Active Users:1239 Time:23/11/2024 07:18:56 AM
I agree with Cannoli there ironclad Send a noteboard - 09/04/2010 04:23:18 PM
I think they will all come to the same conclusion - that this life (the sideways timeline) isn't 'right'. Even if some of them are already dead, it's still wrong; it's not how things are supposed to be.

I think the dead ones will come to realize 'Tis better to have loved and lost than never loved at all.


I didn't think about it like he did before his reply, but then I realized that he was right. I don't want the LA reality to get eliminated. Mostly for all the people who died in vain then. Plus it would make it all so futile, showing a reality for a whole season that just turns out to be a "What if" but then doesn't happen would be painful. Oh God, NOW I am worried about the ending of the show.
*MySmiley*

You mustn't be afraid to dream a little bigger, darling.
Reply to message
Lost 6.11: Happily Ever After *spoilers* - 07/04/2010 11:10:08 AM 787 Views
ah HA! - 07/04/2010 03:02:50 PM 528 Views
Is sideways-Desmond the "constant" for the other passengers? - 07/04/2010 03:46:57 PM 537 Views
Finally, an episode that made me think "Lost is back!" - 07/04/2010 05:29:03 PM 565 Views
Re: Lost 6.11: Happily Ever After *spoilers* - 07/04/2010 06:33:10 PM 547 Views
So why is Penny now sharing a name with the author of Paradise Lost? Foreshadowing or aftshadowing? - 07/04/2010 06:33:13 PM 544 Views
Re: So why is Penny now sharing a name with the author of Paradise Lost? - 09/04/2010 03:53:39 PM 498 Views
I agree with Cannoli there - 09/04/2010 04:23:18 PM 570 Views
Maybe the sideline is necessary, though. It's a loophole. - 09/04/2010 10:46:11 PM 593 Views
so is the show now called "Desmond Darko?" *NM* - 10/04/2010 08:10:05 AM 189 Views
no one has mentioned this on the blogs or podcasts... - 10/04/2010 08:06:15 AM 464 Views
Re: no one has mentioned this on the blogs or podcasts... - 10/04/2010 07:48:18 PM 471 Views

Reply to Message