010 12:25:07 PM
- 997 Views
There is no evidence of this at all
28/05/2010 12:32:37 PM
- 978 Views
Yeah, the evil guys don't manage to harm the good guys
28/05/2010 12:38:57 PM
- 941 Views
You always twist the quotes to make them say what Jordan didn't intend to say....
28/05/2010 02:20:09 PM
- 1029 Views
None of this explains how Slayer had opportunity that others didn't
27/05/2010 05:12:48 PM
- 1167 Views
We often see...
27/05/2010 05:33:19 PM
- 1037 Views
I just keep coming back to Slayer needs wild explanations while Graendal is more obvious
27/05/2010 05:52:13 PM
- 1125 Views
Indeed
28/05/2010 08:39:14 AM
- 973 Views
Well...
28/05/2010 10:19:46 AM
- 1024 Views
Re: Well...
28/05/2010 12:20:15 PM
- 1030 Views
I adressed the points regarding the Fain-comparsion above
28/05/2010 12:35:08 PM
- 975 Views
your Slayer theory is ridiculously complex!
28/05/2010 12:37:08 PM
- 1014 Views
It just requires to combine some clues from the first 5 books & some common sense
28/05/2010 12:44:10 PM
- 964 Views
Re: Well...
28/05/2010 02:27:40 PM
- 1141 Views
No...
28/05/2010 03:04:41 PM
- 1062 Views
let's try this another way
28/05/2010 03:14:07 PM
- 1053 Views
The main problem with Graendal is...
28/05/2010 05:31:09 PM
- 979 Views
Re: The main problem with Graendal is...
28/05/2010 09:20:27 PM
- 1116 Views
my first thought was it was Sammael or Graendal. Come LoC it was clear to me that it was Graendal.
28/05/2010 09:44:38 PM
- 1146 Views
RJ used the expression...
29/05/2010 08:17:08 AM
- 955 Views
be careful ... your stretching far enough you might hurt yourself
29/05/2010 01:12:29 PM
- 1065 Views
Re: I don't want Slayer to be the killer
27/05/2010 07:47:40 PM
- 995 Views
Couple of questions
27/05/2010 09:53:05 PM
- 1020 Views
Be'lal managed to get out NO!
27/05/2010 10:08:33 PM
- 886 Views
Hmmm
27/05/2010 10:27:55 PM
- 1004 Views
I don't think you can actually cut BF weaves
27/05/2010 10:45:34 PM
- 908 Views
Hmmm I wonder about that.
27/05/2010 10:58:46 PM
- 988 Views
I think it would be impossible for someone to react that quickly
27/05/2010 11:13:01 PM
- 1069 Views
Of course you do. Trying to deny it is just silly. Everyone knows your bias. *NM*
27/05/2010 08:43:18 PM
- 530 Views
No, seriously, if actually Graendal did it, it's ok to me, too
27/05/2010 09:08:48 PM
- 1026 Views
Re: No, seriously, if actually Graendal did it, it's ok to me, too
28/05/2010 08:25:46 AM
- 1000 Views
But look...
28/05/2010 09:01:12 AM
- 1035 Views
if there are clues in TFoH I find it hard to believe that Slayer is involved
28/05/2010 12:29:40 PM
- 941 Views
The scene of Asmo's murder contains clues, of course
28/05/2010 12:32:13 PM
- 989 Views
Re: The scene of Asmo's murder contains clues, of course
28/05/2010 12:35:22 PM
- 1004 Views
RJ said the main clues are in the books before LoC. *NM*
28/05/2010 12:40:23 PM
- 1061 Views
Re: RJ said the main clues are in the books before LoC. *NM*
28/05/2010 12:52:30 PM
- 918 Views
Yeah, I know. *NM*
28/05/2010 02:51:32 PM
- 984 Views
Yet Slayer is no where to be seen between his vanishing after TSR and the start of WH
28/05/2010 03:09:44 PM
- 1003 Views
???
28/05/2010 02:19:17 PM
- 972 Views
Of course RJ implied that. You should read his quotes about Asmo! *NM*
28/05/2010 02:52:32 PM
- 988 Views
Here is what RJ said EDIT
28/05/2010 03:29:19 PM
- 775 Views
Indeed
28/05/2010 05:18:35 PM
- 937 Views
Re: Indeed
28/05/2010 05:26:38 PM
- 888 Views
But he was already introduced to us before the murder, and that is all that matters. *NM*
28/05/2010 05:33:02 PM
- 943 Views
Re: But he was already introduced to us before the murder, and that is all that matters. *NM*
28/05/2010 07:05:27 PM
- 900 Views
Re: Far-fetched, IMO
02/06/2010 07:34:58 PM
- 1107 Views
Sent by whom? And how on earth would he be expected to interrupt a Forsaken plot? *NM*
02/06/2010 11:13:04 PM
- 649 Views
Re: Sent by whom? And how on earth would he be expected to interrupt a Forsaken plot?
19/06/2010 12:59:54 AM
- 809 Views
Slayer takes orders from the Forsaken
19/06/2010 03:30:37 AM
- 1018 Views
Re: Slayer takes orders from the Forsaken
24/06/2010 09:03:18 AM
- 1214 Views
The orders to not kill Rand didn't happen until the next book
26/06/2010 02:32:26 PM
- 716 Views
Re: The orders to not kill Rand didn't happen until the next book
01/07/2010 10:13:53 PM
- 1158 Views
Lanfear killed Asmo.....
28/05/2010 05:05:55 AM
- 916 Views
Doesn't make sense
28/05/2010 11:09:14 AM
- 949 Views
Sorry, Lanfear did it.....
29/05/2010 03:47:44 AM
- 889 Views
Considering that RJ didn't even necessarily want to reveal it, it was pretty random, yeah. *NM*
29/05/2010 08:25:54 AM
- 594 Views
Death is Moridin "when death took him"; need I say more *NM*
28/05/2010 10:07:14 AM
- 646 Views
There is a quote that refutes this...
28/05/2010 10:22:12 AM
- 1001 Views
He could have recognized Moridan.....due to the True Power in his eyes.
29/05/2010 03:49:49 AM
- 939 Views
No other Forsaken immediately recognizes Moridin as Ishy because of the saa. *NM*
29/05/2010 08:26:44 AM
- 599 Views
RJ failed, Etzel's analysis is sharp, and I'm gonna abandon the Asmo question forever
28/05/2010 08:55:01 PM
- 1021 Views
Re: RJ failed, Etzel's analysis is sharp, and I'm gonna abandon the Asmo question forever *NM*
28/05/2010 09:24:41 PM
- 692 Views
I think I found an RJ quote that kills the Slayer theory
29/05/2010 01:57:20 PM
- 911 Views
If Slayer is actually the killer...
29/05/2010 02:20:32 PM
- 975 Views
Please, RJ would do as he always had and immediately RAFOd a question like that
29/05/2010 02:26:10 PM
- 935 Views
Well, I don't think so.
29/05/2010 02:43:28 PM
- 950 Views
RJ pretty much said it wasn't Slayer.
06/06/2010 05:44:05 AM
- 837 Views
If Slayer never met Asmo in the books he could not have killed him
06/06/2010 12:46:40 PM
- 840 Views
But Slayer could have met Asmo, when he was killed.. *NM*
06/06/2010 01:06:01 PM
- 882 Views
Directly contradicts what RJ said "they did not meet in the books"
06/06/2010 02:51:50 PM
- 850 Views
Not "before" the murder. *NM*
06/06/2010 06:03:34 PM
- 923 Views
Re: Not "before" the murder. *NM*
06/06/2010 10:25:16 PM
- 835 Views
He answers the question, if they met "before" the murder. *NM*
07/06/2010 07:18:50 AM
- 642 Views
not if it didn't happen in the books
07/06/2010 12:08:34 PM
- 773 Views
I think Asmo's killer was as surprised as he.
