Active Users:428 Time:04/04/2025 08:38:22 AM
Re: Sammael? Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 29/04/2010 06:47:05 PM
That wasn't "her plan" - she was ordered to capture Rand and not to harm him.


Fair enough, if she didn't actually have much good choices in order to capture Rand, but it was clear that this plan was bound to fail. Even if she hadn't been revealed, Rand had an army nearby, some of them bonded to members of Rand's group who could have reinforced him instantly. There was no way Semirhage was going to succeed.

As for her "stupidity" to torture Rand when she had the chance and despite orders, that's not really stupidity nor incompetence. She's a psychopath and a sadist who on top of it had been seriously humiliated by Rand's people - not a good cocktail. It's Shaidar Haran who underestimated Semirhage's pulsions and overestimated her reliability in such a situation. Any psychiatrist could have told SH Semirhage couldn't be trusted to handle this mission and he better keep an eye on it (which actually, it appears he did. Rand didn't get sudden access to the TP by sheer luck)


I actually think that Shai'tan intended to sacrifice Semirhage there. But what you're saying doesn't make Semirhage's actions more competent, it just means that they were true to her character.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
Alll the incompetent Forsaken talk lately... - 29/04/2010 07:09:22 AM 1649 Views
Sammael? - 29/04/2010 08:07:24 AM 873 Views
Re: Sammael? - 29/04/2010 01:44:35 PM 695 Views
Re: Sammael? - 29/04/2010 02:50:07 PM 706 Views
Re: Sammael? - 29/04/2010 04:27:54 PM 777 Views
Re: Sammael? - 29/04/2010 05:35:03 PM 775 Views
Re: Sammael? - 29/04/2010 06:47:05 PM 611 Views
Sincerest apologies, the post should've been a reply... - 29/04/2010 06:52:23 PM 681 Views
Don't sweat it. It's not like we're overflowing with threads and need to cut down on the clutter. *NM* - 30/04/2010 01:52:37 AM 319 Views
Thanks for the support! =) *NM* - 01/05/2010 03:01:25 AM 283 Views
Nope, they deserve their bad rap for being Typical Villains of the Week including Gimmicks - 29/04/2010 02:48:47 PM 673 Views
I agree - 29/04/2010 02:56:55 PM 636 Views
Jordan didn't care in a 4 book series! - 29/04/2010 07:24:24 PM 749 Views
Name one bit of good nature to any of the AoL lives of the Forsaken. - 30/04/2010 01:49:53 AM 642 Views
What about Demandred? - 30/04/2010 05:12:55 AM 761 Views
D'oh! How come I didn't immediately think of a politician? Seriously? - 30/04/2010 12:45:35 PM 803 Views
What is your argument? - 30/04/2010 06:12:24 PM 663 Views
Indeed - 01/05/2010 09:35:06 AM 697 Views
Except LTT DID do good. You know, saving the world from the Dark One and all. He was good. QED - 01/05/2010 05:06:31 PM 634 Views
and Demandred fought the Shadow for half the war... what's the point? - 01/05/2010 09:20:00 PM 697 Views
You can do good without being good. It's mostly the system's fault (credit? ) - 01/05/2010 11:30:16 PM 663 Views
How do you judge people, if not by their actions? - 02/05/2010 06:29:16 AM 700 Views
Hair, taste in clothes, and sense of humor. Faile wins! *NM* - 02/05/2010 06:38:08 AM 291 Views
Faile has bad hair *NM* - 03/05/2010 05:06:23 AM 286 Views
To some extent, there was no evil since they lived in Utopia, - 30/04/2010 07:08:32 AM 698 Views
The WoT does NOT feature a "small set of characters" - 03/05/2010 12:06:56 AM 604 Views
I kinda thought most of those points were in what I already wrote - 03/05/2010 02:53:04 AM 583 Views
Re: Alll the incompetent Forsaken talk lately... - 30/04/2010 02:44:06 AM 632 Views
I agree with a few of your points - 30/04/2010 07:24:59 AM 684 Views
Re: I agree with a few of your points - 01/05/2010 01:13:03 AM 977 Views
someone recently posted audio to the Budapest? signing RJ did - 01/05/2010 03:00:56 AM 613 Views

Reply to Message