Active Users:386 Time:02/07/2025 03:44:54 AM
Re: More change? Kieran Send a noteboard - 24/04/2010 01:25:22 AM
From what? To what?

I thought it simply meant every turning was unique, not that it was consistently heading towards or away from something?


I'll try to find the quote. It basically says that each turning can have a little more flexibility to how things happen.
Reply to message
thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 21/04/2010 10:32:38 PM 1385 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 12:54:27 AM 994 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 07:06:52 AM 761 Views
I don't know that there could really be a first or last Age... - 22/04/2010 07:48:11 AM 872 Views
Yeah, it's the "third age"... - 22/04/2010 02:13:56 PM 836 Views
That's not entirely right - 22/04/2010 03:54:23 PM 803 Views
I think FT is saying that human conceptions of time don't apply to eternity. - 22/04/2010 04:14:45 PM 733 Views
However, I think RJ definitely had an idea, what each Age of the 7 Ages is supposed to be. *NM* - 22/04/2010 09:53:20 PM 351 Views
I don't think so. - 22/04/2010 09:57:43 PM 708 Views
No, the point is... - 23/04/2010 10:06:03 AM 759 Views
Not sure what your point/question is. Doesn't seem like an issue to me quite frankly . - 26/04/2010 04:45:21 PM 789 Views
The question is... - 26/04/2010 05:08:48 PM 713 Views
I agree with FT - 26/04/2010 06:28:29 PM 881 Views
Well, maybe. - 22/04/2010 06:32:05 PM 764 Views
Doesn't make sense - 22/04/2010 09:51:55 PM 706 Views
Why? - 22/04/2010 11:16:21 PM 745 Views
Ok - 23/04/2010 12:15:03 AM 737 Views
The question isn't if it would be possible for the Creator... - 23/04/2010 08:34:23 AM 729 Views
Yes, but as we also know from the cosmology of WoT... - 23/04/2010 09:08:58 AM 798 Views
Yeah... - 23/04/2010 10:03:19 AM 739 Views
Why must there have been such a thing? - 23/04/2010 07:30:02 PM 752 Views
So, you believe there never was a first 1st Age? *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:55:45 AM 379 Views
Yes and no... - 24/04/2010 10:55:02 PM 706 Views
Don't think so, but might be an interesting question for BS! *NM* - 25/04/2010 09:38:09 AM 353 Views
True that. *NM* - 25/04/2010 06:30:03 PM 405 Views
Yes there was a first age, no it is not a loop. - 23/04/2010 01:49:45 AM 781 Views
More change? - 23/04/2010 05:03:22 AM 691 Views
Re: More change? - 24/04/2010 01:25:22 AM 720 Views
On the Ages... - 22/04/2010 02:16:38 PM 1035 Views
Re: On the Ages... - 23/04/2010 01:54:16 AM 733 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 03:09:32 PM 837 Views
Nah, it's just a Tolkien rip-off... - 22/04/2010 06:05:50 PM 1170 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 23/04/2010 04:15:49 AM 757 Views
Can't be... - 23/04/2010 08:27:29 AM 753 Views
Yeah, but Loial apparently read a copy of The Lord of the Rings somewhere... - 23/04/2010 09:11:00 AM 797 Views
It's reversed... - 23/04/2010 10:10:56 AM 869 Views
I doubt it, I don't have the books with me right now... - 23/04/2010 07:31:34 PM 828 Views
I don't think that's right. *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:57:45 AM 755 Views
You're right, that is not referenced in the book. - 25/04/2010 06:34:29 PM 703 Views

Reply to Message