Active Users:444 Time:05/11/2024 03:49:52 PM
thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... mazza3 Send a noteboard - 21/04/2010 10:32:38 PM
obviously rj had a reason when he named present randland time as the third age - either he actually thought of it as the third age (making it so) or he just happened to like the number 3 and wanted to mess with us about what age it really was. i'm going to assume that this really is the third age from here on out...

the first age was presumably similar to current times without the threat of the d.o. and trollocs et al. people farmed, channelers existed and the whole world was on the brink (then, of greatness and creativity (A.o.L.), now, of disaster). these two ages (1st and 3rd) mirror each other reasonably well, but in order for humanity to be at it's current point and exist for another 12-15 thousand years only to get back to where it is now, some sort of catastrophe is going to have to happen. obviously, the last battle qualifies as an enormous catastrophe, but if the breaking of the world, which lasted a few hundred years, can be relatively forgotten in under 3000 years, then the last battle, which will presumably take place in under a year, has to either be so cataclysmic that one of the heroes will be lucky to be left standing (or that one breeding pair will be in the same general part of the world) or it will have to be disruptive in another way.

we don't have too much to go on about what the other options are, we know that at some point in the past, men ran with wolves, which invokes a caveman-esque image. from this one point we can infer that humans may lose their humanity, i.e. rand's last action after sealing up the d.o. would be to erase conscious thought from all humans. i find it unlikely that if a significant number of people survive the last battle that they'll go along building, farming, reproducing as they had before, and that it would take them 12,000 years to reach the age of legends glory. something disruptive will have to occur that dials humans' conscious advancement back a few hundred centuries.

we also have the aiel's 'a remnant of a remnant shall he save' prophesy. the current aiel are the first part of the remnant (as they are remnants of the A.o.L. aiel), but some of them will have to be saved as well. but for what purpose? what purpose will saving any aiel serve?

also, we know that the d.o. is completely sealed by the 2nd age. 12,000 seems like a reasonable amount of time to forget the great overlord, but since the printing press currently exists, i doubt that he/it would have been forgotten. we can still cite things that happened china before 2000 bce and i doubt that if the great evil had be sealed away then that we wouldn't still know about it now. and they didn't even have the help of the printing press to keep the story alive (yes i know there is a 10,000 year gap here, but since we haven't been organized into societies for that long....just let it be).

anyway, i'll try to wrap this up. points:

- a lot of time has to pass before humanity comes back to pretty much where it is today, meaning that something extremely disruptive needs to happen.

- disruptive can mean many things (or many combinations of thing): plague, mass chaos/near extinction of humans, mass loss of memory/conscious thought, etc.

- a catastrophic war, unless it destroys everything except for a few hundred breeding pairs of humans, would not be enough to set humankind back 12,000 years (but a remnant, of at least the aiel, will be saved).

- radical solution: humans lose their intelligent thought function and slowly begin to revert back to primal man....

what do youse all think about the state of the world post-TG?

i am not sure if this will generate any discussion, but i felt like posting something and i actually did for once. cheers and big ears y'all.
Reply to message
thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 21/04/2010 10:32:38 PM 1219 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 12:54:27 AM 865 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 07:06:52 AM 631 Views
I don't know that there could really be a first or last Age... - 22/04/2010 07:48:11 AM 739 Views
Yeah, it's the "third age"... - 22/04/2010 02:13:56 PM 706 Views
That's not entirely right - 22/04/2010 03:54:23 PM 667 Views
I think FT is saying that human conceptions of time don't apply to eternity. - 22/04/2010 04:14:45 PM 604 Views
However, I think RJ definitely had an idea, what each Age of the 7 Ages is supposed to be. *NM* - 22/04/2010 09:53:20 PM 306 Views
I don't think so. - 22/04/2010 09:57:43 PM 580 Views
No, the point is... - 23/04/2010 10:06:03 AM 657 Views
Not sure what your point/question is. Doesn't seem like an issue to me quite frankly . - 26/04/2010 04:45:21 PM 653 Views
The question is... - 26/04/2010 05:08:48 PM 582 Views
I agree with FT - 26/04/2010 06:28:29 PM 747 Views
Well, maybe. - 22/04/2010 06:32:05 PM 633 Views
Doesn't make sense - 22/04/2010 09:51:55 PM 574 Views
Why? - 22/04/2010 11:16:21 PM 603 Views
Ok - 23/04/2010 12:15:03 AM 597 Views
The question isn't if it would be possible for the Creator... - 23/04/2010 08:34:23 AM 599 Views
Yes, but as we also know from the cosmology of WoT... - 23/04/2010 09:08:58 AM 652 Views
Yeah... - 23/04/2010 10:03:19 AM 608 Views
Why must there have been such a thing? - 23/04/2010 07:30:02 PM 610 Views
So, you believe there never was a first 1st Age? *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:55:45 AM 326 Views
Yes and no... - 24/04/2010 10:55:02 PM 579 Views
Don't think so, but might be an interesting question for BS! *NM* - 25/04/2010 09:38:09 AM 296 Views
True that. *NM* - 25/04/2010 06:30:03 PM 355 Views
Yes there was a first age, no it is not a loop. - 23/04/2010 01:49:45 AM 656 Views
More change? - 23/04/2010 05:03:22 AM 561 Views
Re: More change? - 24/04/2010 01:25:22 AM 594 Views
On the Ages... - 22/04/2010 02:16:38 PM 890 Views
Re: On the Ages... - 23/04/2010 01:54:16 AM 606 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 22/04/2010 03:09:32 PM 715 Views
Nah, it's just a Tolkien rip-off... - 22/04/2010 06:05:50 PM 1036 Views
Re: thinking on the 4th-7th and 1st ages.... - 23/04/2010 04:15:49 AM 657 Views
Can't be... - 23/04/2010 08:27:29 AM 627 Views
Yeah, but Loial apparently read a copy of The Lord of the Rings somewhere... - 23/04/2010 09:11:00 AM 667 Views
It's reversed... - 23/04/2010 10:10:56 AM 729 Views
I doubt it, I don't have the books with me right now... - 23/04/2010 07:31:34 PM 673 Views
I don't think that's right. *NM* - 24/04/2010 08:57:45 AM 632 Views
You're right, that is not referenced in the book. - 25/04/2010 06:34:29 PM 578 Views

Reply to Message