29/05/2010 09:26:03 PM
- 958 Views
That's what I've always thought as well.
29/05/2010 10:06:56 PM
- 873 Views
You know, there's no direct proof suggesting that Asmo's killer was "surprised".....
01/06/2010 04:04:56 AM
- 887 Views
except the Author said it was a murder of opportunity
01/06/2010 11:13:14 PM
- 914 Views
That is simply false.
02/06/2010 10:00:27 AM
- 953 Views
RJ stated it was a murder of opportunity ... I never said "only"
02/06/2010 11:49:23 AM
- 1020 Views
Of course, it is false
02/06/2010 12:13:11 PM
- 941 Views
Here are the quotes
02/06/2010 12:39:29 PM
- 878 Views
As said, those quotes simply don't support that the murder was basically just an unplanned accident. *NM*
02/06/2010 02:14:29 PM
- 646 Views
I disagree. It's pretty much black and white that the opportunity/timing is the key factor to
02/06/2010 02:39:03 PM
- 800 Views
Actually I like it because it fits Slayer better than Graendal, as pointed out. *NM*
02/06/2010 02:51:24 PM
- 486 Views
that makes no sense at all *NM*
02/06/2010 02:53:28 PM
- 697 Views
RJ pretty much said it wasn't Slayer.
06/06/2010 05:47:13 AM
- 974 Views
Well...
06/06/2010 10:46:13 AM
- 966 Views
Logic
06/06/2010 02:53:27 PM
- 914 Views
You're falling into Etzelian logic there...
06/06/2010 03:25:30 PM
- 919 Views
I'm just being a smartass *NM*
06/06/2010 03:36:00 PM
- 660 Views
That's not anyone's logic, this argument is simply utter nonsense. *NM*
07/06/2010 12:08:05 PM
- 954 Views
just like thinking Slayer was the killer is
07/06/2010 12:09:34 PM
- 896 Views
Yeah...
07/06/2010 12:21:31 PM
- 966 Views
thinking the top assassin killed someone when it's been stated over and over
07/06/2010 12:56:48 PM
- 953 Views
Those quotes pretty much show that Graendal is careful... *NM*
07/06/2010 01:03:26 PM
- 881 Views
No they show that she is deliberate!
07/06/2010 01:12:29 PM
- 980 Views
That are just semantics
07/06/2010 01:36:12 PM
- 1047 Views
and you think it's obvious that Slayer was the premier Shadow assassin prior to WH?
07/06/2010 02:06:47 PM
- 935 Views
As I explained you several times, I can see why RJ thought it is obvious, yes...
07/06/2010 02:17:01 PM
- 904 Views
Why wouldn't Graendal head to Caemlyn at that point?
07/06/2010 02:36:24 PM
- 988 Views
And where was she then, when Rand attacked Rahvin?
07/06/2010 02:54:33 PM
- 1024 Views
Re: And where was she then, when Rand attacked Rahvin?
07/06/2010 03:01:14 PM
- 990 Views
You should re-read the scene where Moghedien tells Nynaeve about it...
07/06/2010 03:12:55 PM
- 957 Views
That's a different thing than Moghedien saying the plan was canceled
07/06/2010 03:15:32 PM
- 1052 Views
That is essentially what Moghedien said.
07/06/2010 03:33:35 PM
- 825 Views
um no it's not
07/06/2010 04:17:04 PM
- 905 Views
It's told after that...
07/06/2010 04:46:31 PM
- 874 Views
No it doesn't. It tells us that Rahvin, just like all the others had a side plan in place
07/06/2010 04:55:43 PM
- 1055 Views
Yeah...
07/06/2010 05:17:59 PM
- 955 Views
Funny I feel the same way you do ...
07/06/2010 05:25:48 PM
- 945 Views
Ah, whatever...
07/06/2010 05:35:22 PM
- 846 Views
We are on the exact same page
07/06/2010 05:42:48 PM
- 925 Views