I think the answer is that different audiences enjoy them now. The usual darker/grittier redux.
Zalis Send a noteboard - 15/03/2013 07:58:04 PM
It's another in the series of darker, grittier, post-modern-er, whatever-er remakes we've seen done in the last decade.
I think there's room for someone to like both Bond styles, but we have to be very up front about which is a cheesy spy movie and which is trying to be James Bourne.
The sword might be grateful to the forge fire, but never fond of it.
This message last edited by Zalis on 15/03/2013 at 07:58:48 PM
After losing interest 3 times in Skyfall,I realize the Bond franchise is a retarded shadow of itself
10/03/2013 07:06:31 PM
- 1099 Views
I enjoyed it.
10/03/2013 08:01:16 PM
- 696 Views
I thought it was alright
11/03/2013 05:33:43 AM
- 682 Views
I haven't been fond of Daniel Craig James Bond.
11/03/2013 05:57:41 PM
- 874 Views
That's why they call it a reboot. And let's face it, the franchise needed it.
13/03/2013 12:35:11 PM
- 686 Views
why did they need a reboot? Every Bond movie ever made money
17/03/2013 12:02:14 PM
- 734 Views
It's fine and dandy that the movies made money, but the point is the movies sucked.
19/03/2013 11:00:22 AM
- 671 Views
They could have made the exact same movie and just changed his name and I would have liked it
23/03/2013 03:58:01 PM
- 668 Views
It should have been called "Bond fails at everything he tries to accomplish."
13/03/2013 12:43:42 PM
- 699 Views
Yes, it's because I remember when Bond movies were fun that I posted this.
13/03/2013 01:52:37 PM
- 689 Views
I think the answer is that different audiences enjoy them now. The usual darker/grittier redux.
15/03/2013 07:58:04 PM
- 730 Views
Toldja
16/03/2013 04:59:23 PM
- 824 Views
I really appreciated that.
17/03/2013 04:47:10 PM
- 749 Views
As dead as his eyes? Because he has some seriously creepy eyes. *NM*
18/03/2013 01:58:08 PM
- 359 Views