Active Users:1106 Time:22/11/2024 09:19:58 PM
Interesting. Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 20/05/2010 07:34:45 PM
So you read a post, reply to it seventeen hours later without rereading it, based wholly on memory. That would actually explain a lot of the incoherence in your posts, actually. You're right that I never considered that possibility, but then again, you really should reread a post before replying to it. It would keep you from saying a lot of things that are outright wrong. Either way, it is irrelevant because I replied to you after your addendum, which you yourself admit "addressed my edit", therefore you admit that you perpetuated the thread with knowledge of what I had posted in that edit.

Oh, and you accused me of editing my post after you replied, not after you read it.

Your behaviour has been extremely childish throughout. I may have been in a bad mood, but my mood does not explain the decisions you've made.

You claim to not understand my point. That's certainly fair enough. It seems clear to me, but that does not mean that it would be clear to everyone or anyone else. If you had told me that you didn't understand, I could easily have explained it to you further, but instead you continued to rant on an erroneous assumption which made you look like you were ignorant of one of the core storylines in the series.

After I realised the source of the misunderstanding, I brought it up and tried to resolve it, but you shut me down and perpetuated the error. Upon realising this, you could have apologised, as I did to darius_sedai when I realised I was projecting my frustrations with you on someone who didn't deserve it, but instead you tried to shift the blame on me. It might hurt your ego a bit, but in the long run you'd look far better for resolving the situation than trying to dodge responsibility.

My question was an honest one. Why are you doing this, Sidious? I've had enough discussion with you over the years that I expect better from you.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
Character discussion 2 : Siuan Sanche and Leane Sharif - 09/05/2010 06:01:33 PM 5023 Views
The "Shrinking of Siuan" after stilling destroyed my initial awe for the Amyrlin positition... - 09/05/2010 07:07:09 PM 1050 Views
yeah, but then again ... - 09/05/2010 09:05:36 PM 843 Views
That's total nonsense... - 10/05/2010 08:34:08 AM 1098 Views
No, THAT's total nonsense... - 10/05/2010 09:27:41 AM 970 Views
He raised other issues too - 10/05/2010 11:04:52 AM 964 Views
You seem to deal in bad analogies... - 10/05/2010 05:14:47 PM 972 Views
You've got an irritating manner about you. No wonder you find Aes Sedai so believable. - 10/05/2010 05:53:00 PM 828 Views
Hello Pot. I'm Kettle. - 10/05/2010 06:41:58 PM 839 Views
Hello Kettle. I'm Frying pan *NM* - 11/05/2010 03:43:20 PM 480 Views
Hello Frying pan. I'm Skillet. *NM* - 12/05/2010 11:50:33 PM 494 Views
I usually agree about his manner, but he's right here. - 12/05/2010 04:24:28 AM 923 Views
Re: No, THAT's total nonsense... - 19/05/2010 04:39:07 PM 878 Views
I think you're looking at it the wrong way. - 12/05/2010 06:32:00 AM 877 Views
Both wonderful characters... - 10/05/2010 12:49:44 AM 804 Views
They deserved to be deposed and stilled, I think ... - 10/05/2010 02:47:35 PM 1009 Views
"They"? - 10/05/2010 05:16:54 PM 907 Views
Good point ... - 10/05/2010 06:45:52 PM 1039 Views
Re: Good point ... - 10/05/2010 06:49:19 PM 930 Views
Re: Good point ... - 11/05/2010 03:43:43 PM 1094 Views
Leanne was not an Overseer - 17/05/2010 02:40:45 AM 924 Views
Re: "They"? - 11/05/2010 02:53:23 PM 965 Views
And she was eventually brought in on the secrets as well... - 12/05/2010 04:38:52 AM 916 Views
I don't know if I agree with this - 11/05/2010 03:19:20 PM 972 Views
The thing is ... - 11/05/2010 09:06:15 PM 887 Views
I get what you are saying, but the quote is from much earlier - 14/05/2010 03:14:17 PM 716 Views
I totally unagree... - 17/05/2010 11:16:50 AM 1114 Views
I like Leane, and respected Siuan until RJ mauled her character - 10/05/2010 05:55:08 PM 861 Views
She was probably the sacrificial lamb in place of Moiraine - 10/05/2010 06:25:39 PM 817 Views
The deck was certainly stacked against Siuan from the very beginning - 11/05/2010 02:44:05 PM 865 Views
This is a main reason I hope Siuan and Leanne get their full strength restored - 11/05/2010 02:25:31 PM 924 Views
I don't really agree - 11/05/2010 05:35:44 PM 851 Views
Re: I don't really agree - 11/05/2010 06:28:48 PM 925 Views
I hope so, as well. - 13/05/2010 05:31:36 PM 869 Views
Re: Character discussion 2 : Siuan Sanche and Leane Sharif - 11/05/2010 05:06:51 PM 1035 Views
I'm still annoyed that Siuan is not going to face the consequences of lying about the Reds. - 12/05/2010 05:18:47 AM 909 Views
In Egwene's defense, it would be hypocritical of her to bring that up after profiting from it - 12/05/2010 05:59:57 AM 882 Views
Oh, I never expected Egwene to do something about this. - 12/05/2010 06:12:35 AM 783 Views
Well she's off forging a relationship with the Asha'man - you know, useful stuff? *NM* - 12/05/2010 06:39:04 AM 540 Views
Are you claiming that Pevara was the only woman in the entire Red Ajah to be offended by that lie? *NM* - 12/05/2010 07:15:40 AM 482 Views
The Reds aren't petty - 12/05/2010 04:52:50 PM 759 Views
Are you kidding? - 12/05/2010 06:14:46 PM 880 Views
Unless of course there is truth to it - 17/05/2010 01:50:27 PM 887 Views
There is none. - 17/05/2010 07:09:59 PM 881 Views
Uhhh? - 17/05/2010 08:45:15 PM 792 Views
... - 17/05/2010 11:08:05 PM 932 Views
Re: ... - 18/05/2010 05:25:33 AM 865 Views
Seriously, are you kidding? [EDIT] - 18/05/2010 06:06:01 AM 850 Views
*sigh* - 18/05/2010 12:30:43 PM 908 Views
So, you're not kidding. - 18/05/2010 09:12:27 PM 812 Views
Re: So, you're not kidding. - 18/05/2010 10:25:19 PM 849 Views
Re: So, you're not kidding. - 19/05/2010 12:41:09 AM 943 Views
So, Tsutama... - 19/05/2010 05:29:56 PM 992 Views
Ugh. - 20/05/2010 04:05:43 AM 754 Views
WTF? - 20/05/2010 05:25:42 PM 819 Views
F-T is right - 19/05/2010 12:32:33 AM 919 Views
On the minority thing... - 18/05/2010 04:26:15 PM 883 Views
That's exactly the problem. - 18/05/2010 08:51:45 PM 751 Views
There is no rewriting... - 18/05/2010 08:57:50 PM 748 Views
Re: There is no rewriting... - 18/05/2010 09:21:31 PM 853 Views
Really do you have a quote supporting the fact that there has never been a FD supported by a Red? - 18/05/2010 09:39:31 PM 885 Views
Of course..., I'll provide it as soon as you prove you're not a Nazi serial child rapist. - 18/05/2010 10:06:23 PM 720 Views
why so pissy? - 19/05/2010 03:34:22 PM 879 Views
Sorry. - 20/05/2010 04:16:43 AM 845 Views
Re: Sorry. - 20/05/2010 08:19:13 AM 711 Views
Re: Sorry. - 20/05/2010 08:33:54 AM 910 Views
Re: Sorry. - 20/05/2010 01:26:47 PM 753 Views
Interesting. - 20/05/2010 07:34:45 PM 810 Views
Re: Interesting. - 21/05/2010 05:07:07 AM 831 Views
Re: Interesting. - 21/05/2010 06:28:05 AM 766 Views
LOL - 21/05/2010 02:50:29 PM 782 Views
... - 21/05/2010 08:23:08 PM 970 Views
There may be one explanation... - 13/05/2010 10:04:46 PM 796 Views
That doesn't make sense. - 13/05/2010 10:54:53 PM 922 Views
it was about more than just male channelers - 18/05/2010 09:50:14 PM 911 Views
Yes, that's true. - 18/05/2010 10:07:22 PM 927 Views
I'm also certain the majority of the Red had no clue/involvement - 20/05/2010 10:24:54 PM 827 Views
That's also true. - 20/05/2010 10:29:11 PM 814 Views
Okay I'm leaving you alone ... you clearly don't want to continue - 20/05/2010 10:31:01 PM 814 Views
Why are they lumped together? - 12/05/2010 05:53:51 AM 1072 Views
for practical purposes - 12/05/2010 04:50:48 PM 782 Views
AS shrunk after stilling; Siuan and Leane became huge. - 12/05/2010 10:50:50 PM 813 Views
Re: AS shrunk after stilling; Siuan and Leane became huge. - 12/05/2010 11:05:17 PM 933 Views
No, I don't think so - 13/05/2010 05:10:03 AM 751 Views
Let's just say we disagree. - 17/05/2010 11:15:31 PM 902 Views
Bah! - 18/05/2010 04:33:40 PM 841 Views
Pfft - 18/05/2010 05:31:16 PM 842 Views
You don't have to intimidate people to manipulate them. - 19/05/2010 12:46:02 AM 690 Views

Reply to Message