I'd been holding out hope for you to reply as the only other person on this board likely to actually have seen the movie. 
View original postWord is the director is about to sue the actress for defamation (libelle diffamatoire) and damages for having undermined the movie's international career.
I just read Kechiche's diatribe on all the accusations against him... and I'm inclined to agree with the editor of the website who warned him beforehand that his diatribe might lead some to view him as paranoid. Though he may still have some good points - it's a long piece, much of it not really relating to this movie as such, but making some interesting accusations against certain journalists about having slandered other Cannes winners or jury members besides himself.
As for "undermined the movie's international career", though, let's be serious - as I wrote in my review, this kind of controversy can only increase the movie's box office.
View original postWith the other actress who has distanced herself from her partner's criticism or at least severely nuanced them, this could be costly...
I would hope that Kechiche has friends who will dissuade him from a move as foolish as suing Seydoux. But if your source for that rumour is no more than the vague threat in Kechice's piece, I think there is not much danger of a real suit being brought.
Blue is the Warmest Colour / La Vie d'Adèle
- 15/10/2013 08:58:27 PM
1300 Views
You know, Legolas
- 15/10/2013 09:53:46 PM
864 Views
It was intended to be humorous and poke fun at ourselves as much as you.
- 15/10/2013 10:27:45 PM
927 Views
well, maybe I misunderstood then
- 15/10/2013 11:07:10 PM
775 Views
Is it better now?
- 15/10/2013 11:15:09 PM
739 Views
No. "Puritan prudishness" characterizes much of America perfectly. Leave it in.
- 16/10/2013 03:10:01 PM
797 Views
Either way though, it caused the thread to derail into quite unintended directions.
- 16/10/2013 06:35:21 PM
785 Views
I think it's silly and thin-skinned to get offended at statements of the obvious.
- 16/10/2013 03:07:18 PM
807 Views
I will clarify
- 16/10/2013 05:43:32 PM
742 Views
I fail to see any snarkiness, or who would be "irked".
- 16/10/2013 10:33:46 PM
768 Views
Well, I did admit that I may have misunderstood his intentions.
- 17/10/2013 12:03:00 AM
937 Views
The point is that people should just say what they mean.
- 17/10/2013 03:36:16 AM
812 Views
I certainly don't avoid interacting with those who disagree with me on most things.
- 17/10/2013 07:16:43 PM
885 Views
Perhaps my Americentrism is showing, but I don't understand.
- 15/10/2013 10:55:51 PM
1087 Views
Either way, you guys, the point of my review was that this was more than just a sex movie. 
- 15/10/2013 11:20:02 PM
746 Views
- 15/10/2013 11:20:02 PM
746 Views
Well that makes it sound less interesting now, doesn't it? *NM*
- 16/10/2013 03:04:59 PM
395 Views
You can still go see it and consider it as one, if you like? *NM*
- 16/10/2013 06:08:03 PM
361 Views
*NM*
- 16/10/2013 06:08:03 PM
361 Views
It sounds interesting but the director sounds like a total idiot
- 16/10/2013 08:14:11 AM
836 Views
Well, a few more movies like this and he'll have a reputation that allows him to act that way.
- 16/10/2013 06:07:17 PM
770 Views
if they would cut the sex scenes out
- 17/10/2013 06:04:21 PM
813 Views
Let me get that straight.
- 17/10/2013 06:47:56 PM
797 Views
- 17/10/2013 06:47:56 PM
797 Views
Imight watch the rest of the movie but probably not
- 20/10/2013 11:27:05 AM
787 Views
Yeah, surprisingly enough, that longest scene really did get sort of boring.
- 20/10/2013 11:54:01 AM
855 Views
I seem to recall the author of the graphic novel, Julie Maroh, also criticising the sex scenes
- 18/10/2013 05:55:39 PM
1068 Views
Interesting. I'll see if I can find that interview somewhere, should be interesting (Edit: found it)
- 18/10/2013 07:57:23 PM
921 Views
Funnily...
- 27/10/2013 07:22:27 PM
794 Views
What did you make of the movie, though?
- 27/10/2013 08:39:35 PM
918 Views
Re: What did you make of the movie, though?
- 27/10/2013 11:44:02 PM
768 Views