LMAO I love the way that Cannoli's lack of reply is taken of evidence of him understanding your post (especially how you lectured other posters on how the onus of evidence works).
I never said he understood my post, you claimed that three people did not understand my argument, and I simply demonstrated that Cannoli never showed anything to demonstrate that he didn't. You're the one to make the claim, so the onus of evidence is on you. Despite your dishonesty, I never claimed that Cannoli understood my post.
Fionwe called you incoherent and illogical, and the biggest fool in the world. His post is also aptly titled 'WTF?' This is powerful evidence in your favour that he understands your post and that you've reached an amicable agreement to agree to disagree. Lol.
Again, you are being dishonest. I never said anything about an amicable agreement. And I don't agree to disagree. Fionwe has perfectly justified reasons to be angry at me, given that I simply dropped the discussion without addressing any of his arguments, essentially snubbing him. I'd be angry too. However, he does understand my argument, given that he posted:
If by the above statement, you mean why no one brought this issue up to Egwene when she was a captive
As you can see, her comprehension of my position is perfectly fine, so again, you're the only one who has difficulty grasping the concept.
I explained in my other posts why I thought this. You bounce around between books 4 and 12 as if they're simultaneous events, and get angry when I suggest they're not. Just look at Fionwe's last post - he still doesn't know when exactly you're referring to Egwene. Neither do I. That makes you incoherent and illogical IMO.
You lie. I have never referred to this happening at any other time than during The Gathering Storm (or possibly Knife of Dreams). Observe:
Fanatic-Templar: Yeah, but you'd expect the Red Ajah to have said something about it in The Gathering Storm or something.
is it possible that you, like Cannoli was, are under the assumption that I expect something to happen about this in upcoming books? Because I obviously don't. The perfect timing for this to be addressed was in The Gathering Storm,
No we're not talking about the present. We're talking, at latest, of the contents of The Gathering Storm, as I corrected two posts ago.
I make it explicitly cleat that the time to bring it up was The Gathering Storm and that it would not make sense for it to be brought up now. And despite this, you just ridiculously claimed that I expect this to be brought up "now that the Tower is reunified", which is the exact opposite of what I claimed.
Incidentally, even rereading these posts, I still can't figure out how it is so difficult for you to understand my position.
Anyway, if the total sum of your argument that I am "incoherent and illogical" is that you can fabricate lies and have comprehension difficulties, I am not very convinced.
I am glad that you can prove your theory.
Unlike you, I dread looking like a fool, so I tend to make certain I can support my assertions. If I cannot, I apologise for my errors and try to put it behind me.
You're a psycho. I wrote you decent replies from the beginning and you immediately jumped on the snarky and sarcastic bandwagon instead of immediately stating that you thought I was missing your point and redressing it. Telling me to read the books, or that I don't understand core concepts - those are your tools in debating. If you'd addressed it politely this would have turned out differently, but I had to wade through paragraphs of your sarcasm and contempt, and darius had to fend off your acidic attacks. Instead you've made as if this is some sort of maligned conspiracy on my part, and you demand an apology. Well I'm sorry to disappoint you, but I was here to discuss the Red ajah. Too bad I was burned at the stake for my ideas.
Reality check: first words from your first post in this subthread:
You squabble like an old woman.
Oh, and you also insinuated that I was petty for caring about this issue. I am so sorry I couldn't maintain your exceedingly high standards of debate . But sarcasm aside, you're the one who came in condescending, and you have no place whining when I responded to you in kind. Now me, I assumed that was meant in humour and kept the theme in my answer to you. Really, if you were offended despite being the one to initiate it, I do apologise.
But the issue here is that when a misunderstanding arose, I tried to resolve it, while you instead didn't read my posts and went on wild accusatory rants against me, lied in order to shift the blame on me, and tried to get me to accept it and just scurry away through mocking and insults, doing everything in order to dodge your responsibility for the affair.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter
Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
~Master Splinter
Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Character discussion 2 : Siuan Sanche and Leane Sharif
09/05/2010 06:01:33 PM
- 5023 Views
The "Shrinking of Siuan" after stilling destroyed my initial awe for the Amyrlin positition...
09/05/2010 07:07:09 PM
- 1050 Views
That's total nonsense...
10/05/2010 08:34:08 AM
- 1098 Views
No, THAT's total nonsense...
10/05/2010 09:27:41 AM
- 970 Views
You seem to deal in bad analogies...
10/05/2010 05:14:47 PM
- 972 Views
You've got an irritating manner about you. No wonder you find Aes Sedai so believable.
10/05/2010 05:53:00 PM
- 827 Views
Hello Pot. I'm Kettle.
10/05/2010 06:41:58 PM
- 839 Views
Hello Kettle. I'm Frying pan *NM*
11/05/2010 03:43:20 PM
- 480 Views
Hello Frying pan. I'm Skillet. *NM*
12/05/2010 11:50:33 PM
- 494 Views
Re: Hello Skillet, I'm a baking sheet can't we all have some cookies and get along? *NM*
17/05/2010 05:17:24 PM
- 435 Views
All of those people EARNED their positions by being the best, not a compromise candidate for office!
