Well, the TP is not related to who killed Asmo, in my view
Etzel Send a noteboard - 26/05/2010 09:34:42 PM
But we didn't know about the TP for a long time after Ishy's death. All the clues to who killed Asmo were there prior to LoC right?
But of course we had clues concerning the TP before LoC, even if it wasn't named yet.
I am determined to prove, before it's revealed, that Lanfear killed Asmodean.
- 26/05/2010 05:36:59 AM
1138 Views
It's unlikely
- 26/05/2010 09:17:06 AM
816 Views
Re: It's unlikely
- 26/05/2010 02:04:08 PM
776 Views
Well...
- 26/05/2010 03:09:38 PM
769 Views
A few points
- 26/05/2010 03:50:12 PM
554 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 04:07:15 PM
632 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 04:23:39 PM
630 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 05:26:27 PM
610 Views
Actually I believe...
- 26/05/2010 06:00:55 PM
677 Views
Re: Actually I believe...
- 26/05/2010 07:04:51 PM
670 Views
I think...
- 26/05/2010 07:35:16 PM
602 Views
Re: I think...
- 26/05/2010 07:47:19 PM
547 Views
IMO, the difference is that Ishy was strongly connected to the DO, when he died in TAR. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 07:55:47 PM
292 Views
Re: IMO, the difference is that Ishy was strongly connected to the DO, when he died in TAR.
- 26/05/2010 08:25:36 PM
568 Views
But Ishy channeled the TP; thus the DO was more aware of him in TAR. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 08:33:45 PM
264 Views
I don't see how that really makes a difference
- 26/05/2010 08:43:58 PM
583 Views
At least Asmo didn't channel the TP, when he died; this could be the difference to Ishy. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 08:46:44 PM
267 Views
Re: At least Asmo didn't channel the TP, when he died; this could be the difference to Ishy.
- 26/05/2010 09:23:10 PM
551 Views
Well, the TP is not related to who killed Asmo, in my view
- 26/05/2010 09:34:42 PM
605 Views
That doesn't make sense
- 26/05/2010 09:40:10 PM
574 Views
That has nothing to do with the identity of the killer.
- 26/05/2010 09:56:18 PM
525 Views
I still think you are making this more convluted than it needs to be
- 26/05/2010 10:21:26 PM
593 Views
You confuse two things...
- 27/05/2010 09:46:56 AM
505 Views
But your theory completely relies on this thought
- 27/05/2010 11:48:48 AM
516 Views
I argue...
- 27/05/2010 12:20:09 PM
694 Views
we don't know any of that until WH
- 27/05/2010 12:49:53 PM
665 Views
Your explanation how the "where" is significant matches what I've been saying for awhile, too. *NM*
- 29/05/2010 09:49:02 PM
298 Views
You disregard Jordan's explanations about the Finns... and some others...
- 26/05/2010 12:50:30 PM
714 Views
I'm 80% sure it's Graendal, with 20% left over for Moghedien
- 26/05/2010 02:00:09 PM
595 Views
Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 02:17:57 PM
567 Views
Re: Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 02:26:23 PM
588 Views
Re: Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 03:06:49 PM
599 Views
Yep. More impressive than the guy who was killed by a shepherd, right? =)
- 27/05/2010 03:44:07 PM
550 Views