Active Users:560 Time:24/11/2024 01:13:26 PM
Re: Intuitively obvious, my dear Watson saidarisnowtainted Send a noteboard - 14/05/2010 01:28:38 AM
I think the mystery has been exacerbated by the way RJ explained things. I've been trying to take his statements and boil them down--i think it may help to understand what he meant if we try to re-word his explanation while preserving his meaning.

I've come to boil it down as follows: By saying it is intuitively obvious, RJ is saying that the answer pops out -- it comes to you -- it is a passive revelation, not a mystery solved.

He shows us how the identity pops out.

He placed one person at the scene of the murder.

If you identify the person who was at the scene you have identified the murder.

He said that we should determine every person's location at the time of the murder.

He told us how to determine everyone's location. We need to determine where the timing of events puts everyone at the time.

So, take the timing of events and map it out. Who is situated at the scene OR consider people moving from point A to point B crossing paths at the time and place.




Reply to message
Intuitively obvious, my dear Watson - 22/03/2010 01:53:54 AM 1793 Views
idle speculation != "Intuitivly obvious" - 22/03/2010 03:01:10 AM 563 Views
The best explanation for the "intuitively obvious"-comment is... - 22/03/2010 09:41:32 AM 582 Views
So again...how would Slayer know he was in the hallway? - 22/03/2010 03:18:51 PM 582 Views
I think Slayer spied on Asmo - 22/03/2010 03:45:20 PM 449 Views
Fair enough.... - 22/03/2010 06:25:25 PM 606 Views
I think... - 23/03/2010 09:31:41 AM 516 Views
I agree. Slayer is the most intuitively obvious candidate. *NM* - 22/03/2010 06:29:07 PM 215 Views
Slayer....the book4 minor villian? *NM* - 22/03/2010 06:34:52 PM 355 Views
Slayer actually was a major villian in TSR. - 23/03/2010 09:11:39 AM 409 Views
Re: Slayer actually was a major villian in TSR. - 28/03/2010 07:16:59 PM 450 Views
In my view, Graendal might have sent Slayer, which would explain her knowledge. *NM* - 29/03/2010 09:45:14 AM 450 Views
Actually that's one of my hang-ups about Slayer too - 06/04/2010 02:27:22 PM 426 Views
As far as I'm concerned... - 25/03/2010 06:42:53 AM 438 Views
The problem is that people don't read the books or at least ignore what is said about Slayer... - 25/03/2010 09:41:09 AM 428 Views
Correction... - 25/03/2010 05:22:46 PM 415 Views
So, basically... - 25/03/2010 05:50:42 PM 419 Views
The clues are there? - 25/03/2010 06:29:16 PM 435 Views
Re: The clues are there? - 26/03/2010 12:51:43 AM 405 Views
He wasn't being insulting, I don't think. - 26/03/2010 02:16:26 AM 456 Views
well, RJ was a nuclear engineer. 'Nuff said about obviousness, huh? - 26/03/2010 04:38:00 AM 461 Views
Apparently... - 26/03/2010 08:58:32 AM 430 Views
No it isn't. - 26/03/2010 05:43:02 PM 416 Views
You don't understand... - 27/03/2010 09:11:35 AM 445 Views
Re: You don't understand... - 27/03/2010 05:23:35 PM 448 Views
Re: You don't understand... - 28/03/2010 08:17:40 PM 409 Views
Yes, it's Winter's Heart. - 29/03/2010 04:01:41 AM 420 Views
Both merged into one being - 29/03/2010 09:43:47 AM 459 Views
Not what I asked. - 29/03/2010 06:10:42 PM 402 Views
If he couldn't do this... - 29/03/2010 06:59:16 PM 440 Views
Re: If he couldn't do this... - 29/03/2010 07:46:39 PM 403 Views
That Basel Gill comparison just silly... - 29/03/2010 08:49:19 PM 443 Views
Clearly, one of you has proved that Basel Gill is Demandred *NM* - 29/03/2010 10:12:00 PM 215 Views
I've asked you only one question, repeatedly. - 30/03/2010 12:34:44 AM 484 Views
Yeah, and I repeatedly tried to show you the clues... - 30/03/2010 09:17:59 AM 417 Views
You have never provided anything even resembling evidence. - 30/03/2010 08:20:54 PM 384 Views
Dude - 30/03/2010 09:49:05 PM 374 Views
You know what's really embarrassing? - 30/03/2010 10:28:38 PM 500 Views
be nice *NM* - 31/03/2010 01:22:03 AM 205 Views
One last time... - 31/03/2010 09:18:01 AM 417 Views
Re: One last time... - 31/03/2010 06:20:24 PM 415 Views
No... - 31/03/2010 06:31:57 PM 401 Views
Re: No... - 31/03/2010 11:43:42 PM 444 Views
So... - 01/04/2010 10:22:31 AM 404 Views
Re: So... - 01/04/2010 06:41:34 PM 503 Views
Egwene did it though - 09/04/2010 02:26:10 AM 420 Views
Not before Lord of Chaos she didn't. - 09/04/2010 08:03:12 AM 401 Views
Rand does it in the end of TFoH, though, shortly before Asmo's death. *NM* - 09/04/2010 08:34:23 AM 217 Views
But we don't actually see that - 09/04/2010 12:23:37 PM 404 Views
Hmm. True, that. - 09/04/2010 07:28:15 PM 353 Views
I see what you are saying now - 09/04/2010 12:08:00 PM 372 Views
Yep - 09/04/2010 07:27:27 PM 388 Views
A question on balefire/2 servants - 24/03/2010 04:31:49 PM 371 Views
Re: A question on balefire/2 servants - 24/03/2010 05:03:32 PM 380 Views
First rule of balefire: - 25/03/2010 06:44:17 AM 382 Views
Yep, that's my understanding too. - 25/03/2010 07:00:39 PM 401 Views
On the servants theory - 25/03/2010 11:33:08 AM 377 Views
Rand's odd wounds - 29/03/2010 02:48:58 AM 366 Views
Who says the Dark One couldn't bring Asmodean back? Why would he want to? - 25/03/2010 05:50:55 AM 453 Views
RJ said that. *NM* - 25/03/2010 09:31:32 AM 353 Views
Do you have that quote handy? - 28/03/2010 07:01:06 PM 386 Views
From memory, but can't find the URL - 28/03/2010 08:09:29 PM 373 Views
Here: - 29/03/2010 09:48:36 AM 376 Views
thanks! good job *NM* - 29/03/2010 10:13:12 PM 177 Views
You dont address all the criteria - 30/03/2010 11:27:58 PM 378 Views
Did you mean me? *NM* - 31/03/2010 05:54:56 AM 176 Views
@Fanatic-Templar: Proof Slayer can't travel through T'A'R... - 31/03/2010 03:54:19 AM 380 Views
Exactly my point. - 31/03/2010 05:02:41 AM 390 Views
Maybe none of it matters anyway, Slayer will go down like a punk and I know how it goes - 31/03/2010 05:56:46 AM 428 Views
Lan can swordfight with his boots? *NM* - 31/03/2010 06:41:53 AM 193 Views
I don't think so... read again *NM* - 31/03/2010 10:54:03 PM 169 Views
Re: Maybe none of it matters anyway, Slayer will go down like a punk and I know how it goes - 31/03/2010 03:52:16 PM 402 Views
thanks! but as soon as I posted - 01/04/2010 03:43:59 AM 377 Views
Re: Intuitively obvious, my dear Watson - 14/05/2010 01:28:38 AM 426 Views

Reply to Message