Active Users:410 Time:04/04/2025 12:47:24 PM
Great episode! Sir Tybalt Send a noteboard - 24/02/2010 02:54:18 PM
I missed the first couple of seconds of the show, but they were showing us pictures of Jack - was there a woman in there somewhere? Possibly the mother of Jack's son?

Sounds like Jacob knew Jack would trash the lighthouse all along. He's just nudging Jack along the path he needs to take.

Soooo, what happens now when Kate finds Claire and tells her she had Aaron this whole time? So long, Kate?

Can't wait for next week's episode!
Reply to message
Lost 6.5: The lighthouse *spoilers* - 24/02/2010 12:58:58 PM 802 Views
Great episode! - 24/02/2010 02:54:18 PM 470 Views
Re: Great episode! - 24/02/2010 03:45:55 PM 456 Views
Re: Lost 6.5: The lighthouse *spoilers* - 24/02/2010 03:59:28 PM 540 Views
This episode was very subtle.... - 24/02/2010 04:06:28 PM 526 Views
I checked for the tattoo - 24/02/2010 07:55:48 PM 451 Views
Re Kate and Aaron - 25/02/2010 09:58:33 AM 460 Views
So what's up with next week's episode? - 24/02/2010 05:00:45 PM 500 Views
You know I really love this show but... - 25/02/2010 12:20:36 AM 471 Views
That actually was kinda (unintentionally) funny. *NM* - 26/02/2010 05:58:03 PM 167 Views
I wouldn't call Claire the new Rousseau. They're actually opposite. - 25/02/2010 12:27:19 AM 525 Views
Agreed - 25/02/2010 03:16:11 AM 447 Views
Christian and Locke. - 25/02/2010 10:54:30 AM 400 Views
Re: Lost 6.5: The lighthouse *spoilers* - 25/02/2010 03:23:47 AM 458 Views
Re: Lost 6.5: The lighthouse *spoilers* - 25/02/2010 12:20:53 PM 495 Views
Kate Austen was on the lighthouse dial as number 51, not crossed off. - 25/02/2010 12:45:15 PM 437 Views
Other numbers: - 26/02/2010 11:49:33 PM 428 Views
Interesting that name 108 on the dial is Wallace. Possibly a shoutout to David Wallace? - 26/02/2010 12:22:26 AM 439 Views
Could be. Are the writers fans of The Office? - 26/02/2010 03:24:53 PM 426 Views
Without reading dial, I thought it might be Walt. - 04/03/2010 06:11:04 PM 418 Views
Haha, the funnyiest thing for me is... - 27/02/2010 01:53:06 PM 454 Views
A question not addressed.... - 27/02/2010 03:26:29 PM 503 Views
Nope - 27/02/2010 03:33:45 PM 491 Views

Reply to Message