Active Users:346 Time:13/04/2025 11:03:09 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Not sure what your point/question is. Doesn't seem like an issue to me quite frankly . RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 26/04/2010 04:45:21 PM
I don't think it's such a complicated issue - in this universe the "beginning" is not tied into human conceptions and experiences of time, so having accepted this, I don't think demanding to know what the "First" age would have consisted of. Perhaps if such an Age exists it would have actually been defined as the time when the Creator and the Dark One became two being of opposite polarities and have nothing to do with humans or history, at all.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
This message last edited by RugbyPlayingAshaman on 26/04/2010 at 04:47:51 PM
Reply to message
thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... mazza3 - 21/04/2010 10:32:38 PM 1350 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... GateKeeper - 22/04/2010 12:54:27 AM 955 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... Kieran - 22/04/2010 07:06:52 AM 728 Views
I don't know that there could really be a first or last Age... Fanatic-Templar - 22/04/2010 07:48:11 AM 841 Views
Yeah, it's the "third age"... DomA - 22/04/2010 02:13:56 PM 807 Views
Difficult to see how you can refer to a billion people as a "fringe"... *NM* Shannow - 22/04/2010 05:02:08 PM 362 Views
You really think half of all christians believe that Earth is only 3000 years old? *NM* Japhy - 23/04/2010 12:35:01 AM 369 Views
Last I've heard, the majority of Christians weren't fundamentalists DomA - 23/04/2010 01:54:04 PM 713 Views
How about "living on the fringe of reality"? *NM* Marshall - 24/04/2010 10:21:17 PM 362 Views
That's not entirely right Etzel - 22/04/2010 03:54:23 PM 768 Views
I think FT is saying that human conceptions of time don't apply to eternity. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 22/04/2010 04:14:45 PM 700 Views
However, I think RJ definitely had an idea, what each Age of the 7 Ages is supposed to be. *NM* Etzel - 22/04/2010 09:53:20 PM 338 Views
I don't think so. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 22/04/2010 09:57:43 PM 675 Views
No, the point is... Etzel - 23/04/2010 10:06:03 AM 727 Views
Not sure what your point/question is. Doesn't seem like an issue to me quite frankly . RugbyPlayingAshaman - 26/04/2010 04:45:21 PM 758 Views
The question is... Etzel - 26/04/2010 05:08:48 PM 686 Views
I agree with FT RugbyPlayingAshaman - 26/04/2010 06:28:29 PM 851 Views
Well, maybe. Fanatic-Templar - 22/04/2010 06:32:05 PM 729 Views
Doesn't make sense Etzel - 22/04/2010 09:51:55 PM 672 Views
Why? Fanatic-Templar - 22/04/2010 11:16:21 PM 713 Views
Ok File Leader - 23/04/2010 12:15:03 AM 704 Views
The question isn't if it would be possible for the Creator... Etzel - 23/04/2010 08:34:23 AM 696 Views
Yes, but as we also know from the cosmology of WoT... Fanatic-Templar - 23/04/2010 09:08:58 AM 756 Views
Yeah... Etzel - 23/04/2010 10:03:19 AM 705 Views
Why must there have been such a thing? Fanatic-Templar - 23/04/2010 07:30:02 PM 715 Views
So, you believe there never was a first 1st Age? *NM* Etzel - 24/04/2010 08:55:45 AM 365 Views
Yes and no... Fanatic-Templar - 24/04/2010 10:55:02 PM 676 Views
Don't think so, but might be an interesting question for BS! *NM* Etzel - 25/04/2010 09:38:09 AM 336 Views
True that. *NM* Fanatic-Templar - 25/04/2010 06:30:03 PM 393 Views
Yes there was a first age, no it is not a loop. Kieran - 23/04/2010 01:49:45 AM 748 Views
More change? Fanatic-Templar - 23/04/2010 05:03:22 AM 656 Views
Re: More change? Kieran - 24/04/2010 01:25:22 AM 685 Views
On the Ages... Etzel - 22/04/2010 02:16:38 PM 998 Views
Re: On the Ages... Kieran - 23/04/2010 01:54:16 AM 699 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... RugbyPlayingAshaman - 22/04/2010 03:09:32 PM 801 Views
Nah, it's just a Tolkien rip-off... ursidae - 22/04/2010 06:05:50 PM 1131 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... gjjfh - 23/04/2010 04:15:49 AM 725 Views
Can't be... Etzel - 23/04/2010 08:27:29 AM 721 Views
Yeah, but Loial apparently read a copy of The Lord of the Rings somewhere... Fanatic-Templar - 23/04/2010 09:11:00 AM 763 Views
It's reversed... Etzel - 23/04/2010 10:10:56 AM 836 Views
I doubt it, I don't have the books with me right now... Fanatic-Templar - 23/04/2010 07:31:34 PM 772 Views
I don't think that's right. *NM* Etzel - 24/04/2010 08:57:45 AM 725 Views
You're right, that is not referenced in the book. Fanatic-Templar - 25/04/2010 06:34:29 PM 674 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes