Active Users:1283 Time:23/11/2024 06:45:11 AM
I don't think that's right. *NM* Etzel Send a noteboard - 24/04/2010 08:57:45 AM
... what with the 'Master Underhill' joke. That a copy survived two to three Ages is unbelievable enough :P.


Tolkien used the name "Master Underhill", because he knew the WoT myth. ;)


... but I'm pretty sure Loial specifically mentions using that name because it came from a book he read.
Reply to message
thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 21/04/2010 10:32:38 PM 1224 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 12:54:27 AM 871 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 07:06:52 AM 637 Views
I don't know that there could really be a first or last Age... - 22/04/2010 07:48:11 AM 745 Views
Yeah, it's the "third age"... - 22/04/2010 02:13:56 PM 718 Views
That's not entirely right - 22/04/2010 03:54:23 PM 674 Views
I think FT is saying that human conceptions of time don't apply to eternity. - 22/04/2010 04:14:45 PM 612 Views
However, I think RJ definitely had an idea, what each Age of the 7 Ages is supposed to be. *NM* - 22/04/2010 09:53:20 PM 309 Views
I don't think so. - 22/04/2010 09:57:43 PM 589 Views
No, the point is... - 23/04/2010 10:06:03 AM 666 Views
Not sure what your point/question is. Doesn't seem like an issue to me quite frankly . - 26/04/2010 04:45:21 PM 666 Views
The question is... - 26/04/2010 05:08:48 PM 593 Views
I agree with FT - 26/04/2010 06:28:29 PM 755 Views
Well, maybe. - 22/04/2010 06:32:05 PM 641 Views
Doesn't make sense - 22/04/2010 09:51:55 PM 580 Views
Why? - 22/04/2010 11:16:21 PM 609 Views
Ok - 23/04/2010 12:15:03 AM 606 Views
The question isn't if it would be possible for the Creator... - 23/04/2010 08:34:23 AM 606 Views
Yes, but as we also know from the cosmology of WoT... - 23/04/2010 09:08:58 AM 657 Views
Yeah... - 23/04/2010 10:03:19 AM 616 Views
Why must there have been such a thing? - 23/04/2010 07:30:02 PM 618 Views
So, you believe there never was a first 1st Age? *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:55:45 AM 329 Views
Yes and no... - 24/04/2010 10:55:02 PM 586 Views
Don't think so, but might be an interesting question for BS! *NM* - 25/04/2010 09:38:09 AM 298 Views
True that. *NM* - 25/04/2010 06:30:03 PM 358 Views
Yes there was a first age, no it is not a loop. - 23/04/2010 01:49:45 AM 664 Views
More change? - 23/04/2010 05:03:22 AM 568 Views
Re: More change? - 24/04/2010 01:25:22 AM 600 Views
On the Ages... - 22/04/2010 02:16:38 PM 896 Views
Re: On the Ages... - 23/04/2010 01:54:16 AM 613 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 03:09:32 PM 721 Views
Nah, it's just a Tolkien rip-off... - 22/04/2010 06:05:50 PM 1042 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 23/04/2010 04:15:49 AM 663 Views
Can't be... - 23/04/2010 08:27:29 AM 632 Views
Yeah, but Loial apparently read a copy of The Lord of the Rings somewhere... - 23/04/2010 09:11:00 AM 672 Views
It's reversed... - 23/04/2010 10:10:56 AM 735 Views
I doubt it, I don't have the books with me right now... - 23/04/2010 07:31:34 PM 681 Views
I don't think that's right. *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:57:45 AM 639 Views
You're right, that is not referenced in the book. - 25/04/2010 06:34:29 PM 584 Views

Reply to Message