A few thoughts.
The idea of Mat's Medallion going from Mat -> Elayne -> Alivia -> Gawyn seems a little too convoluted, to me. A more fitting scenario, I think, would be for Mat to give it to Elayne (as you suggested) and then for Gawyn to steal it from her (after overhearing what it does) to go confront Rand.
Yes, Alivia needs to be involved in Rand's death somehow, but to say that Gawyn looting Alivia's corpse somehow qualifies as "Alivia helping Rand die" just doesn't wash, for me.
I also think Mat's betrayal of Rand (if indeed it does occur) needs to be more blatant than this. No one would ever fault Mat (and label him a betrayer) for giving the medallion to Elayne (the mother of Rand's children, no less!), even if it did end up in Gawyn's hand sometime thereafter, and led to Rand's death. Now, if Mat were to give it directly to Gawyn, THAT would qualify (even if he didn't know the truth behind why Gawyn wanted it). But, I think the idea of Gawyn stealing the Medallion from Elayne is more plausible.
As for Alivia, I think a better scenario (to fit with your theory) would be that Rand lays dying after having been mortally wounded by Gawyn, and Alivia does something that ulimately kills him, but also (somehow) helps enable his subsequent resurrection/reincarnation (what she might do I have no idea - if Nynaeve rips him from TAR after he dies, as has been theorized before, Alivia shouldn't have to do anything to help enable that). I suppose she could just ease his passing, but I think her involvement in Rand's death needs to be more significant than that, given Min's viewing. Regardless, Alivia could then go die in her blaze of glory, as you suggested.
Lastly, I like your idea that the "Seanchan woman with the sword" from Egwene's dream is Tuon with Justice, and even the idea that Egeanin is the one to convey Justice from Rand's dead body to Tuon seems plausible enough. But there is no way that scenario has anything to do with the "who draws it out shall follow after" prophecy. The first 2 lines in that prophecy certainly refer to Rand putting callandor back into the heart of the Stone (in TSR) to hold the Tearan's hearts, and therefore the whole prophecy must refer to callandor, not Justice. I don't see how the first two lines could possibly refer to Rand stabbing Gawyn. Whose hearts would he be holding, in that case?
Anyway ... I'm just nitpicking details, here. I like the theory a lot, in general. To me, how it links to Arthurian legend is the most solid "evidence", and you did a good job tying the whole theory into the various prophecies/viewings/foretellings we know about.
The idea of Mat's Medallion going from Mat -> Elayne -> Alivia -> Gawyn seems a little too convoluted, to me. A more fitting scenario, I think, would be for Mat to give it to Elayne (as you suggested) and then for Gawyn to steal it from her (after overhearing what it does) to go confront Rand.
Yes, Alivia needs to be involved in Rand's death somehow, but to say that Gawyn looting Alivia's corpse somehow qualifies as "Alivia helping Rand die" just doesn't wash, for me.
I also think Mat's betrayal of Rand (if indeed it does occur) needs to be more blatant than this. No one would ever fault Mat (and label him a betrayer) for giving the medallion to Elayne (the mother of Rand's children, no less!), even if it did end up in Gawyn's hand sometime thereafter, and led to Rand's death. Now, if Mat were to give it directly to Gawyn, THAT would qualify (even if he didn't know the truth behind why Gawyn wanted it). But, I think the idea of Gawyn stealing the Medallion from Elayne is more plausible.
As for Alivia, I think a better scenario (to fit with your theory) would be that Rand lays dying after having been mortally wounded by Gawyn, and Alivia does something that ulimately kills him, but also (somehow) helps enable his subsequent resurrection/reincarnation (what she might do I have no idea - if Nynaeve rips him from TAR after he dies, as has been theorized before, Alivia shouldn't have to do anything to help enable that). I suppose she could just ease his passing, but I think her involvement in Rand's death needs to be more significant than that, given Min's viewing. Regardless, Alivia could then go die in her blaze of glory, as you suggested.
Lastly, I like your idea that the "Seanchan woman with the sword" from Egwene's dream is Tuon with Justice, and even the idea that Egeanin is the one to convey Justice from Rand's dead body to Tuon seems plausible enough. But there is no way that scenario has anything to do with the "who draws it out shall follow after" prophecy. The first 2 lines in that prophecy certainly refer to Rand putting callandor back into the heart of the Stone (in TSR) to hold the Tearan's hearts, and therefore the whole prophecy must refer to callandor, not Justice. I don't see how the first two lines could possibly refer to Rand stabbing Gawyn. Whose hearts would he be holding, in that case?
Anyway ... I'm just nitpicking details, here. I like the theory a lot, in general. To me, how it links to Arthurian legend is the most solid "evidence", and you did a good job tying the whole theory into the various prophecies/viewings/foretellings we know about.
Rise and fall, turn the Wheel,
'cause all life is
is really just a circle.
-BHT&tM
'cause all life is
is really just a circle.
-BHT&tM
My new 'loony' theory
03/05/2010 11:09:52 AM
- 2238 Views
Hehe, yeah, we can also discuss it here...
03/05/2010 12:04:57 PM
- 1129 Views
Good deal. You're still being prejudiced, though.
03/05/2010 12:20:00 PM
- 1257 Views
Of course, I prefer my theory....
03/05/2010 01:01:07 PM
- 990 Views
I suppose it's better than Beslan
03/05/2010 01:19:52 PM
- 1167 Views
He, Beslan being Berelain's man in white was a most brilliant theory!
03/05/2010 01:55:07 PM
- 1118 Views
See, this is why I am right and you are wrong!
04/05/2010 03:56:31 AM
- 939 Views
In my view
04/05/2010 10:07:02 AM
- 879 Views
Still prejudiced, of course...
04/05/2010 10:24:53 AM
- 992 Views
Just disagreeing
04/05/2010 11:15:44 AM
- 968 Views
And repeating yourself. But I have evidence.
04/05/2010 12:24:06 PM
- 948 Views
Well...
04/05/2010 01:10:17 PM
- 869 Views
This is getting silly
04/05/2010 01:27:56 PM
- 867 Views
Yeah, I think as well that we have sufficiently exchanged our views on this matter! *NM*
04/05/2010 02:18:09 PM
- 458 Views
Re: My new 'loony' theory
03/05/2010 04:27:12 PM
- 1028 Views
cool people change the subject line
04/05/2010 04:14:18 AM
- 1070 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line
04/05/2010 06:43:01 AM
- 860 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line
04/05/2010 07:32:24 AM
- 924 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line
04/05/2010 08:31:47 AM
- 1070 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line
04/05/2010 09:27:51 AM
- 1011 Views
I dont claim to be but didnt you say cool people change the subject line?
05/05/2010 02:41:49 AM
- 951 Views
Yes. What of it? *NM*
05/05/2010 03:22:34 AM
- 616 Views
now you're a cool kid again? *NM*
05/05/2010 03:23:49 AM
- 553 Views
It was originally a comment on those who normally dwell here (and also did at Wotmania of course) *NM*
05/05/2010 03:25:17 AM
- 540 Views
Re: My new 'loony' theory
04/05/2010 04:44:28 AM
- 1031 Views
what comments by Brandon, and what flaws?
04/05/2010 04:49:29 AM
- 999 Views
Gawyn promised not to raise a hand against Rand
06/05/2010 12:59:47 AM
- 803 Views
Indeed he did.
06/05/2010 07:23:44 AM
- 1183 Views
But...
06/05/2010 08:52:04 AM
- 994 Views
Just because it makes more sense to you doesn't make it more likely. I have evidence!
06/05/2010 09:57:52 AM
- 828 Views
Well...
06/05/2010 11:12:42 AM
- 931 Views
*sigh*
06/05/2010 01:41:03 PM
- 1027 Views
I'm still hoping to dissuade you from this crazy idea!
06/05/2010 02:07:54 PM
- 985 Views
You won't.
06/05/2010 02:11:42 PM
- 954 Views
Gawyn agreed that he would talk with Elayne about this topic
06/05/2010 02:32:55 PM
- 1049 Views
Nice theory ...
07/05/2010 06:25:29 PM
- 1022 Views
Take two
17/05/2010 07:33:35 PM
- 883 Views
Re: Take two
17/05/2010 11:45:08 PM
- 919 Views
Re: Take two
18/05/2010 12:52:10 AM
- 971 Views
Re: Take two
18/05/2010 01:35:46 AM
- 1036 Views
Re: Take two
18/05/2010 01:45:24 AM
- 967 Views