Etzel thinks it is loony anyway (I think he is just attached to his own theory and therefore prejudiced). I was arguing with him about it at Dragonmount, but now Dragonmount won't load, so I figured I'd link it here.
I just came up with this a couple of days ago, so the version posted at Theoryland is sort of a draft version (I come up with a new idea on it every hour or two), so I will probably be tweaking some details in the future. I'm pretty certain about the gist of it, though: Gawyn will end up with Mat's medallion, which will enable him to kill Rand. Sounds random, but it's not. Really.
I just came up with this a couple of days ago, so the version posted at Theoryland is sort of a draft version (I come up with a new idea on it every hour or two), so I will probably be tweaking some details in the future. I'm pretty certain about the gist of it, though: Gawyn will end up with Mat's medallion, which will enable him to kill Rand. Sounds random, but it's not. Really.
Some questions.
1. You think that Gawyn will get his hands on Mat's medallion and use that to counter Rand's OP advantage. However is this actually required?
I mean Rand's channeling sickness has advanced to the point that grabbing hold of the power nearly knocks him out. So long as Gawyn surprises Rand even slightly, he could certaily kill Rand without needing the amulet, while Rand was still throwing up. And I don't know if Rand truly knows how utterly stupid/insane Gawyn is so he likely won't grab hold of the power before meeting him, especially if the meeting happens in a public place like Caemlyn.
I figure the sickness is caused by Rand's link with Moridin, so I doubt his return to sanity will have cured this, so unless Gawyn's attack happens after Moridin is dead, the medallion will not really be necessary for Gawyn to kill Rand since Rand will be unable to use OP to defend himself anyway.
2. Gawyn being able to kill Rand presumes that Rand is alone. I would expect that after his revelation at the end of TGH, he would go back to his allies and friends. If so Gawyn might well be able to win against Rand, but can he win against the Aiel/Aes Sedai bodyguards. Especially people who know how to get past the medallion.
3. For that matter do we know for sure that Rand could not get past it? I mean he has LTT's memories at this point, and he also knows about the medallion and what it does. He has also seen Mat die by a lightning strike from Rahvin so he knows full well its weaknessess. I figure if Rand has even a little time, he will be able to realise how Gawyn is protected and take him out anyway.
Ofcourse it is possible that Rand will be utterly surprised and won't have any time to attack Gawyn with indirect weaves, but again in this case the medallion won't be required anyway.
4. Would Cadsuane&Co really let Rand stay dead? I mean presumably her knowledge of Balefire means that she knows how to weave it. Even if Gawyn does manage to kill Rand, why would Cadsuane not zap the idiot and bring Rand back? It is certainly worth the price considering how important Rand is compared to the nobody that Gawyn is.
5. And just to throw in the possibility, if nothing else, Rand could use the True Power to kill Gawyn. The medallion being designed to counter OP would likely do nothing for that. I am unsure if the new and improved Rand would be willing to use TP again, even to save himself, but the option is there.
My new 'loony' theory
03/05/2010 11:09:52 AM
- 2238 Views
Hehe, yeah, we can also discuss it here...
03/05/2010 12:04:57 PM
- 1130 Views
Good deal. You're still being prejudiced, though.
03/05/2010 12:20:00 PM
- 1258 Views
Of course, I prefer my theory....
03/05/2010 01:01:07 PM
- 990 Views
I suppose it's better than Beslan
03/05/2010 01:19:52 PM
- 1169 Views
He, Beslan being Berelain's man in white was a most brilliant theory!
03/05/2010 01:55:07 PM
- 1119 Views
See, this is why I am right and you are wrong!
04/05/2010 03:56:31 AM
- 940 Views
In my view
04/05/2010 10:07:02 AM
- 879 Views
Still prejudiced, of course...
04/05/2010 10:24:53 AM
- 992 Views
Just disagreeing
04/05/2010 11:15:44 AM
- 968 Views
And repeating yourself. But I have evidence.
04/05/2010 12:24:06 PM
- 949 Views
Well...
04/05/2010 01:10:17 PM
- 870 Views
This is getting silly
04/05/2010 01:27:56 PM
- 868 Views
Yeah, I think as well that we have sufficiently exchanged our views on this matter! *NM*
04/05/2010 02:18:09 PM
- 458 Views
Re: My new 'loony' theory
03/05/2010 04:27:12 PM
- 1030 Views
cool people change the subject line
04/05/2010 04:14:18 AM
- 1071 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line
04/05/2010 06:43:01 AM
- 861 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line
04/05/2010 07:32:24 AM
- 924 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line
04/05/2010 08:31:47 AM
- 1070 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line
04/05/2010 09:27:51 AM
- 1012 Views
I dont claim to be but didnt you say cool people change the subject line?
05/05/2010 02:41:49 AM
- 951 Views
Yes. What of it? *NM*
05/05/2010 03:22:34 AM
- 616 Views
now you're a cool kid again? *NM*
05/05/2010 03:23:49 AM
- 553 Views
It was originally a comment on those who normally dwell here (and also did at Wotmania of course) *NM*
05/05/2010 03:25:17 AM
- 540 Views
Re: My new 'loony' theory
04/05/2010 04:44:28 AM
- 1032 Views
what comments by Brandon, and what flaws?
04/05/2010 04:49:29 AM
- 1000 Views
Gawyn promised not to raise a hand against Rand
06/05/2010 12:59:47 AM
- 803 Views
Indeed he did.
06/05/2010 07:23:44 AM
- 1183 Views
But...
06/05/2010 08:52:04 AM
- 996 Views
Just because it makes more sense to you doesn't make it more likely. I have evidence!
06/05/2010 09:57:52 AM
- 829 Views
Well...
06/05/2010 11:12:42 AM
- 932 Views
*sigh*
06/05/2010 01:41:03 PM
- 1027 Views
I'm still hoping to dissuade you from this crazy idea!
06/05/2010 02:07:54 PM
- 985 Views
You won't.
06/05/2010 02:11:42 PM
- 956 Views
Gawyn agreed that he would talk with Elayne about this topic
06/05/2010 02:32:55 PM
- 1050 Views
Nice theory ...
07/05/2010 06:25:29 PM
- 1022 Views
Take two
17/05/2010 07:33:35 PM
- 883 Views
Re: Take two
17/05/2010 11:45:08 PM
- 919 Views
Re: Take two
18/05/2010 12:52:10 AM
- 972 Views
Re: Take two
18/05/2010 01:35:46 AM
- 1036 Views
Re: Take two
18/05/2010 01:45:24 AM
- 968 Views