Active Users:1101 Time:22/11/2024 10:07:32 PM
Great episode! Sir Tybalt Send a noteboard - 24/02/2010 02:54:18 PM
I missed the first couple of seconds of the show, but they were showing us pictures of Jack - was there a woman in there somewhere? Possibly the mother of Jack's son?

Sounds like Jacob knew Jack would trash the lighthouse all along. He's just nudging Jack along the path he needs to take.

Soooo, what happens now when Kate finds Claire and tells her she had Aaron this whole time? So long, Kate?

Can't wait for next week's episode!
Reply to message
Lost 6.5: The lighthouse *spoilers* - 24/02/2010 12:58:58 PM 746 Views
Great episode! - 24/02/2010 02:54:18 PM 413 Views
Re: Great episode! - 24/02/2010 03:45:55 PM 404 Views
Re: Lost 6.5: The lighthouse *spoilers* - 24/02/2010 03:59:28 PM 480 Views
This episode was very subtle.... - 24/02/2010 04:06:28 PM 468 Views
I checked for the tattoo - 24/02/2010 07:55:48 PM 392 Views
Re Kate and Aaron - 25/02/2010 09:58:33 AM 403 Views
So what's up with next week's episode? - 24/02/2010 05:00:45 PM 435 Views
You know I really love this show but... - 25/02/2010 12:20:36 AM 406 Views
That actually was kinda (unintentionally) funny. *NM* - 26/02/2010 05:58:03 PM 138 Views
I wouldn't call Claire the new Rousseau. They're actually opposite. - 25/02/2010 12:27:19 AM 471 Views
Agreed - 25/02/2010 03:16:11 AM 388 Views
Christian and Locke. - 25/02/2010 10:54:30 AM 350 Views
Re: Lost 6.5: The lighthouse *spoilers* - 25/02/2010 03:23:47 AM 407 Views
Re: Lost 6.5: The lighthouse *spoilers* - 25/02/2010 12:20:53 PM 436 Views
Kate Austen was on the lighthouse dial as number 51, not crossed off. - 25/02/2010 12:45:15 PM 380 Views
Other numbers: - 26/02/2010 11:49:33 PM 364 Views
Interesting that name 108 on the dial is Wallace. Possibly a shoutout to David Wallace? - 26/02/2010 12:22:26 AM 373 Views
Could be. Are the writers fans of The Office? - 26/02/2010 03:24:53 PM 370 Views
Without reading dial, I thought it might be Walt. - 04/03/2010 06:11:04 PM 362 Views
Haha, the funnyiest thing for me is... - 27/02/2010 01:53:06 PM 403 Views
A question not addressed.... - 27/02/2010 03:26:29 PM 438 Views
Nope - 27/02/2010 03:33:45 PM 437 Views

Reply to Message