Active Users:1256 Time:23/11/2024 06:54:27 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Why must there have been such a thing? Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 23/04/2010 07:30:02 PM
If there are no beginnings to the turning of the Wheel, then there can't have been a first cycle, that would be exactly that.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
This message last edited by Fanatic-Templar on 23/04/2010 at 07:30:40 PM
Reply to message
thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... mazza3 - 21/04/2010 10:32:38 PM 1224 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... GateKeeper - 22/04/2010 12:54:27 AM 871 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... Kieran - 22/04/2010 07:06:52 AM 637 Views
I don't know that there could really be a first or last Age... Fanatic-Templar - 22/04/2010 07:48:11 AM 746 Views
Yeah, it's the "third age"... DomA - 22/04/2010 02:13:56 PM 719 Views
Difficult to see how you can refer to a billion people as a "fringe"... *NM* Shannow - 22/04/2010 05:02:08 PM 324 Views
You really think half of all christians believe that Earth is only 3000 years old? *NM* Japhy - 23/04/2010 12:35:01 AM 330 Views
Last I've heard, the majority of Christians weren't fundamentalists DomA - 23/04/2010 01:54:04 PM 628 Views
How about "living on the fringe of reality"? *NM* Marshall - 24/04/2010 10:21:17 PM 327 Views
That's not entirely right Etzel - 22/04/2010 03:54:23 PM 674 Views
I think FT is saying that human conceptions of time don't apply to eternity. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 22/04/2010 04:14:45 PM 612 Views
However, I think RJ definitely had an idea, what each Age of the 7 Ages is supposed to be. *NM* Etzel - 22/04/2010 09:53:20 PM 309 Views
I don't think so. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 22/04/2010 09:57:43 PM 590 Views
No, the point is... Etzel - 23/04/2010 10:06:03 AM 666 Views
Not sure what your point/question is. Doesn't seem like an issue to me quite frankly . RugbyPlayingAshaman - 26/04/2010 04:45:21 PM 668 Views
The question is... Etzel - 26/04/2010 05:08:48 PM 595 Views
I agree with FT RugbyPlayingAshaman - 26/04/2010 06:28:29 PM 755 Views
Well, maybe. Fanatic-Templar - 22/04/2010 06:32:05 PM 642 Views
Doesn't make sense Etzel - 22/04/2010 09:51:55 PM 580 Views
Why? Fanatic-Templar - 22/04/2010 11:16:21 PM 609 Views
Ok File Leader - 23/04/2010 12:15:03 AM 606 Views
The question isn't if it would be possible for the Creator... Etzel - 23/04/2010 08:34:23 AM 606 Views
Yes, but as we also know from the cosmology of WoT... Fanatic-Templar - 23/04/2010 09:08:58 AM 657 Views
Yeah... Etzel - 23/04/2010 10:03:19 AM 616 Views
Why must there have been such a thing? Fanatic-Templar - 23/04/2010 07:30:02 PM 619 Views
So, you believe there never was a first 1st Age? *NM* Etzel - 24/04/2010 08:55:45 AM 329 Views
Yes and no... Fanatic-Templar - 24/04/2010 10:55:02 PM 587 Views
Don't think so, but might be an interesting question for BS! *NM* Etzel - 25/04/2010 09:38:09 AM 298 Views
True that. *NM* Fanatic-Templar - 25/04/2010 06:30:03 PM 358 Views
Yes there was a first age, no it is not a loop. Kieran - 23/04/2010 01:49:45 AM 664 Views
More change? Fanatic-Templar - 23/04/2010 05:03:22 AM 568 Views
Re: More change? Kieran - 24/04/2010 01:25:22 AM 600 Views
On the Ages... Etzel - 22/04/2010 02:16:38 PM 896 Views
Re: On the Ages... Kieran - 23/04/2010 01:54:16 AM 613 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... RugbyPlayingAshaman - 22/04/2010 03:09:32 PM 721 Views
Nah, it's just a Tolkien rip-off... ursidae - 22/04/2010 06:05:50 PM 1044 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... gjjfh - 23/04/2010 04:15:49 AM 664 Views
Can't be... Etzel - 23/04/2010 08:27:29 AM 633 Views
Yeah, but Loial apparently read a copy of The Lord of the Rings somewhere... Fanatic-Templar - 23/04/2010 09:11:00 AM 673 Views
It's reversed... Etzel - 23/04/2010 10:10:56 AM 735 Views
I doubt it, I don't have the books with me right now... Fanatic-Templar - 23/04/2010 07:31:34 PM 681 Views
I don't think that's right. *NM* Etzel - 24/04/2010 08:57:45 AM 640 Views
You're right, that is not referenced in the book. Fanatic-Templar - 25/04/2010 06:34:29 PM 584 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes