Active Users:481 Time:05/11/2024 04:05:43 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Can't be... Etzel Send a noteboard - 23/04/2010 08:27:29 AM
Actually, I'm pretty sure the "First age" refers to the current era in real life based on the stories that have been supposedly passed down from the First Age (Mosk and Merk, Queen Elsbet, Anla the Wise Counselor)

Source: http://www.sevenspokes.com/chronology/1st.html


Because according to RJ, our "myths" like King Arthur or the stories from the bible are basically the plot of the story in the books.
Reply to message
thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... mazza3 - 21/04/2010 10:32:38 PM 1220 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... GateKeeper - 22/04/2010 12:54:27 AM 865 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... Kieran - 22/04/2010 07:06:52 AM 631 Views
I don't know that there could really be a first or last Age... Fanatic-Templar - 22/04/2010 07:48:11 AM 740 Views
Yeah, it's the "third age"... DomA - 22/04/2010 02:13:56 PM 707 Views
Difficult to see how you can refer to a billion people as a "fringe"... *NM* Shannow - 22/04/2010 05:02:08 PM 321 Views
You really think half of all christians believe that Earth is only 3000 years old? *NM* Japhy - 23/04/2010 12:35:01 AM 327 Views
Last I've heard, the majority of Christians weren't fundamentalists DomA - 23/04/2010 01:54:04 PM 620 Views
How about "living on the fringe of reality"? *NM* Marshall - 24/04/2010 10:21:17 PM 324 Views
That's not entirely right Etzel - 22/04/2010 03:54:23 PM 668 Views
I think FT is saying that human conceptions of time don't apply to eternity. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 22/04/2010 04:14:45 PM 605 Views
However, I think RJ definitely had an idea, what each Age of the 7 Ages is supposed to be. *NM* Etzel - 22/04/2010 09:53:20 PM 306 Views
I don't think so. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 22/04/2010 09:57:43 PM 581 Views
No, the point is... Etzel - 23/04/2010 10:06:03 AM 657 Views
Not sure what your point/question is. Doesn't seem like an issue to me quite frankly . RugbyPlayingAshaman - 26/04/2010 04:45:21 PM 655 Views
The question is... Etzel - 26/04/2010 05:08:48 PM 583 Views
I agree with FT RugbyPlayingAshaman - 26/04/2010 06:28:29 PM 747 Views
Well, maybe. Fanatic-Templar - 22/04/2010 06:32:05 PM 633 Views
Doesn't make sense Etzel - 22/04/2010 09:51:55 PM 576 Views
Why? Fanatic-Templar - 22/04/2010 11:16:21 PM 605 Views
Ok File Leader - 23/04/2010 12:15:03 AM 597 Views
The question isn't if it would be possible for the Creator... Etzel - 23/04/2010 08:34:23 AM 599 Views
Yes, but as we also know from the cosmology of WoT... Fanatic-Templar - 23/04/2010 09:08:58 AM 652 Views
Yeah... Etzel - 23/04/2010 10:03:19 AM 608 Views
Why must there have been such a thing? Fanatic-Templar - 23/04/2010 07:30:02 PM 611 Views
So, you believe there never was a first 1st Age? *NM* Etzel - 24/04/2010 08:55:45 AM 326 Views
Yes and no... Fanatic-Templar - 24/04/2010 10:55:02 PM 581 Views
Don't think so, but might be an interesting question for BS! *NM* Etzel - 25/04/2010 09:38:09 AM 296 Views
True that. *NM* Fanatic-Templar - 25/04/2010 06:30:03 PM 355 Views
Yes there was a first age, no it is not a loop. Kieran - 23/04/2010 01:49:45 AM 656 Views
More change? Fanatic-Templar - 23/04/2010 05:03:22 AM 561 Views
Re: More change? Kieran - 24/04/2010 01:25:22 AM 596 Views
On the Ages... Etzel - 22/04/2010 02:16:38 PM 891 Views
Re: On the Ages... Kieran - 23/04/2010 01:54:16 AM 607 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... RugbyPlayingAshaman - 22/04/2010 03:09:32 PM 715 Views
Nah, it's just a Tolkien rip-off... ursidae - 22/04/2010 06:05:50 PM 1036 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... gjjfh - 23/04/2010 04:15:49 AM 659 Views
Can't be... Etzel - 23/04/2010 08:27:29 AM 629 Views
Yeah, but Loial apparently read a copy of The Lord of the Rings somewhere... Fanatic-Templar - 23/04/2010 09:11:00 AM 668 Views
It's reversed... Etzel - 23/04/2010 10:10:56 AM 729 Views
I doubt it, I don't have the books with me right now... Fanatic-Templar - 23/04/2010 07:31:34 PM 673 Views
I don't think that's right. *NM* Etzel - 24/04/2010 08:57:45 AM 632 Views
You're right, that is not referenced in the book. Fanatic-Templar - 25/04/2010 06:34:29 PM 579 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes