1. Disney owns Miramax. The pseudo-indie isn't what it was when the Weinsteins were introducing mainstream America to indie edge in the 90s, sure. But Disney has owned the studio even since those days-- Pulp Fiction was released by Miramax when it was owned by Disney, for Christ's sake. Clearly this is a studio unafraid of edge when cordoned off in the proper sector.
2. Disney owns Pixar. The animation geeks were freaking out when this merger happened in 2006. But you know what's happened since then? Ratatouille, Wall-E and Up, plus a ton of money to make more movies like that by selling Cars-themed bedspreads to 5-year-old boys. Instead of curbing John Lasseter's vision, they put him in charge of all animation. Clearly this is a studio unafraid of creative license.
3. Disney knows from marketing. I mean, duh. If you think Iron Man and Spider-Man action figures are ubiquitous now, just wait until they come under the watch of the people who have made sure that every girl under the age of 10 has a Hannah Montana-themed something. Just like it was for Pixar, this isn't inherently a bad thing. Kids need toys and kids love the characters and more toys mean more storytelling opportunities for just those characters. Clearly this is a studio unafraid to make a bunch of money on ancillary stuff and spend it perpetuating the cycle.
4. Disney really wants boys to pay attention. This may be the biggest reason of all to hold your horses. With the exception of Cars, Disney hasn't really been able to tap into a young boy market, and they really have no cachet among teens. There's no way they would scare off Marvel's core fanbase of teen boys by cleaning up Tony Stark or toning down the action in Spider-Man. Not that those two characters will be under Disney any time soon-- Paramount and Sony are still hanging on to their respective deals-- but I guarantee they'll be using that model going forward with whichever Marvel character is up at the plate next. Clearly this is a studio well aware that you, the fanboy, are their golden calf, and you will not be sacrificed.
5. Disney still has John Lasseter. This really just applies to the spectre of straight-to-DVD animated Iron Man adventures, in which Tony Stark fights Tinkerbell or some nonsense. As head of Disney Animation, Lasseter has done away with that crappy treatment of Disney's characters. While there will likely be a lot more Marvel character animation, apparently much of it on the Disney XD channel, don't expect it to be as miserable as the fates that befell The Little Mermaid and Jafar in the 90s. Clearly this is a studio with more respect for its characters than it used to have.
As I said above, I agree, actually.
2. Disney owns Pixar. The animation geeks were freaking out when this merger happened in 2006. But you know what's happened since then? Ratatouille, Wall-E and Up, plus a ton of money to make more movies like that by selling Cars-themed bedspreads to 5-year-old boys. Instead of curbing John Lasseter's vision, they put him in charge of all animation. Clearly this is a studio unafraid of creative license.
3. Disney knows from marketing. I mean, duh. If you think Iron Man and Spider-Man action figures are ubiquitous now, just wait until they come under the watch of the people who have made sure that every girl under the age of 10 has a Hannah Montana-themed something. Just like it was for Pixar, this isn't inherently a bad thing. Kids need toys and kids love the characters and more toys mean more storytelling opportunities for just those characters. Clearly this is a studio unafraid to make a bunch of money on ancillary stuff and spend it perpetuating the cycle.
4. Disney really wants boys to pay attention. This may be the biggest reason of all to hold your horses. With the exception of Cars, Disney hasn't really been able to tap into a young boy market, and they really have no cachet among teens. There's no way they would scare off Marvel's core fanbase of teen boys by cleaning up Tony Stark or toning down the action in Spider-Man. Not that those two characters will be under Disney any time soon-- Paramount and Sony are still hanging on to their respective deals-- but I guarantee they'll be using that model going forward with whichever Marvel character is up at the plate next. Clearly this is a studio well aware that you, the fanboy, are their golden calf, and you will not be sacrificed.
5. Disney still has John Lasseter. This really just applies to the spectre of straight-to-DVD animated Iron Man adventures, in which Tony Stark fights Tinkerbell or some nonsense. As head of Disney Animation, Lasseter has done away with that crappy treatment of Disney's characters. While there will likely be a lot more Marvel character animation, apparently much of it on the Disney XD channel, don't expect it to be as miserable as the fates that befell The Little Mermaid and Jafar in the 90s. Clearly this is a studio with more respect for its characters than it used to have.
As I said above, I agree, actually.
*MySmiley*
You mustn't be afraid to dream a little bigger, darling.
You mustn't be afraid to dream a little bigger, darling.
The World has come to an end! Disney is buying Marvel
31/08/2009 04:09:24 PM
- 966 Views
So what effect will this have on the movies Marvel Studios are making
31/08/2009 04:19:19 PM
- 556 Views
I don't think this bodes well for the future of Marvel
31/08/2009 04:34:17 PM
- 537 Views
I mean unless Disney is just making money off of them and just owns them
31/08/2009 04:38:17 PM
- 647 Views
Well Miramax did some pretty un-disney stuff in the ninties
31/08/2009 04:39:34 PM
- 629 Views
I think all Marvel Movies rights will have reverted to Marvel by 2011 or something like that
31/08/2009 04:46:01 PM
- 515 Views
Please list one thing Dinsey has "ruined" after purchasing it.
02/09/2009 04:13:50 AM
- 597 Views
That was just my gut reaction to it in all honesty....
02/09/2009 07:30:44 AM
- 497 Views
As long as the Disney brand name stays off the comics, idc. I'll stop my subscriptions otherwise. *NM*
31/08/2009 06:24:35 PM
- 335 Views
I doubt that they're going to have Hannah Montana star in the Wonder Woman movie or anything.
31/08/2009 06:47:40 PM
- 596 Views
Of course they wouldn't!
31/08/2009 06:54:37 PM
- 642 Views
She'd make a better Storm, honestly. *NM*
31/08/2009 07:13:05 PM
- 265 Views
Miramax is Disney. Pulp Fiction is Miramax. PF contained anal rape
31/08/2009 10:48:28 PM
- 678 Views
5 Reasons not to freak out about this
03/09/2009 01:11:22 PM
- 706 Views
You think it can get worse than Spider-Man 3?
07/09/2009 10:13:24 AM
- 607 Views
I liked Spider-Man 3. *NM*
07/09/2009 06:30:10 PM
- 307 Views