Active Users:1195 Time:22/11/2024 07:34:27 PM
Re: You know... Brian Send a noteboard - 16/03/2010 03:15:55 PM
Planned obsolescence was the first issue I thought of. I don't remember if they specified if only certain replicants would die after 4(?) years, but how would a replicant rise to become one of the best blade runners in such a short amount of time? Does future LA not do background checks? I would think that they would do the test on anyone applying for such a position. Or, they knew all along he was a replicant and that's what they use as Blade Runners. Kind of conspiracy-theoryish, but that could explain it.

Deckard is also considerably weaker than the other replicants in the film. If he was a replicant, why was he so easily outmatched

The most common explanation is that Detective Gaff was the real Blade Runner, and fully aware that Deckard was a replicant. Instead of his job being to hunt them down, his job was to keep an eye on Deckard and make sure he didn't realize that he was a replicant and that he didn't go rogue as well.
Reply to message
Movie club March part 1: Blade Runner - 11/03/2010 09:11:13 AM 953 Views
I haven't gotten around to watching it yet... - 11/03/2010 11:00:40 PM 469 Views
Ohh I wished I'd seen it on the big screen! *NM* - 12/03/2010 08:26:36 AM 233 Views
I did, when it was first released. - 12/03/2010 07:16:13 PM 454 Views
This movie is a benchmark for me. - 15/03/2010 01:30:47 PM 527 Views
- 15/03/2010 01:42:14 PM 628 Views
Re: This movie is a benchmark for me. - 15/03/2010 05:28:22 PM 455 Views
Yeah. they laughed at The Exorcist too. - 15/03/2010 05:36:25 PM 511 Views
Looking back 1982 was a great year for movies. - 15/03/2010 05:56:54 PM 517 Views
Strangely, I think I've seen Grease 2 the most often out of those films. - 15/03/2010 06:13:37 PM 413 Views
Re: Movie club March part 1: Blade Runner - 15/03/2010 08:22:14 PM 462 Views
You know... - 15/03/2010 08:53:18 PM 517 Views
Re: You know... - 16/03/2010 12:52:55 PM 462 Views
Re: You know... - 16/03/2010 01:05:19 PM 480 Views
Re: You know... - 16/03/2010 01:40:29 PM 777 Views
Re: You know... - 16/03/2010 03:10:29 PM 659 Views
According to IMDB... - 25/03/2010 10:10:39 PM 444 Views
In the book he's not a replicant - 25/03/2010 10:20:44 PM 455 Views
Some Points - 16/03/2010 01:40:52 PM 658 Views
Re: You know... - 16/03/2010 03:15:55 PM 472 Views
I imagine your impressions will be common for first time viewers. *NM* - 15/03/2010 09:03:35 PM 225 Views
That doesn't bode well for the future of Blade Runner. - 16/03/2010 01:42:40 PM 405 Views
Re: That doesn't bode well for the future of Blade Runner. - 16/03/2010 03:04:27 PM 419 Views
This describes my first impression almost perfectly. - 18/03/2010 11:42:20 PM 408 Views
This is such a curious movie.... - 16/03/2010 05:46:18 AM 441 Views
It is. - 16/03/2010 08:57:18 AM 576 Views
Re: It is. - 16/03/2010 03:30:08 PM 454 Views
Re: It is. - 25/03/2010 10:22:34 PM 457 Views
I've never been able to finish this movie - 16/03/2010 09:05:01 PM 456 Views
I can see why you'd think that... - 25/03/2010 10:39:31 PM 411 Views
A gorgeous and immersive experience - 22/03/2010 12:57:10 AM 525 Views
Nicely said! - 22/03/2010 08:35:22 AM 594 Views
It's questionable how "Good" Roy is. - 22/03/2010 03:40:12 PM 398 Views
So now I saw it, finally. - 25/03/2010 09:50:23 PM 433 Views
now you should go read the book - 29/03/2010 06:06:53 PM 379 Views
It stinks!!! *NM* - 30/03/2010 07:09:39 AM 252 Views

Reply to Message