Active Users:374 Time:12/04/2025 04:24:51 AM
Re: Take two Datakim Send a noteboard - 18/05/2010 01:35:46 AM
I think if you go back and read my response again, you'll find that I already answered your questions.


Umm, maybe I missed it, could you quickly answer it again.

I mean I recall that I talked to you about balefire before and asked you why for example Cadsuane could not just reverse Rand's death by balefiring Gawyn and essentially making it so that Rand had not died in the first place. Cadsuane would do it considering how utterly critical Rand is.

I think you answered that Cadsuane could not balefire Gawyn, because Rand&Gawyn would basically kill eachother and therefore Gawyn would be dead and no longer available for balefiring. Am I right? This is a good enough answer.

The question that has occurred to me is that since Rand KNOWS what balefire is and what it does, if Rand were to be critically injured by Gawyn, WHY would Rand retaliate at that point rather than just hedge his bet and let Gawyn go on living in the hope that Cadsuane or someone will hopefully hunt him down and balefire Gawyn and revive him that way.

The only answer I can see to this is that either

a)Rand is an idiot who ignores the possibility of Balefire "healing" him from Gawyn's attack. I would like to think that after his revelation at Dragonmount he will act smarter in the future and as such not be an idiot.

or

b)Rand and Gawyn will injure each other simultaneously the way Rand did with Ishamael at Falme. But this explanation is weak in that given how sickly&injured Rand is, I don't really believe that Rand is capable of such a feat anymore with someone as skilled with the sword as Gawyn.


So basically, I now wonder why is it that if your theory becomes true, Rand would not just let Gawyn go DESPITE the fact that Gawyn just killed so that Gawyn would still be alive and available for balefiring and therefore Cadsuane could bring Rand back from the dead.

Unless you think that Rand is still physically capable of matching Gawyn enough to kill him the same time that Gawyn returns the favor.
Reply to message
My new 'loony' theory - 03/05/2010 11:09:52 AM 2328 Views
Hehe, yeah, we can also discuss it here... - 03/05/2010 12:04:57 PM 1221 Views
Good deal. You're still being prejudiced, though. - 03/05/2010 12:20:00 PM 1350 Views
Of course, I prefer my theory.... - 03/05/2010 01:01:07 PM 1086 Views
I suppose it's better than Beslan - 03/05/2010 01:19:52 PM 1263 Views
He, Beslan being Berelain's man in white was a most brilliant theory! - 03/05/2010 01:55:07 PM 1209 Views
See, this is why I am right and you are wrong! - 04/05/2010 03:56:31 AM 1031 Views
In my view - 04/05/2010 10:07:02 AM 968 Views
Still prejudiced, of course... - 04/05/2010 10:24:53 AM 1081 Views
Just disagreeing - 04/05/2010 11:15:44 AM 1057 Views
And repeating yourself. But I have evidence. - 04/05/2010 12:24:06 PM 1044 Views
Well... - 04/05/2010 01:10:17 PM 952 Views
This is getting silly - 04/05/2010 01:27:56 PM 932 Views
Mat's reasons for giving up the foxhead ter'angreal - 03/05/2010 03:53:43 PM 1154 Views
Why only the gholam? - 04/05/2010 04:00:18 AM 1024 Views
Re: My new 'loony' theory - 03/05/2010 04:27:12 PM 1117 Views
cool people change the subject line - 04/05/2010 04:14:18 AM 1176 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line - 04/05/2010 06:43:01 AM 943 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line - 04/05/2010 07:32:24 AM 1028 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line - 04/05/2010 08:31:47 AM 1157 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line - 04/05/2010 09:27:51 AM 1100 Views
oops *NM* - 04/05/2010 09:28:11 AM 642 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line - 04/05/2010 03:17:42 PM 1114 Views
I dont claim to be but didnt you say cool people change the subject line? - 05/05/2010 02:41:49 AM 1050 Views
Yes. What of it? *NM* - 05/05/2010 03:22:34 AM 651 Views
Re: My new 'loony' theory - 04/05/2010 04:44:28 AM 1107 Views
what comments by Brandon, and what flaws? - 04/05/2010 04:49:29 AM 1090 Views
Re: what comments by Brandon, and what flaws? - 05/05/2010 02:34:33 AM 1242 Views
Thanks. - 05/05/2010 03:21:53 AM 1135 Views
No go. *NM* - 03/11/2010 03:14:13 AM 565 Views
Who draws it out shall follow after - 04/05/2010 12:33:56 PM 1158 Views
I don't think.... - 04/05/2010 01:22:21 PM 1041 Views
Gawyn promised not to raise a hand against Rand - 06/05/2010 12:59:47 AM 888 Views
Indeed he did. - 06/05/2010 07:23:44 AM 1276 Views
But... - 06/05/2010 08:52:04 AM 1090 Views
Just because it makes more sense to you doesn't make it more likely. I have evidence! - 06/05/2010 09:57:52 AM 920 Views
Well... - 06/05/2010 11:12:42 AM 1025 Views
*sigh* - 06/05/2010 01:41:03 PM 1119 Views
I'm still hoping to dissuade you from this crazy idea! - 06/05/2010 02:07:54 PM 1085 Views
You won't. - 06/05/2010 02:11:42 PM 1040 Views
Gawyn agreed that he would talk with Elayne about this topic - 06/05/2010 02:32:55 PM 1151 Views
Reading comprehension issues. *NM* - 06/05/2010 02:43:28 PM 617 Views
Ah, come on, it's fun to discuss! - 06/05/2010 02:49:01 PM 954 Views
the problem there - 07/05/2010 05:45:23 AM 987 Views
more to the point - 07/05/2010 04:45:40 AM 1021 Views
considering Rand won't hurt Elayne - 07/05/2010 05:46:23 AM 944 Views
wow - 06/05/2010 01:46:22 AM 1078 Views
thanks! - 06/05/2010 07:25:25 AM 901 Views
Re: thanks! - 12/05/2010 10:50:50 PM 981 Views
Nice theory ... - 07/05/2010 06:25:29 PM 1121 Views
Or Elayne could just give it to Gawyn. - 07/05/2010 07:34:44 PM 1031 Views
True, but I prefer the idea that he'll steal it because ... - 07/05/2010 08:32:29 PM 969 Views
Thanks - 08/05/2010 07:56:17 AM 959 Views
Nice! But how about.... - 12/05/2010 01:58:00 PM 1194 Views
They'll kill each other - 12/05/2010 02:22:18 PM 886 Views
Also - 12/05/2010 09:06:25 PM 1013 Views
Re: Also - 12/05/2010 10:49:51 PM 983 Views
Actually - 12/05/2010 11:50:26 PM 1126 Views
Take two - 17/05/2010 07:33:35 PM 966 Views
Re: Take two - 17/05/2010 11:45:08 PM 980 Views
Re: Take two - 18/05/2010 12:52:10 AM 1038 Views
Re: Take two - 18/05/2010 01:35:46 AM 1122 Views
Re: Take two - 18/05/2010 01:45:24 AM 1053 Views
Re: Take two - 18/05/2010 03:22:37 AM 1177 Views
Re: Take two - 18/05/2010 06:32:57 AM 1016 Views
Re: Take two - 18/05/2010 07:11:08 PM 891 Views
Re: Take two - 18/05/2010 10:07:36 PM 956 Views
From DomA's World Con report - 18/05/2010 10:42:48 PM 945 Views
Yeah, we knew that... - 19/05/2010 08:25:04 AM 1181 Views

Reply to Message