12/05/2010 04:36:36 AM
- 1052 Views
Re: The "Shrinking of Siuan" after stilling destroyed my initial awe for the Amyrlin positition...
12/05/2010 04:23:07 AM
- 912 Views
Re: The "Shrinking of Siuan" after stilling destroyed my initial awe for the Amyrlin positition...
12/05/2010 06:33:37 AM
- 874 Views
They deserved to be deposed and stilled, I think ...
10/05/2010 02:47:35 PM
- 1009 Views
"They"?
10/05/2010 05:16:54 PM
- 907 Views
Good point ...
10/05/2010 06:45:52 PM
- 1039 Views
I don't know if I agree with this
11/05/2010 03:19:20 PM
- 972 Views
I like Leane, and respected Siuan until RJ mauled her character
10/05/2010 05:55:08 PM
- 861 Views
She was probably the sacrificial lamb in place of Moiraine
10/05/2010 06:25:39 PM
- 817 Views
The deck was certainly stacked against Siuan from the very beginning
11/05/2010 02:44:05 PM
- 865 Views
This is a main reason I hope Siuan and Leanne get their full strength restored
11/05/2010 02:25:31 PM
- 924 Views
I don't really agree
11/05/2010 05:35:44 PM
- 851 Views
I see your point and like I said, I think there are certainly other resolutions to the story line
11/05/2010 06:22:44 PM
- 830 Views
I'm still annoyed that Siuan is not going to face the consequences of lying about the Reds.
12/05/2010 05:18:47 AM
- 909 Views
In Egwene's defense, it would be hypocritical of her to bring that up after profiting from it
12/05/2010 05:59:57 AM
- 882 Views
Oh, I never expected Egwene to do something about this.
12/05/2010 06:12:35 AM
- 783 Views
Well she's off forging a relationship with the Asha'man - you know, useful stuff? *NM*
12/05/2010 06:39:04 AM
- 540 Views
Are you claiming that Pevara was the only woman in the entire Red Ajah to be offended by that lie? *NM*
12/05/2010 07:15:40 AM
- 482 Views
The Reds aren't petty
12/05/2010 04:52:50 PM
- 759 Views
Are you kidding?
12/05/2010 06:14:46 PM
- 880 Views
Unless of course there is truth to it
17/05/2010 01:50:27 PM
- 887 Views
There is none.
17/05/2010 07:09:59 PM
- 880 Views
Uhhh?
17/05/2010 08:45:15 PM
- 791 Views
...
17/05/2010 11:08:05 PM
- 932 Views
Re: ...
18/05/2010 05:25:33 AM
- 865 Views
Seriously, are you kidding? [EDIT]
18/05/2010 06:06:01 AM
- 850 Views
*sigh*
18/05/2010 12:30:43 PM
- 908 Views
So, you're not kidding.
18/05/2010 09:12:27 PM
- 812 Views
Re: So, you're not kidding.
18/05/2010 10:25:19 PM
- 849 Views
Re: So, you're not kidding.
19/05/2010 12:41:09 AM
- 943 Views
On the minority thing...
18/05/2010 04:26:15 PM
- 883 Views
That's exactly the problem.
18/05/2010 08:51:45 PM
- 751 Views
Really do you have a quote supporting the fact that there has never been a FD supported by a Red?
18/05/2010 09:39:31 PM
- 885 Views
Of course..., I'll provide it as soon as you prove you're not a Nazi serial child rapist.
18/05/2010 10:06:23 PM
- 720 Views
why so pissy?
19/05/2010 03:34:22 PM
- 879 Views
Sorry.
20/05/2010 04:16:43 AM
- 844 Views
Re: Sorry.
20/05/2010 08:19:13 AM
- 710 Views
Re: Sorry.
20/05/2010 08:33:54 AM
- 910 Views
Re: Sorry.
20/05/2010 01:26:47 PM
- 753 Views
Interesting.
20/05/2010 07:34:45 PM
- 809 Views
Re: Interesting.
21/05/2010 05:07:07 AM
- 830 Views
No worries! I was just caught off guard by your response... sorry for your stress! *NM*
20/05/2010 10:04:35 PM
- 582 Views
There may be one explanation...
13/05/2010 10:04:46 PM
- 796 Views
That doesn't make sense.
13/05/2010 10:54:53 PM
- 922 Views
it was about more than just male channelers
18/05/2010 09:50:14 PM
- 911 Views
Yes, that's true.
18/05/2010 10:07:22 PM
- 927 Views
I'm also certain the majority of the Red had no clue/involvement
20/05/2010 10:24:54 PM
- 827 Views
That's also true.
20/05/2010 10:29:11 PM
- 814 Views
Okay I'm leaving you alone ... you clearly don't want to continue
20/05/2010 10:31:01 PM
- 814 Views
AS shrunk after stilling; Siuan and Leane became huge.
12/05/2010 10:50:50 PM
- 813 Views
No, I don't think so
13/05/2010 05:10:03 AM
- 751 Views