My school did Cosi fan tutte last semester. the Don Alfonso (the ringmaster who sets up the plot) was so wooden he looked like he was tied to a board. I mean he had exactly one pose, arms down by his side, a few inches from his waste, feet about shoulder width apart. He'd twist his body towards the person he was singing to. It was truly awful acting, fortunately Cosi fan tutte is a comedy and he at least looked comedically bad.
In May I saw two english operas (The Wandering Scholar and Savitri) performed by a professional company in Manhattan (a small company, think it was called 'little opera company' or something). The acting was superb, I practically wept over Savitri when she started crying for her dead husband.
Point is, good acting helps a lot ... bad acting can drag a performance down.
In May I saw two english operas (The Wandering Scholar and Savitri) performed by a professional company in Manhattan (a small company, think it was called 'little opera company' or something). The acting was superb, I practically wept over Savitri when she started crying for her dead husband.
Point is, good acting helps a lot ... bad acting can drag a performance down.
When the career of George Lucas is reviewed, will he be the most influential film-maker of all time?
10/10/2012 12:27:59 AM
- 1029 Views
Shrug. He might be the most influential special-effects artist *NM*
10/10/2012 08:43:05 AM
- 336 Views
It is going to be the same way with Steve Jobs
10/10/2012 02:38:25 PM
- 666 Views
Steve Jobs shouldn't be remembered for the Apple II, it was Woz's creation.
18/10/2012 04:37:38 AM
- 587 Views
He deserves all the credit he gets, he's a superior artist to his pals Spielberg & Coppola
10/10/2012 04:15:29 PM
- 774 Views
My point is that his greatest contribution is horrifically overlooked.
11/10/2012 06:14:53 AM
- 645 Views
Hell has frozen over
11/10/2012 04:31:56 PM
- 664 Views
I'm going to start making a list of people who say stuff like this to me.
12/10/2012 03:48:36 AM
- 699 Views
acting does matter for opera though ...
23/10/2012 07:57:56 AM
- 853 Views
That's giving a single man way too much credit and influence, and under the wrong title
12/10/2012 01:13:07 AM
- 627 Views
I'm not sure the OP was saying he was the most influential director
12/10/2012 08:34:02 PM
- 667 Views
Pretty sure I said film-maker. (Checks the Subject line.) Yep, I did. *NM*
15/10/2012 05:28:50 AM
- 331 Views
That's precisely the problem. You said filmmaker, not effects studio owner. *NM*
18/10/2012 10:31:26 PM
- 298 Views
Re: That's precisely the problem. You said filmmaker, not effects studio owner.
19/10/2012 03:46:33 PM
- 644 Views
Short answer, no.
15/10/2012 06:19:52 PM
- 725 Views
So who beats him out?
16/10/2012 02:23:19 AM
- 629 Views
Thats the point, he didn't actually change anything; he demanded that others change things.
16/10/2012 02:35:03 PM
- 794 Views
You have a strange definition of influence.
16/10/2012 09:55:59 PM
- 667 Views
Not really, influence is somthing actively done, his role was too passive.
17/10/2012 03:23:40 PM
- 707 Views
Spielburg, Howard, Coppola, Tarrentino... There is a long list, even only among the modern filmakers *NM*
16/10/2012 02:39:28 PM
- 332 Views
Maybe, no, no, and no. Lucas had a much bigger impact that any of the film-makers .....
18/10/2012 04:40:41 AM
- 614 Views