Active Users:1120 Time:22/11/2024 02:01:04 PM
Absolutely, right. ironclad Send a noteboard - 10/10/2012 08:11:54 AM
In addition to that, Star Wars was among those films in the 70s (together with Spielberg's) that triggered the whole idea of blockbuster movies and merchandising articles, toys etc. You can feel about those things however you want, but they have been really influential and shaped the movie making and marketing ever since.
*MySmiley*

You mustn't be afraid to dream a little bigger, darling.
Reply to message
When the career of George Lucas is reviewed, will he be the most influential film-maker of all time? - 10/10/2012 12:27:59 AM 1029 Views
ont forget THX and Skywalker Sound. *NM* - 10/10/2012 04:02:18 AM 333 Views
Absolutely, right. - 10/10/2012 08:11:54 AM 736 Views
Shrug. He might be the most influential special-effects artist *NM* - 10/10/2012 08:43:05 AM 336 Views
Hardly, he's not even one... *NM* - 12/10/2012 01:21:18 AM 300 Views
It is going to be the same way with Steve Jobs - 10/10/2012 02:38:25 PM 666 Views
Steve Jobs shouldn't be remembered for the Apple II, it was Woz's creation. - 18/10/2012 04:37:38 AM 587 Views
He deserves all the credit he gets, he's a superior artist to his pals Spielberg & Coppola - 10/10/2012 04:15:29 PM 774 Views
Hell has frozen over - 11/10/2012 04:31:56 PM 664 Views
I'm going to start making a list of people who say stuff like this to me. - 12/10/2012 03:48:36 AM 699 Views
well, I always point it out when it happens to me - 12/10/2012 08:24:44 PM 679 Views
acting does matter for opera though ... - 23/10/2012 07:57:56 AM 852 Views
That's giving a single man way too much credit and influence, and under the wrong title - 12/10/2012 01:13:07 AM 627 Views
I agree 100%. *NM* - 18/10/2012 10:29:40 PM 308 Views
Short answer, no. - 15/10/2012 06:19:52 PM 724 Views
Absolutely not. - 18/10/2012 10:19:20 PM 789 Views

Reply to Message