Active Users:1152 Time:22/11/2024 01:23:13 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Not really, influence is somthing actively done, his role was too passive. HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 17/10/2012 03:23:40 PM
If you have always wanted to be able to dunk a basketball, but figured that you were just to fat and out of shape to ever do so, and one day you saw a 450 lb midget do it; thus, resutling in you rethinking your previously conceived limitations, were you influenced? No, you were not. "Insipred" could possibly be used, but not influenced.
Reply to message
When the career of George Lucas is reviewed, will he be the most influential film-maker of all time? Dannymac - 10/10/2012 12:27:59 AM 1029 Views
ont forget THX and Skywalker Sound. *NM* MightyYT - 10/10/2012 04:02:18 AM 333 Views
Absolutely, right. ironclad - 10/10/2012 08:11:54 AM 735 Views
Shrug. He might be the most influential special-effects artist *NM* beetnemesis - 10/10/2012 08:43:05 AM 336 Views
Hardly, he's not even one... *NM* DomA - 12/10/2012 01:21:18 AM 300 Views
It is going to be the same way with Steve Jobs Roland00 - 10/10/2012 02:38:25 PM 666 Views
Steve Jobs shouldn't be remembered for the Apple II, it was Woz's creation. Anonymous2000 - 18/10/2012 04:37:38 AM 585 Views
He deserves all the credit he gets, he's a superior artist to his pals Spielberg & Coppola Cannoli - 10/10/2012 04:15:29 PM 772 Views
My point is that his greatest contribution is horrifically overlooked. Dannymac - 11/10/2012 06:14:53 AM 645 Views
Hell has frozen over imlad - 11/10/2012 04:31:56 PM 662 Views
I'm going to start making a list of people who say stuff like this to me. Cannoli - 12/10/2012 03:48:36 AM 697 Views
well, I always point it out when it happens to me imlad - 12/10/2012 08:24:44 PM 679 Views
acting does matter for opera though ... The_Muted_Grimaud - 23/10/2012 07:57:56 AM 851 Views
That's giving a single man way too much credit and influence, and under the wrong title DomA - 12/10/2012 01:13:07 AM 626 Views
I'm not sure the OP was saying he was the most influential director imlad - 12/10/2012 08:34:02 PM 667 Views
Pretty sure I said film-maker. (Checks the Subject line.) Yep, I did. *NM* Dannymac - 15/10/2012 05:28:50 AM 331 Views
That's precisely the problem. You said filmmaker, not effects studio owner. *NM* Tom - 18/10/2012 10:31:26 PM 298 Views
Re: That's precisely the problem. You said filmmaker, not effects studio owner. DomA - 19/10/2012 03:46:33 PM 644 Views
this is not in response to DomA's comment, but imlad - 19/10/2012 08:31:23 PM 670 Views
I've seen parts of that. It's a good one. *NM* ironclad - 22/10/2012 08:49:47 AM 295 Views
I agree 100%. *NM* Tom - 18/10/2012 10:29:40 PM 308 Views
Short answer, no. HyogaRott - 15/10/2012 06:19:52 PM 724 Views
So who beats him out? Dannymac - 16/10/2012 02:23:19 AM 629 Views
Thats the point, he didn't actually change anything; he demanded that others change things. HyogaRott - 16/10/2012 02:35:03 PM 792 Views
You have a strange definition of influence. Nate - 16/10/2012 09:55:59 PM 665 Views
Not really, influence is somthing actively done, his role was too passive. HyogaRott - 17/10/2012 03:23:40 PM 706 Views
Spielburg, Howard, Coppola, Tarrentino... There is a long list, even only among the modern filmakers *NM* HyogaRott - 16/10/2012 02:39:28 PM 332 Views
Maybe, no, no, and no. Lucas had a much bigger impact that any of the film-makers ..... Anonymous2000 - 18/10/2012 04:40:41 AM 614 Views
Well, as a director he doesn't usually even warrant mention Tom - 18/10/2012 10:27:24 PM 842 Views
Absolutely not. Tom - 18/10/2012 10:19:20 PM 788 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes