Active Users:1221 Time:22/11/2024 03:49:26 PM
Dorian Gray (2009) everynametaken Send a noteboard - 26/12/2009 06:02:45 AM


It has been many years since I read The Picture of Dorian Gray and since it was a slow week with the holidays and all I have been catching up on some movies and TV shows. I decided to check this movie out and thought I would share my thoughts on it with all of you.

For those unfamiliar let me say that the book is a classic from Oscar Wilde and portrays the life of Dorian Gray who makes a kind of Faustian deal in which his sins are transferred into a portrait painting of him thus allowing him to experience the thralls of an extreme hedonism without paying the price physically for those sins. I don't want to revel the end of the story so let me stop there and just recommend the book for all those reading this movie review. It is a quick read and a classic and well worth reading if you enjoy classic literature.

So, on with the movie review! First, I will say that I thought the casting was very good. Ben Barnes does an excellent job of playing both a naive Dorian as well as a corrupted, hedonistic Dorian. He maintains excellent control of the role throughout the movie. Likewise, Colin Firth plays an excellent Lord Henry Wotton and Ben Chaplin nails Basil on the head. The Basil in this movie is very much like what I have always imagined Basil being like in the Wilde book.

That said, the only real disappointment for me was Rachel Hurd-Wood who played Sybil. Honestly, she just looked flat out ugly in the movie and her voice and mannerisms were just unappealing in every way. They could have cast her a lot better.

The scenery and setting was also very nice and convincing. I felt like the movie was really taking place in late 1800's and early 1900's London. The dress, wardrobe, and make-up was done well also.

As for the plot, there are variations from the original storyline, but I think the variations work and they don't seem to take away too much from the story. That said, there are some points in the movie where I just wanted them to hurry up and move on. I think the main problem in the plot movement is the writer's attempts to portray to the audience the corruption of Dorian's soul through his endless hedonism. At times the hazy scenes of opium and women just seem a little too much, a little stretched thin, almost unneeded. The ending is somewhat different from the book but maintains the spirit of the book.

Overall, I think the movie is a decent watch on a rainy afternoon or an evening in. The movie won't blow your socks off or anything, it won't be winning any awards but it stays pretty true to the points of the book and contains some good casting and backdrop. I give it 3 out of 5 stars.

Edit ironclad: added picture for the Home page.
But wine was the great assassin of both tradition and propriety...
-Brandon Sanderson, The Way of Kings
IMBD
This message last edited by ironclad on 11/01/2010 at 08:00:02 PM
Reply to message
Dorian Gray (2009) - 26/12/2009 06:02:45 AM 2341 Views
To me, Stuart Townsend will 4ever be Dorian Gray. From Extraordinary Gentlemen. *NM* - 26/12/2009 07:05:54 AM 255 Views
Indeed. - 26/12/2009 07:20:55 AM 586 Views
For me, he will always be Aragorn. *NM* - 26/12/2009 11:48:51 AM 280 Views
You're kidding, right? *NM* - 26/12/2009 11:57:02 AM 257 Views
That was Viggo Moretenson or however you spell his last name *NM* - 28/12/2009 05:29:01 AM 335 Views
Townsend dropped out only days before shooting - 29/12/2009 12:35:00 AM 527 Views
*features review* *NM* - 26/12/2009 11:59:14 AM 267 Views
*NM* - 26/12/2009 05:26:43 PM 256 Views
Funny, started reading Picture couple of weeks ago. - 02/01/2010 02:19:36 PM 463 Views

Reply to Message