Don't get too attached to all that free, high-quality video on Hulu. It just might disappear behind a pay wall before too long.
Speaking last night at an Internet Week event sponsored by The Hollywood Reporter, Jonathan Miller, News Corp.'s newly-installed chief digital officer, said he envisions a future where at least some of the TV shows and movies on Hulu, the premium video site co-owned by News Corp. (NWS), NBC Universal and Disney (DIS), are available only to subscribers.
Miller, whose last job was running AOL (parent of Daily Finance), prefaced his remark by noting that he won't attend his first Hulu board meeting until Monday, so the scenario he foresees is merely his own speculation. But, he continued, "in my opinion the answer could be yes. I don't see why over time that shouldn't happen. I don't think it's on the agenda for Monday [but] it seems to me that over time that could be a logical thing."
And considering that Miller is in charge of coordinating News Corp.'s efforts to find new ways to get consumers to pay for digital content generated by News Corp.'s properties -- which include Fox Television, Fox News, 20th Century Fox films, The Wall Street Journal and much more -- his definition of what's logical is likely to carry a lot of weight.
There is some variation out there about whether everything will be under a subscription or just premium content, but the indications I've seen is that everything will end up under subscription. You can find plenty more articles on Google.
What I wnat to say in response to this is - bad move, Hulu. I (and I am sure many others) were willing to watch the advertisements instead of pirating the shows. I enjoyed Hulu and was excited that it has expanded since its inception to add more shows that I watched. It was going good in its current format, that was until some stupid exec got the idea that people who were willing to watch the advertisements are going to be willing to pay subscriptions fees. To which I say, Uh, no.
Great job on the execs part in reversing all the ground made in bringing people in, away from piracy, to turning us around and driving us back to the Internet to downloading. Stupid move on Hulu's part. Hopefully someone explains this to execs before it is too late and they implement this asinine business model.
Speaking last night at an Internet Week event sponsored by The Hollywood Reporter, Jonathan Miller, News Corp.'s newly-installed chief digital officer, said he envisions a future where at least some of the TV shows and movies on Hulu, the premium video site co-owned by News Corp. (NWS), NBC Universal and Disney (DIS), are available only to subscribers.
Miller, whose last job was running AOL (parent of Daily Finance), prefaced his remark by noting that he won't attend his first Hulu board meeting until Monday, so the scenario he foresees is merely his own speculation. But, he continued, "in my opinion the answer could be yes. I don't see why over time that shouldn't happen. I don't think it's on the agenda for Monday [but] it seems to me that over time that could be a logical thing."
And considering that Miller is in charge of coordinating News Corp.'s efforts to find new ways to get consumers to pay for digital content generated by News Corp.'s properties -- which include Fox Television, Fox News, 20th Century Fox films, The Wall Street Journal and much more -- his definition of what's logical is likely to carry a lot of weight.
There is some variation out there about whether everything will be under a subscription or just premium content, but the indications I've seen is that everything will end up under subscription. You can find plenty more articles on Google.
What I wnat to say in response to this is - bad move, Hulu. I (and I am sure many others) were willing to watch the advertisements instead of pirating the shows. I enjoyed Hulu and was excited that it has expanded since its inception to add more shows that I watched. It was going good in its current format, that was until some stupid exec got the idea that people who were willing to watch the advertisements are going to be willing to pay subscriptions fees. To which I say, Uh, no.
Great job on the execs part in reversing all the ground made in bringing people in, away from piracy, to turning us around and driving us back to the Internet to downloading. Stupid move on Hulu's part. Hopefully someone explains this to execs before it is too late and they implement this asinine business model.
But wine was the great assassin of both tradition and propriety...
-Brandon Sanderson, The Way of Kings
-Brandon Sanderson, The Way of Kings
Soon, you'll have to pay for Hulu
26/10/2009 04:39:59 AM
- 1110 Views
I'm getting a little tired of everyone going on about how stupid companies are.
26/10/2009 06:04:30 AM
- 580 Views
It is self-defeating.
26/10/2009 06:48:18 AM
- 457 Views
Subscription services work just fine
26/10/2009 07:32:15 AM
- 559 Views
Not to mention that most of the shows can be watched online at the networks address.
26/10/2009 08:41:09 AM
- 515 Views
I think the point was...
26/10/2009 04:51:21 PM
- 416 Views
Yes, just ask Napster or Kazaa, etc. *NM*
26/10/2009 06:04:16 PM
- 165 Views
Not at all my point.
26/10/2009 01:59:28 PM
- 533 Views
Fair enough. Although, I've worked at plenty of corporations and...
26/10/2009 06:02:11 PM
- 443 Views
I'm having trouble finding the anger for this.
26/10/2009 07:30:11 PM
- 407 Views
One thing to note...
26/10/2009 07:55:41 PM
- 413 Views
heh
26/10/2009 07:59:14 PM
- 527 Views
I'm with you on that
26/10/2009 08:17:25 PM
- 462 Views
I typically don't even try, I usually watch seasons at a time once the airing period is over with.
27/10/2009 12:34:14 AM
- 458 Views
I don't understand why people use Hulu or downloads
26/10/2009 10:06:25 PM
- 545 Views
Can't g et access to it outside the US anyway. this might open it up internationally. Plus...
27/10/2009 02:48:06 AM
- 536 Views