Active Users:1146 Time:23/11/2024 01:29:14 AM
300 is deliberately supposed to be non-historical, but this message got lost somewhere along the way Werthead Send a noteboard - 21/01/2010 01:47:50 AM
And it is pretty damn close to that.


From historical records, true or not true. I must concur with Ghavrel on all his points.


The story as presented in the film in purely fantastical embellishment created for propaganda and morale purposes, to beef up the Spartans for their later defeat of the Persians after Thermopylae. The objective of the story in the comic and film is to show the Battle of Thermopylae after the Spartan equivalent of Goebbels gets his hands on it and beefs it up with war-rhinos and ten-feet-tall Persian god-kings.

Admittedly this is not transmitted very clearly in the film (which should have suddenly cut at the end to a much more realistic-looking Greek army of heavily-armoured soldiers rather than warriors still protected by their battle-shorts). Zack Snyder is not good at doing 'subtle'.

As a retelling of the real story of the battle, it is entirely worthless. In fact, the film may have significantly damaged the chances of us seeing Steven Pressfield's much more historically accurate GATES OF FIRE ever being transferred to the screen, at least for a few more years until memories of 300 die away. However, 300 is so insanely over the top and divorced from reality, I thought it was pretty clear that this was not supposed to be a historically accurate retelling of the story. It's about one step away from expecting historical accuracy in the ASTERIX comic books.
This message last edited by Werthead on 21/01/2010 at 01:49:36 AM
Reply to message
Spartacus: Blood and Sand starts this week...on Starz...but who's going to watch? - 19/01/2010 12:07:46 AM 569 Views
It sounds cool ... too bad I only have basic cable. - 19/01/2010 01:15:54 AM 397 Views
Rome and 300 really shouldn't ever be put in the same sentence. - 19/01/2010 01:20:16 AM 424 Views
You are mistaken. Both films/shows were close to their source material.. - 19/01/2010 02:29:00 AM 410 Views
I am not mistaken. The assumption that the source material is correct is inane. - 19/01/2010 05:23:20 AM 491 Views
The source of 300 is the graphic novel, not history - 19/01/2010 11:35:59 AM 444 Views
And the graphic novels gets its source material/distorts its source material from where? - 19/01/2010 04:58:30 PM 424 Views
The question is what the film aimed to be - 19/01/2010 07:45:18 PM 421 Views
It aimed to be shit. And it succeeded. - 19/01/2010 10:55:57 PM 408 Views
You do realize that the Graphic Novel is a work of fiction, right? - 20/01/2010 05:24:27 PM 399 Views
Golly, gee! I never knew! Thanks for all that. *NM* - 20/01/2010 11:56:59 PM 187 Views
300 is deliberately supposed to be non-historical, but this message got lost somewhere along the way - 21/01/2010 01:47:50 AM 428 Views
That was such a stupid potential argument that I gave him the benefit of the doubt and discarded it. - 20/01/2010 04:17:10 AM 382 Views
Why are you guys getting so worked up about this? - 20/01/2010 11:37:53 AM 388 Views
I enjoyed watching 300. - 20/01/2010 09:22:11 PM 417 Views
Sounds good, as long as it doesn't look like Xena or Hercules *NM* - 19/01/2010 11:34:23 AM 182 Views
How much skin does she show? *NM* - 19/01/2010 02:28:55 PM 181 Views
*points* the only relevant reply to this post *NM* - 20/01/2010 06:50:32 PM 197 Views

Reply to Message