Active Users:1104 Time:22/11/2024 09:12:37 PM
... Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 21/05/2010 08:23:08 PM
LMAO I love the way that Cannoli's lack of reply is taken of evidence of him understanding your post (especially how you lectured other posters on how the onus of evidence works).


I never said he understood my post, you claimed that three people did not understand my argument, and I simply demonstrated that Cannoli never showed anything to demonstrate that he didn't. You're the one to make the claim, so the onus of evidence is on you. Despite your dishonesty, I never claimed that Cannoli understood my post.

Fionwe called you incoherent and illogical, and the biggest fool in the world. His post is also aptly titled 'WTF?' This is powerful evidence in your favour that he understands your post and that you've reached an amicable agreement to agree to disagree. Lol.


Again, you are being dishonest. I never said anything about an amicable agreement. And I don't agree to disagree. Fionwe has perfectly justified reasons to be angry at me, given that I simply dropped the discussion without addressing any of his arguments, essentially snubbing him. I'd be angry too. However, he does understand my argument, given that he posted:

If by the above statement, you mean why no one brought this issue up to Egwene when she was a captive


As you can see, her comprehension of my position is perfectly fine, so again, you're the only one who has difficulty grasping the concept.

I explained in my other posts why I thought this. You bounce around between books 4 and 12 as if they're simultaneous events, and get angry when I suggest they're not. Just look at Fionwe's last post - he still doesn't know when exactly you're referring to Egwene. Neither do I. That makes you incoherent and illogical IMO.


You lie. I have never referred to this happening at any other time than during The Gathering Storm (or possibly Knife of Dreams). Observe:

Fanatic-Templar: Yeah, but you'd expect the Red Ajah to have said something about it in The Gathering Storm or something.

is it possible that you, like Cannoli was, are under the assumption that I expect something to happen about this in upcoming books? Because I obviously don't. The perfect timing for this to be addressed was in The Gathering Storm,

No we're not talking about the present. We're talking, at latest, of the contents of The Gathering Storm, as I corrected two posts ago.

I make it explicitly cleat that the time to bring it up was The Gathering Storm and that it would not make sense for it to be brought up now. And despite this, you just ridiculously claimed that I expect this to be brought up "now that the Tower is reunified", which is the exact opposite of what I claimed.


Incidentally, even rereading these posts, I still can't figure out how it is so difficult for you to understand my position.

Anyway, if the total sum of your argument that I am "incoherent and illogical" is that you can fabricate lies and have comprehension difficulties, I am not very convinced.

I am glad that you can prove your theory.


Unlike you, I dread looking like a fool, so I tend to make certain I can support my assertions. If I cannot, I apologise for my errors and try to put it behind me.

You're a psycho. I wrote you decent replies from the beginning and you immediately jumped on the snarky and sarcastic bandwagon instead of immediately stating that you thought I was missing your point and redressing it. Telling me to read the books, or that I don't understand core concepts - those are your tools in debating. If you'd addressed it politely this would have turned out differently, but I had to wade through paragraphs of your sarcasm and contempt, and darius had to fend off your acidic attacks. Instead you've made as if this is some sort of maligned conspiracy on my part, and you demand an apology. Well I'm sorry to disappoint you, but I was here to discuss the Red ajah. Too bad I was burned at the stake for my ideas.


Reality check: first words from your first post in this subthread:

You squabble like an old woman.


Oh, and you also insinuated that I was petty for caring about this issue. I am so sorry I couldn't maintain your exceedingly high standards of debate . But sarcasm aside, you're the one who came in condescending, and you have no place whining when I responded to you in kind. Now me, I assumed that was meant in humour and kept the theme in my answer to you. Really, if you were offended despite being the one to initiate it, I do apologise.

But the issue here is that when a misunderstanding arose, I tried to resolve it, while you instead didn't read my posts and went on wild accusatory rants against me, lied in order to shift the blame on me, and tried to get me to accept it and just scurry away through mocking and insults, doing everything in order to dodge your responsibility for the affair.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
Character discussion 2 : Siuan Sanche and Leane Sharif - 09/05/2010 06:01:33 PM 5023 Views
The "Shrinking of Siuan" after stilling destroyed my initial awe for the Amyrlin positition... - 09/05/2010 07:07:09 PM 1050 Views
yeah, but then again ... - 09/05/2010 09:05:36 PM 843 Views
That's total nonsense... - 10/05/2010 08:34:08 AM 1098 Views
No, THAT's total nonsense... - 10/05/2010 09:27:41 AM 970 Views
He raised other issues too - 10/05/2010 11:04:52 AM 964 Views
You seem to deal in bad analogies... - 10/05/2010 05:14:47 PM 972 Views
You've got an irritating manner about you. No wonder you find Aes Sedai so believable. - 10/05/2010 05:53:00 PM 827 Views
Hello Pot. I'm Kettle. - 10/05/2010 06:41:58 PM 839 Views
Hello Kettle. I'm Frying pan *NM* - 11/05/2010 03:43:20 PM 480 Views
Hello Frying pan. I'm Skillet. *NM* - 12/05/2010 11:50:33 PM 494 Views
I usually agree about his manner, but he's right here. - 12/05/2010 04:24:28 AM 922 Views
Re: No, THAT's total nonsense... - 19/05/2010 04:39:07 PM 877 Views
I think you're looking at it the wrong way. - 12/05/2010 06:32:00 AM 877 Views
Both wonderful characters... - 10/05/2010 12:49:44 AM 804 Views
They deserved to be deposed and stilled, I think ... - 10/05/2010 02:47:35 PM 1009 Views
"They"? - 10/05/2010 05:16:54 PM 907 Views
Good point ... - 10/05/2010 06:45:52 PM 1039 Views
Re: Good point ... - 10/05/2010 06:49:19 PM 929 Views
Re: Good point ... - 11/05/2010 03:43:43 PM 1093 Views
Leanne was not an Overseer - 17/05/2010 02:40:45 AM 924 Views
Re: "They"? - 11/05/2010 02:53:23 PM 965 Views
And she was eventually brought in on the secrets as well... - 12/05/2010 04:38:52 AM 915 Views
I don't know if I agree with this - 11/05/2010 03:19:20 PM 972 Views
The thing is ... - 11/05/2010 09:06:15 PM 886 Views
I get what you are saying, but the quote is from much earlier - 14/05/2010 03:14:17 PM 715 Views
I totally unagree... - 17/05/2010 11:16:50 AM 1114 Views
I like Leane, and respected Siuan until RJ mauled her character - 10/05/2010 05:55:08 PM 861 Views
She was probably the sacrificial lamb in place of Moiraine - 10/05/2010 06:25:39 PM 817 Views
The deck was certainly stacked against Siuan from the very beginning - 11/05/2010 02:44:05 PM 865 Views
This is a main reason I hope Siuan and Leanne get their full strength restored - 11/05/2010 02:25:31 PM 924 Views
I don't really agree - 11/05/2010 05:35:44 PM 851 Views
Re: I don't really agree - 11/05/2010 06:28:48 PM 925 Views
I hope so, as well. - 13/05/2010 05:31:36 PM 869 Views
Re: Character discussion 2 : Siuan Sanche and Leane Sharif - 11/05/2010 05:06:51 PM 1034 Views
I'm still annoyed that Siuan is not going to face the consequences of lying about the Reds. - 12/05/2010 05:18:47 AM 909 Views
In Egwene's defense, it would be hypocritical of her to bring that up after profiting from it - 12/05/2010 05:59:57 AM 882 Views
Oh, I never expected Egwene to do something about this. - 12/05/2010 06:12:35 AM 783 Views
Well she's off forging a relationship with the Asha'man - you know, useful stuff? *NM* - 12/05/2010 06:39:04 AM 540 Views
Are you claiming that Pevara was the only woman in the entire Red Ajah to be offended by that lie? *NM* - 12/05/2010 07:15:40 AM 482 Views
The Reds aren't petty - 12/05/2010 04:52:50 PM 759 Views
Are you kidding? - 12/05/2010 06:14:46 PM 880 Views
Unless of course there is truth to it - 17/05/2010 01:50:27 PM 887 Views
There is none. - 17/05/2010 07:09:59 PM 880 Views
Uhhh? - 17/05/2010 08:45:15 PM 791 Views
... - 17/05/2010 11:08:05 PM 932 Views
Re: ... - 18/05/2010 05:25:33 AM 865 Views
Seriously, are you kidding? [EDIT] - 18/05/2010 06:06:01 AM 850 Views
*sigh* - 18/05/2010 12:30:43 PM 908 Views
So, you're not kidding. - 18/05/2010 09:12:27 PM 812 Views
Re: So, you're not kidding. - 18/05/2010 10:25:19 PM 849 Views
Re: So, you're not kidding. - 19/05/2010 12:41:09 AM 943 Views
So, Tsutama... - 19/05/2010 05:29:56 PM 991 Views
Ugh. - 20/05/2010 04:05:43 AM 754 Views
WTF? - 20/05/2010 05:25:42 PM 819 Views
F-T is right - 19/05/2010 12:32:33 AM 919 Views
On the minority thing... - 18/05/2010 04:26:15 PM 883 Views
That's exactly the problem. - 18/05/2010 08:51:45 PM 751 Views
There is no rewriting... - 18/05/2010 08:57:50 PM 748 Views
Re: There is no rewriting... - 18/05/2010 09:21:31 PM 853 Views
Really do you have a quote supporting the fact that there has never been a FD supported by a Red? - 18/05/2010 09:39:31 PM 885 Views
Of course..., I'll provide it as soon as you prove you're not a Nazi serial child rapist. - 18/05/2010 10:06:23 PM 720 Views
why so pissy? - 19/05/2010 03:34:22 PM 879 Views
Sorry. - 20/05/2010 04:16:43 AM 844 Views
Re: Sorry. - 20/05/2010 08:19:13 AM 710 Views
Re: Sorry. - 20/05/2010 08:33:54 AM 910 Views
Re: Sorry. - 20/05/2010 01:26:47 PM 753 Views
Interesting. - 20/05/2010 07:34:45 PM 809 Views
Re: Interesting. - 21/05/2010 05:07:07 AM 830 Views
Re: Interesting. - 21/05/2010 06:28:05 AM 766 Views
LOL - 21/05/2010 02:50:29 PM 782 Views
... - 21/05/2010 08:23:08 PM 970 Views
There may be one explanation... - 13/05/2010 10:04:46 PM 796 Views
That doesn't make sense. - 13/05/2010 10:54:53 PM 922 Views
it was about more than just male channelers - 18/05/2010 09:50:14 PM 911 Views
Yes, that's true. - 18/05/2010 10:07:22 PM 927 Views
I'm also certain the majority of the Red had no clue/involvement - 20/05/2010 10:24:54 PM 827 Views
That's also true. - 20/05/2010 10:29:11 PM 814 Views
Okay I'm leaving you alone ... you clearly don't want to continue - 20/05/2010 10:31:01 PM 814 Views
Why are they lumped together? - 12/05/2010 05:53:51 AM 1072 Views
for practical purposes - 12/05/2010 04:50:48 PM 782 Views
AS shrunk after stilling; Siuan and Leane became huge. - 12/05/2010 10:50:50 PM 813 Views
Re: AS shrunk after stilling; Siuan and Leane became huge. - 12/05/2010 11:05:17 PM 933 Views
No, I don't think so - 13/05/2010 05:10:03 AM 751 Views
Let's just say we disagree. - 17/05/2010 11:15:31 PM 902 Views
Bah! - 18/05/2010 04:33:40 PM 841 Views
Pfft - 18/05/2010 05:31:16 PM 842 Views
You don't have to intimidate people to manipulate them. - 19/05/2010 12:46:02 AM 690 Views

Reply to Message