While reading WOT I would often say to myself something to the likes of "would he get to the point already", or "would he pick a direction". Looking back, so much of the character of WOT came from the style and pace of the writing that the story would seem 'less' if it had been written any other way. It just would not have been as interesting. The chapter needed a subtlety that just wasn't there. A little bit of ambiguity would have went a long way.
I NEVER had a complaint with the style or pace. I have been saying for YEARS on the WoTMB to anyone who complained about the decriptions and mannerisms and whatnot that it would not be same without that stuff. I have been proven right.
It still had too much description. Therefore you have been proven wrong.
The good news is that we got another 6500 words of WoT with nothing happening.
*MySmiley*
I'm drinkin' some George Jones,
and a little bit of Coe
Haggard's easin' my misery
and Waylon's keepin' me from home
Hank's givin' me those high times-
Cash is gonna sing it low
I'm here gettin' wasted-
just like my country heroes -Hank III
I'm drinkin' some George Jones,
and a little bit of Coe
Haggard's easin' my misery
and Waylon's keepin' me from home
Hank's givin' me those high times-
Cash is gonna sing it low
I'm here gettin' wasted-
just like my country heroes -Hank III
This is not RJ's writing. (No Spoilers)
05/09/2009 03:46:26 AM
- 1714 Views
How long is it? I kinda wanna read it now, but I'm at work, so I'm not sure if I have time. *NM*
05/09/2009 03:55:02 AM
- 324 Views
Bah, so am I. 4.5 pages on Microsoft Word. Single space, no margin, Arial font, size 9.
05/09/2009 04:02:13 AM
- 673 Views
Yeah, it was actually a fairly quick read..no trouble at all reading it at work. *NM*
05/09/2009 05:00:17 AM
- 355 Views
It isn't supposed to be.
05/09/2009 04:08:46 AM
- 799 Views
Re: This is not RJ's writing. (No Spoilers)
05/09/2009 04:13:48 AM
- 843 Views
Absolutely not.
05/09/2009 04:18:51 AM
- 1137 Views
Re: Absolutely not.
05/09/2009 04:25:16 AM
- 911 Views
That's what I meant by absolutely not.
05/09/2009 04:31:26 AM
- 839 Views
Could it be rough draft that Sanderson kept, and Jordan never polished? *NM*
05/09/2009 05:14:59 AM
- 404 Views
I doubt it
05/09/2009 05:17:09 AM
- 939 Views
Yeah, I just finished reading it....and it was pretty obvious that it wasn't RJ
05/09/2009 04:55:30 AM
- 717 Views
Re: Yeah, I just finished reading it....and it was pretty obvious that it wasn't RJ
05/09/2009 07:41:51 AM
- 607 Views
Becareful of what you wish for
05/09/2009 08:29:52 AM
- 745 Views
I've been saying that for years.
05/09/2009 08:55:19 AM
- 803 Views
Whatever. I thought it was an improvement.
05/09/2009 08:45:37 PM
- 720 Views
Agree fully. Art and paiting have rarely even been mentioned! It feels like a fan's writing...
05/09/2009 09:59:15 AM
- 821 Views
Are you pre-ordering the book?
05/09/2009 10:48:44 AM
- 713 Views
No. It was never meant to be, it never could be and Sanderson never pretended otherwise.
05/09/2009 07:40:37 PM
- 846 Views
It sounds more like Anderson than Jordan
05/09/2009 11:11:58 PM
- 918 Views
Re: It sounds more like Anderson than Jordan
06/09/2009 12:19:11 AM
- 904 Views
It isn't but I thought BS said he wasn't trying to be exactly like RJ
08/09/2009 08:12:24 PM
- 714 Views