Active Users:1088 Time:22/11/2024 11:11:56 PM
Nope smaug Send a noteboard - 27/02/2010 03:33:45 PM
Who the EFF was that little kid that told UnLocke not to kill Sawyer? Did I miss something obvious?


It's not obvious who that is. Jacob in some other form? Aaron from the future? Something else entirely?
It reminded me of the Walt appearences in season 2 (were those all the MiB pushing Locke around? What about when Shannon got killed?)
Neutral Observer
Reply to message
Lost 6.5: The lighthouse *spoilers* - 24/02/2010 12:58:58 PM 748 Views
Great episode! - 24/02/2010 02:54:18 PM 413 Views
Re: Great episode! - 24/02/2010 03:45:55 PM 404 Views
Re: Lost 6.5: The lighthouse *spoilers* - 24/02/2010 03:59:28 PM 482 Views
This episode was very subtle.... - 24/02/2010 04:06:28 PM 470 Views
I checked for the tattoo - 24/02/2010 07:55:48 PM 393 Views
Re Kate and Aaron - 25/02/2010 09:58:33 AM 405 Views
So what's up with next week's episode? - 24/02/2010 05:00:45 PM 436 Views
You know I really love this show but... - 25/02/2010 12:20:36 AM 408 Views
That actually was kinda (unintentionally) funny. *NM* - 26/02/2010 05:58:03 PM 138 Views
I wouldn't call Claire the new Rousseau. They're actually opposite. - 25/02/2010 12:27:19 AM 473 Views
Agreed - 25/02/2010 03:16:11 AM 390 Views
Christian and Locke. - 25/02/2010 10:54:30 AM 352 Views
Re: Lost 6.5: The lighthouse *spoilers* - 25/02/2010 03:23:47 AM 407 Views
Re: Lost 6.5: The lighthouse *spoilers* - 25/02/2010 12:20:53 PM 436 Views
Kate Austen was on the lighthouse dial as number 51, not crossed off. - 25/02/2010 12:45:15 PM 382 Views
Other numbers: - 26/02/2010 11:49:33 PM 366 Views
Interesting that name 108 on the dial is Wallace. Possibly a shoutout to David Wallace? - 26/02/2010 12:22:26 AM 375 Views
Could be. Are the writers fans of The Office? - 26/02/2010 03:24:53 PM 371 Views
Without reading dial, I thought it might be Walt. - 04/03/2010 06:11:04 PM 363 Views
Haha, the funnyiest thing for me is... - 27/02/2010 01:53:06 PM 403 Views
A question not addressed.... - 27/02/2010 03:26:29 PM 438 Views
Nope - 27/02/2010 03:33:45 PM 439 Views

Reply to Message