Active Users:1163 Time:22/11/2024 12:33:16 PM
I know... Etzel Send a noteboard - 26/05/2010 07:54:03 PM
That the majority of readers would agree with you that it's plausible that Graendal was there. But IMO it isn't, especially because we hardly knew anything about Graendal before LoC, except that she is a very obscene Forsaken. For example, Sammael would have been a more obvious candidate before LoC.

Also RJ's comment that the two servants Rand sees when he hunts Rahvin are in no way connected to the murder makes it rather unlikely to me that nonetheless Graendal was there to Compel any servants, unseen to the readers and that this is the reason for the murder.

Besides, if Graendal searched someone to use Complusion on to gather infos, it only makes sense to strike with heavy Compulsion on Asmo, abduct & interrogate and then kill him. This would be a perfect opportunity to Graendal to learn more about Rand & his plans. Like she tried in PoD with Cyndane & Moghedien.

As said, if balefire was used, it only makes sense that Graendal would use very weak balefire, but we know that in this case the DO can transmigrate the balefired person (but concerning Asmo, the DO couldn't).

It wasn't a big mystery, but I still think that RJ had a precise idea of what happened to Asmo. That a killer, who uses TAR, takes him there to die and get rid off his body, isn't such a complex thought. And that RJ indicated that he will most likely reveal it in the PoV of the killer speaks against Graendal as well because she is most likely dead and won't have another PoV.

It also makes sense to consider that the same killer, who already assassinated people associated to the Shadow twice before in the series, namely in the Stone of Tear and in Tar Valon, struck again in Caemlyn.
Reply to message
I am determined to prove, before it's revealed, that Lanfear killed Asmodean. - 26/05/2010 05:36:59 AM 1138 Views
It's unlikely - 26/05/2010 09:17:06 AM 816 Views
Re: It's unlikely - 26/05/2010 02:04:08 PM 776 Views
Well... - 26/05/2010 03:09:38 PM 769 Views
A few points - 26/05/2010 03:50:12 PM 554 Views
Re: A few points - 26/05/2010 04:07:15 PM 632 Views
Re: A few points - 26/05/2010 04:23:39 PM 630 Views
Re: A few points - 26/05/2010 05:26:27 PM 610 Views
Actually I believe... - 26/05/2010 06:00:55 PM 677 Views
Re: Actually I believe... - 26/05/2010 07:04:51 PM 670 Views
I think... - 26/05/2010 07:35:16 PM 602 Views
Re: I think... - 26/05/2010 07:47:19 PM 547 Views
IMO, the difference is that Ishy was strongly connected to the DO, when he died in TAR. *NM* - 26/05/2010 07:55:47 PM 292 Views
Re: IMO, the difference is that Ishy was strongly connected to the DO, when he died in TAR. - 26/05/2010 08:25:36 PM 568 Views
But Ishy channeled the TP; thus the DO was more aware of him in TAR. *NM* - 26/05/2010 08:33:45 PM 264 Views
I don't see how that really makes a difference - 26/05/2010 08:43:58 PM 582 Views
At least Asmo didn't channel the TP, when he died; this could be the difference to Ishy. *NM* - 26/05/2010 08:46:44 PM 267 Views
Re: At least Asmo didn't channel the TP, when he died; this could be the difference to Ishy. - 26/05/2010 09:23:10 PM 551 Views
Well, the TP is not related to who killed Asmo, in my view - 26/05/2010 09:34:42 PM 604 Views
That doesn't make sense - 26/05/2010 09:40:10 PM 574 Views
That has nothing to do with the identity of the killer. - 26/05/2010 09:56:18 PM 525 Views
I still think you are making this more convluted than it needs to be - 26/05/2010 10:21:26 PM 593 Views
You confuse two things... - 27/05/2010 09:46:56 AM 505 Views
But your theory completely relies on this thought - 27/05/2010 11:48:48 AM 516 Views
I argue... - 27/05/2010 12:20:09 PM 694 Views
we don't know any of that until WH - 27/05/2010 12:49:53 PM 665 Views
I cite your statement a few posts above... - 27/05/2010 12:59:06 PM 567 Views
Re: I cite your statement a few posts above... - 27/05/2010 01:14:51 PM 585 Views
Thanks! - 26/05/2010 07:12:01 PM 553 Views
Re: A few points - 26/05/2010 05:55:27 PM 627 Views
I think you are grasping a little - 26/05/2010 07:11:36 PM 613 Views
Re: Well... - 26/05/2010 04:15:42 PM 646 Views
I know... - 26/05/2010 07:54:03 PM 616 Views
Re: I know... - 26/05/2010 11:58:13 PM 484 Views
Re: I know... - 27/05/2010 09:41:20 AM 660 Views
graendal - 26/05/2010 11:57:04 PM 538 Views
I'm 80% sure it's Graendal, with 20% left over for Moghedien - 26/05/2010 02:00:09 PM 595 Views
Moghedien would be quite the trick - 26/05/2010 02:17:57 PM 567 Views
Re: Moghedien would be quite the trick - 26/05/2010 02:26:23 PM 588 Views
Re: Moghedien would be quite the trick - 26/05/2010 03:06:49 PM 599 Views
Yep. More impressive than the guy who was killed by a shepherd, right? =) - 27/05/2010 03:44:07 PM 550 Views
Maybe she did it, but you misjudge Lanfear bigtime, I think - 26/05/2010 07:12:09 PM 610 Views
Aviendha(sp) done it *NM* - 26/05/2010 09:20:11 PM 301 Views
I agree - 30/05/2010 09:44:57 PM 757 Views

Reply to Message