Active Users:495 Time:05/10/2024 09:51:48 AM
There's some before-during-and after info too... FanEditor10 Send a noteboard - 27/04/2010 07:24:08 PM
I have thought this for a while now. It never made sense to me that they would put a buffer in sa'angreal against the taint when there was no taint at that time. It make more sense if they were trying to buffer the use of the TP through sa'angreal.


The buffers in the sa'angreal are mostly buffers against drawing too much power. However, angreal made after the Breaking might have contained buffers against the taint. Maybe. Callandor was made DURING the breaking under special circumstances by the Aes Sedai who foretold the Dragon's rebirth. It would be safe to assume that THESE Aes Sedai, unlike the "modern day" useless ones, actually knew what they were doing and designed it to a specific purpose that only they know and we must wait and see.

Plus, the Aes Sedai of the AoL didn't know about the true power until Mierin (Lanfear) detected it, realized men and women could both use it, and tried to tap into it effectively boring into the Dark One's prison. Any angreal made before that could NOT have a buffer against the true power in it unless it was a complete fluke. But, any angreal made after the bore was made probably has either a buffer against it OR a means of using it more easily (Callandor?)

Interesting theories.
This message last edited by FanEditor10 on 28/04/2010 at 07:03:11 AM
Reply to message
Three will be one - 09/11/2009 04:05:13 PM 2476 Views
So, you think that Callandor is (also) a True Power sa'angreal? - 09/11/2009 04:28:44 PM 808 Views
Oh.. Yes, that makes sense - 09/11/2009 04:35:48 PM 665 Views
I like the Callandor might aid in the channeling of TP aspect. *NM* - 09/11/2009 05:03:26 PM 308 Views
Except HE can't do squat with Callandor - a woman has to do it, and her strength is unhelped *NM* - 09/11/2009 05:13:20 PM 476 Views
Re: Except HE can't do squat with Callandor - a woman has to do it, and her strength is unhelped - 10/11/2009 02:33:20 AM 680 Views
Yes *NM* - 10/11/2009 07:27:28 AM 288 Views
"Merely" guiding the flows IS doing the channeling! - 11/11/2009 12:39:03 AM 648 Views
Re: "Merely" guiding the flows IS doing the channeling! - 14/12/2009 01:43:09 AM 586 Views
Re: "Merely" guiding the flows IS doing the channeling! - 23/12/2009 05:12:49 PM 520 Views
Well, the way Sidious has this theory written - 13/12/2009 11:33:58 PM 584 Views
Re: Three will be one - 09/11/2009 05:55:31 PM 713 Views
Re: Three will be one - 10/11/2009 02:32:08 PM 772 Views
Re: Three will be one - 22/04/2010 07:59:43 PM 570 Views
There's some before-during-and after info too... - 27/04/2010 07:24:08 PM 606 Views

Reply to Message