Active Users:351 Time:13/04/2025 10:50:26 PM
That's not entirely right Etzel Send a noteboard - 22/04/2010 03:54:23 PM
It's only logical that there actually must have been one very first Age, immediately after the Creator made the Wheel. Of course, after countless turnings of the Wheel, the names "first Age", "second Age" and so on lost their meaning a bit, since you could also call them the 1081. Age and the 1082. Age (or whatever would fit, if you count all Ages that ever occurred). However, since the particular Ages basically always have the same activity, it makes sense to name them always from 1st Age to 7th Age and not continuously increase the numbers in the names of the Ages or change the particular numbers of the Ages (at least from the PoV from an omniscient narrator).
This message last edited by Etzel on 22/04/2010 at 03:56:51 PM
Reply to message
thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 21/04/2010 10:32:38 PM 1349 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 12:54:27 AM 955 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 07:06:52 AM 727 Views
I don't know that there could really be a first or last Age... - 22/04/2010 07:48:11 AM 840 Views
Yeah, it's the "third age"... - 22/04/2010 02:13:56 PM 807 Views
That's not entirely right - 22/04/2010 03:54:23 PM 768 Views
I think FT is saying that human conceptions of time don't apply to eternity. - 22/04/2010 04:14:45 PM 700 Views
However, I think RJ definitely had an idea, what each Age of the 7 Ages is supposed to be. *NM* - 22/04/2010 09:53:20 PM 338 Views
I don't think so. - 22/04/2010 09:57:43 PM 675 Views
No, the point is... - 23/04/2010 10:06:03 AM 726 Views
Not sure what your point/question is. Doesn't seem like an issue to me quite frankly . - 26/04/2010 04:45:21 PM 757 Views
The question is... - 26/04/2010 05:08:48 PM 684 Views
I agree with FT - 26/04/2010 06:28:29 PM 851 Views
Well, maybe. - 22/04/2010 06:32:05 PM 729 Views
Doesn't make sense - 22/04/2010 09:51:55 PM 672 Views
Why? - 22/04/2010 11:16:21 PM 713 Views
Ok - 23/04/2010 12:15:03 AM 704 Views
The question isn't if it would be possible for the Creator... - 23/04/2010 08:34:23 AM 695 Views
Yes, but as we also know from the cosmology of WoT... - 23/04/2010 09:08:58 AM 755 Views
Yeah... - 23/04/2010 10:03:19 AM 704 Views
Why must there have been such a thing? - 23/04/2010 07:30:02 PM 715 Views
So, you believe there never was a first 1st Age? *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:55:45 AM 365 Views
Yes and no... - 24/04/2010 10:55:02 PM 675 Views
Don't think so, but might be an interesting question for BS! *NM* - 25/04/2010 09:38:09 AM 336 Views
True that. *NM* - 25/04/2010 06:30:03 PM 393 Views
Yes there was a first age, no it is not a loop. - 23/04/2010 01:49:45 AM 747 Views
More change? - 23/04/2010 05:03:22 AM 656 Views
Re: More change? - 24/04/2010 01:25:22 AM 685 Views
On the Ages... - 22/04/2010 02:16:38 PM 998 Views
Re: On the Ages... - 23/04/2010 01:54:16 AM 699 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 03:09:32 PM 801 Views
Nah, it's just a Tolkien rip-off... - 22/04/2010 06:05:50 PM 1131 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 23/04/2010 04:15:49 AM 724 Views
Can't be... - 23/04/2010 08:27:29 AM 721 Views
Yeah, but Loial apparently read a copy of The Lord of the Rings somewhere... - 23/04/2010 09:11:00 AM 763 Views
It's reversed... - 23/04/2010 10:10:56 AM 835 Views
I doubt it, I don't have the books with me right now... - 23/04/2010 07:31:34 PM 772 Views
I don't think that's right. *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:57:45 AM 724 Views
You're right, that is not referenced in the book. - 25/04/2010 06:34:29 PM 674 Views

Reply to Message