Active Users:544 Time:26/11/2024 10:57:50 PM
Re: More change? Kieran Send a noteboard - 24/04/2010 01:25:22 AM
From what? To what?

I thought it simply meant every turning was unique, not that it was consistently heading towards or away from something?


I'll try to find the quote. It basically says that each turning can have a little more flexibility to how things happen.
Reply to message
thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 21/04/2010 10:32:38 PM 1226 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 12:54:27 AM 875 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 07:06:52 AM 640 Views
I don't know that there could really be a first or last Age... - 22/04/2010 07:48:11 AM 748 Views
Yeah, it's the "third age"... - 22/04/2010 02:13:56 PM 721 Views
That's not entirely right - 22/04/2010 03:54:23 PM 676 Views
I think FT is saying that human conceptions of time don't apply to eternity. - 22/04/2010 04:14:45 PM 614 Views
However, I think RJ definitely had an idea, what each Age of the 7 Ages is supposed to be. *NM* - 22/04/2010 09:53:20 PM 309 Views
I don't think so. - 22/04/2010 09:57:43 PM 591 Views
No, the point is... - 23/04/2010 10:06:03 AM 668 Views
Not sure what your point/question is. Doesn't seem like an issue to me quite frankly . - 26/04/2010 04:45:21 PM 668 Views
The question is... - 26/04/2010 05:08:48 PM 597 Views
I agree with FT - 26/04/2010 06:28:29 PM 758 Views
Well, maybe. - 22/04/2010 06:32:05 PM 642 Views
Doesn't make sense - 22/04/2010 09:51:55 PM 582 Views
Why? - 22/04/2010 11:16:21 PM 611 Views
Ok - 23/04/2010 12:15:03 AM 606 Views
The question isn't if it would be possible for the Creator... - 23/04/2010 08:34:23 AM 609 Views
Yes, but as we also know from the cosmology of WoT... - 23/04/2010 09:08:58 AM 661 Views
Yeah... - 23/04/2010 10:03:19 AM 620 Views
Why must there have been such a thing? - 23/04/2010 07:30:02 PM 620 Views
So, you believe there never was a first 1st Age? *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:55:45 AM 329 Views
Yes and no... - 24/04/2010 10:55:02 PM 587 Views
Don't think so, but might be an interesting question for BS! *NM* - 25/04/2010 09:38:09 AM 299 Views
True that. *NM* - 25/04/2010 06:30:03 PM 358 Views
Yes there was a first age, no it is not a loop. - 23/04/2010 01:49:45 AM 665 Views
More change? - 23/04/2010 05:03:22 AM 569 Views
Re: More change? - 24/04/2010 01:25:22 AM 602 Views
On the Ages... - 22/04/2010 02:16:38 PM 899 Views
Re: On the Ages... - 23/04/2010 01:54:16 AM 615 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 03:09:32 PM 726 Views
Nah, it's just a Tolkien rip-off... - 22/04/2010 06:05:50 PM 1044 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 23/04/2010 04:15:49 AM 665 Views
Can't be... - 23/04/2010 08:27:29 AM 635 Views
Yeah, but Loial apparently read a copy of The Lord of the Rings somewhere... - 23/04/2010 09:11:00 AM 676 Views
It's reversed... - 23/04/2010 10:10:56 AM 740 Views
I doubt it, I don't have the books with me right now... - 23/04/2010 07:31:34 PM 682 Views
I don't think that's right. *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:57:45 AM 642 Views
You're right, that is not referenced in the book. - 25/04/2010 06:34:29 PM 586 Views

Reply to Message